Skip Navigation


Cardiovascular Research Advance Access first published online on December 4, 2007
This version [Corrected Proof] published online on January 16, 2008

Cardiovascular Research, doi:10.1093/cvr/cvm087
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
77/4/732    most recent
cvm087v2
cvm087v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tchoua, U.
Right arrow Articles by Sviridov, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tchoua, U.
Right arrow Articles by Sviridov, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The effect of cholesteryl ester transfer protein overexpression and inhibition on reverse cholesterol transport

Urbain Tchoua1,2, Wilissa D'Souza1, Nigora Mukhamedova1, Denise Blum2, Eric Niesor2, Jacques Mizrahi2, Cyrille Maugeais2 and Dmitri Sviridov1,*

1 Baker Heart Research Institute, PO Box 6492, St. Kilda Road Central, Melbourne, Victoria 8008, Australia
2 Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland

* Corresponding author. Tel: +61 3 85321363; fax: +61 3 85321100. E-mail address: dmitri.sviridov{at}baker.edu.au

Aims: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) has a well-established role in lipoprotein metabolism, but the effect of its overexpression or inhibition on the efficiency of reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) is unclear.

Methods and results: Neither overexpression of CETP nor treatment with CETP inhibitor Torcetrapib of RAW 264.7 macrophages or HepG2 hepatocytes affected cholesterol efflux in vitro. Overexpression of CETP or treatment with Torcetrapib, respectively, stimulated or inhibited HDL cholesteryl ester uptake by HepG2 but not by RAW 264.7 cells. When RAW 264.7 cells transfected with CETP or ATP binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) were injected intraperitoneally into mice, cholesterol egress from macrophages was elevated for ABCA1- but not for CETP-transfected macrophages. Systemic expression of CETP in mice by adenoviral infection stimulated egress of cholesterol to plasma and liver without affecting HDL levels. Treatment with Torcetrapib did not affect appearance of macrophage cholesterol in plasma and liver, but inhibited its excretion into feces. Treatment of hamsters with Torcetrapib led to elevation of HDL cholesterol, an increase in the capacity of plasma to support cholesterol efflux, and increased egress of cholesterol from macrophages to plasma and feces in vivo.

Conclusion: Both increased (mice study) and decreased (hamster study) CETP activity could result in enhanced RCT.

KEYWORDS Cholesteryl ester transfer protein; Reverse cholesterol transport; CETP inhibition; Lipoproteins; Cholesterol; Atherosclerosis


Time for primary review: 25 days


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
N. Mukhamedova, G. Escher, W. D'Souza, U. Tchoua, A. Grant, Z. Krozowski, M. Bukrinsky, and D. Sviridov
Enhancing apolipoprotein A-I-dependent cholesterol efflux elevates cholesterol export from macrophages in vivo
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 2312 - 2322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
Y. Levy
High-density lipoprotein mass, cholesteryl ester transport protein, and macrophage reverse cholesterol transport: from the bedside back to the bench
Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2008; 77(4): 614 - 615.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.