Cardiovascular Research Advance Access originally published online on March 1, 2008
Cardiovascular Research 2008 79(1):42-51; doi:10.1093/cvr/cvn057
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of metoprolol and ivabradine on left ventricular remodelling and Ca2+ handling in the post-infarction rat heart
M
czewski*,

Department of Clinical Physiology, Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education, Marymoncka 99, 01-813 Warszawa, Poland
* Corresponding author. Tel: +48 22 5693 841; fax: +48 22 5693 712. E-mail address: maczmich{at}cmkp.edu.pl
Aims: β-Blockers reduce mortality and morbidity in heart failure. Many of their benefits can be explained solely by heart rate reduction (HRR). We aimed to verify whether the β-blocker, metoprolol, and the pure heart-rate-reducing agent, ivabradine, have the same effects on haemodynamic function, ventricular remodeling, and Ca2+ handling in post-myocardial infarction (MI) heart failure in rat.
Methods and results: Metoprolol (250 mg/kg/day) or ivabradine (10 mg/kg/day), offering similar HRR, or no treatment, was started 24 h after an induction of MI or sham surgery in rat. Eight weeks post-MI metoprolol and ivabradine similarly partially prevented deterioration of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and reduced post-MI LV wall stress. However, metoprolol partially prevented LV dilation, whereas ivabradine potentiated LV hypertrophy. Metoprolol, but not ivabradine, partially prevented post-MI chronotropic incompetence. Metoprolol markedly, whereas ivabradine mildly, increased the amplitude of the Ca2+ transient in post-MI cardiomyocytes. Ivabradine, but not metoprolol, partially prevented the MI-induced depression of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) activity, while metoprolol, but not ivabradine, suppressed Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) overactivity and normalized Ca2+ sensitivity of ryanodine receptors.
Conclusion: Although both metoprolol and ivabradine comparably prevented post-MI deterioration of haemodynamic function in the rat, metoprolol had additional potentially beneficial effects; it prevented LV dilation and hypertrophy, chronotropic incompetence, strongly increased contractility of isolated cardiomyocytes, and prevented the potentially proarrhythmic increase in NCX activity. This indicates that pure HRR does not account for effects of β-blockade in the post-MI setting. Metoprolol and ivabradine similarly improve LV function, although differently affect LV morphology and cellular Ca2+ handling in the post-infarction rat heart.
KEYWORDS Myocardial infarction; Remodelling; Calcium handling; Haemodynamics; Heart failure; Heart rate
Time for primary review: 29 days
Both authors equally contributed to the study.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Cardiovasc Res:
- Heart-rate reduction and β-blockade in early post-infarction cardiac remodelling
- Robert E. Goldstein and Mark C.P. Haigney
Cardiovasc Res 2008 79: 5-6.[Extract] [FREE Full Text]
Related Article
- Heart-rate reduction and β-blockade in early post-infarction cardiac remodelling
- Robert E. Goldstein and Mark C.P. Haigney
Cardiovasc Res 2008 79: 5-6.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Lee, M. A. Stagg, S. Fukushima, G. K. R. Soppa, U. Siedlecka, S. J. Youssef, K. Suzuki, M. H. Yacoub, and C. M. N. Terracciano Adult progenitor cell transplantation influences contractile performance and calcium handling of recipient cardiomyocytes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): H927 - H936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Heusch, A. Skyschally, P. Gres, P. van Caster, D. Schilawa, and R. Schulz Improvement of regional myocardial blood flow and function and reduction of infarct size with ivabradine: protection beyond heart rate reduction Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2008; 29(18): 2265 - 2275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Goldstein and M. C.P. Haigney Heart-rate reduction and {beta}-blockade in early post-infarction cardiac remodelling Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2008; 79(1): 5 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


