Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2003 59(2):520-526; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00396-1
© 2003 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Uren, N. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Uren, N. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2003, European Society of Cardiology

Influence of differential vascular remodeling on the coronary vasomotor response

Andrew L. McLeoda,b, David E. Newbya,*, David B. Northridgeb, Keith A.A. Foxa and Neal G. Urena

aDepartment of Cardiology, Royal infirmary, 51 Little France Crescent, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
bDepartment of Cardiology, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-131-242-6422; fax: +44-131-242-6422. d.e.newby{at}ed.ac.uk

Objectives: Arterial remodeling may increase or decrease the luminal encroachment of atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary circulation. However, the factors determining the nature and consequences of the remodeling process remain poorly characterized. The study aims were to assess whether the pattern of vascular remodeling influences the physical and vasomotor responses of the coronary arteries in vivo in man. Methods: Coronary vessel area, distensibility and stiffness were determined in positively, negatively and non-remodeled arterial segments using intravascular ultrasound and Doppler flow measurement. Epicardial vasomotor responses were determined following intracoronary boluses of acetylcholine (10–6 and 10–4 M), adenosine (24–30 µg) and nitroglycerin (200 µg). Results: Fifty-six coronary arterial segments were studied in 25 patients. In comparison to non- and positively remodeled segments, negatively remodeled segments had a higher stiffness index (67±16 vs. 33±5 and 38±8, respectively; P<0.02) and appeared to have lower compliance and distensibility (0.66±0.17 vs. 1.65±0.54 and 0.94±0.18/mmHg; P = NS). Non-remodeled segments had a greater change in vessel area with 10–6 M acetylcholine (4.9±0.8%), compared to positively and negatively remodeled segments (0.6±1.8% and –4.9±1.8%, respectively, P<0.05). A significant degree of preservation of vasodilatation to 10–6 M acetylcholine was evident in positively remodeled compared with negatively remodeled segments (P<0.05). Nitroglycerin caused greater vasodilatation in non-remodeled segments (7.2±3.8%) than either positively or negatively remodeled segments (4.7±0.9 and 3.7±0.6%, respectively, P<0.05). Conclusions: Vascular remodeling is an important and major determinant of local epicardial vasomotor responses. Both structural and functional abnormalities are associated with negative remodeling that may contribute to the adverse effects of such lesions.

KEYWORDS Coronary circulation; Endothelial function; Blood flow; Remodeling; Acetylcholine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. K. Hermsmeyer, R. G. Mishra, D. Pavcnik, B. Uchida, M. K. Axthelm, F. Z. Stanczyk, K. A. Burry, D. R. Illingworth, J. C. Kaski, and F. J. Nordt
Prevention of Coronary Hyperreactivity in Preatherogenic Menopausal Rhesus Monkeys by Transdermal Progesterone
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, May 1, 2004; 24(5): 955 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.