Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2003 58(2):478-486; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00252-9
© 2003 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eggermann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Beltinger, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eggermann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Beltinger, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2003, European Society of Cardiology

Endothelial progenitor cell culture and differentiation in vitro: a methodological comparison using human umbilical cord blood

Juliane Eggermanna, Stefanie Klichea,1, Gergely Jarmyb, Karin Hoffmanna, Ulrike Mayr-Beyrlea, Klaus-Michael Debatinb, Johannes Waltenbergera,* and Christian Beltingerb

aDepartment of Internal Medicine II (Cardiology), Ulm University Medical Centre, Robert-Koch-Str. 8, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
bUniversity Children's Hospital, Ulm University Medical Centre, 89081 Ulm, Germany

johannes.waltenberger{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-731-500-24464; fax: +49-731-500-24533.

Objective: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) can contribute to vascular repair and targeted tumour therapy. Little is known about generating EPC from human umbilical cord blood. We therefore compared methods for purification of EPC from human umbilical cord blood. Methods: Mononuclear cells were isolated from human umbilical cord blood by density gradient centrifugation and used either unselected or after CD34 preselection. Unselected mononuclear cells were cultured for 9 days. Culture-dish-adherent (CDAC) and non-adherent (CDNAC) CD34+ cells were cultured separately for 4 weeks. Surface markers were assessed by immunofluorescence staining and FACS analysis. Results: In unselected mononuclear cells, VEGF-R2 and VE-cadherin expression increased up to day 6. They stained positive with UEA-1 and took up acetylated LDL. Expression of CD45 and CD14 decreased over time, but remained strong. CD133 and CD34 were not expressed. CD34+-CDNAC acquired an endothelial phenotype over time with an increase of VEGFR-2 and von Willebrand factor (vWF). CD45 and CD14 decreased, while CD34 and the progenitor-cell marker CD133 remained strongly expressed. CD34+-CDAC showed a strong increase in VEGFR-2, CD133, CD34 and vWF, while CD14 decreased, and CD45 did not change. Conclusion: Putative EPC can be obtained from human umbilical cord blood. When selected for CD34, cells can be differentiated in culture to express markers of mature endothelial cells, while keeping progenitor markers. In contrast, short-term culture of unselected mononuclear cells leads to an endothelioid–monocytoid phenotype devoid of progenitor markers. Thus, the outgrowth from CD34-selected cells appears to be superior to short-term culture of unselected mononuclear cells with regard to endothelial cell-lineage specific differentiation of cells with a progenitor marker profile.

KEYWORDS Ac LDL, acetylated low density lipoprotein; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; DiI, 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3'3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate; EC, endothelial cells; ECGF, endothelial cell growth supplement; EPC, endothelial progenitor cells; HUCB, human umbilical cord blood; LDL, low density lipoprotein; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MNC, mononuclear cells; NO, nitric oxide; CDAC, culture-dish-adherent cells; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; CDNAC, culture-dish-non-adherent cells; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR-2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2; vWF, von Willebrand factor


1 Present address: Institute of Immunology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
B. Hibbert, X. Ma, A. Pourdjabbar, E. Holm, K. Rayner, Y.-X. Chen, J. Sun, L. Filion, and E. R. O'Brien
Inhibition of endothelial progenitor cell glycogen synthase kinase-3{beta} results in attenuated neointima formation and enhanced re-endothelialization after arterial injury
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2009; 83(1): 16 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ther Adv Cardiovasc DisHome page
K. Yamahara and H. Itoh
Potential use of endothelial progenitor cells for regeneration of the vasculature
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2009; 3(1): 17 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
K. C. Partlow, J. Chen, J. A. Brant, A. M. Neubauer, T. E. Meyerrose, M. H. Creer, J. A. Nolta, S. D. Caruthers, G. M. Lanza, and S. A. Wickline
19F magnetic resonance imaging for stem/progenitor cell tracking with multiple unique perfluorocarbon nanobeacons
FASEB J, June 1, 2007; 21(8): 1647 - 1654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
G. C. Schatteman, M. Dunnwald, and C. Jiao
Biology of bone marrow-derived endothelial cell precursors
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H1 - H18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
N. Ma, Y. Ladilov, J. M. Moebius, L. Ong, C. Piechaczek, A. David, A. Kaminski, Y.-H. Choi, W. Li, D. Egger, et al.
Intramyocardial delivery of human CD133+ cells in a SCID mouse cryoinjury model: Bone marrow vs. cord blood-derived cells
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2006; 71(1): 158 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Atluri, G. P. Liao, C. M. Panlilio, V. M. Hsu, M. J. Leskowitz, K. J. Morine, J. E. Cohen, M. F. Berry, E. E. Suarez, D. A. Murphy, et al.
Neovasculogenic therapy to augment perfusion and preserve viability in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1728 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. J. Post and J. Waltenberger
ACE inhibitors and statins for bone marrow failure following myocardial infarction?
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2006; 70(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. A. Ingram, N. M. Caplice, and M. C. Yoder
Unresolved questions, changing definitions, and novel paradigms for defining endothelial progenitor cells
Blood, September 1, 2005; 106(5): 1525 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
X. Wu, E. Rabkin-Aikawa, K. J. Guleserian, T. E. Perry, Y. Masuda, F. W. H. Sutherland, F. J. Schoen, J. E. Mayer Jr., and J. Bischoff
Tissue-engineered microvessels on three-dimensional biodegradable scaffolds using human endothelial progenitor cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): H480 - H487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
C. Herder, T. Tonn, R. Oostendorp, S. Becker, U. Keller, C. Peschel, M. Grez, and E. Seifried
Sustained Expansion and Transgene Expression of Coagulation Factor VIII-Transduced Cord Blood-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2003; 23(12): 2266 - 2272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.