Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2002 56(3):489-491; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00671-5
© 2002 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babaei, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Babaei, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2002, European Society of Cardiology

Angiogenesis? the answer is NO·

Saeid Babaei, Golnaz Karoubi and Duncan J. Stewart*

Terrence Donnelly Vascular Biology Laboratory, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-416-864-5724; fax: +1-416-864-5419 stewartd@smh.toronto.on.ca

Received 16 September 2002; accepted 18 September 2002

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

We thank Drs Dulak and Jozkowicz for their interest in our paper [1]. They raise the question of whether induction of VEGF expression by NO in cultured smooth muscle cells (SMCs) may have contributed to the angiogenic effects of eNOS in our co-culture model. Although, we agree that this . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?