© 2002 by European Society of Cardiology
Copyright © 2002, European Society of Cardiology
Body surface potential mapping in patients with Brugada syndrome: right precordial ST segment variations and reverse changes in left precordial leads
aDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hospital of the University of Münster, Münster, Germany
bUniversity Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
brunsh{at}uni-muenster.de
* Corresponding author: Tel.: +49-251-834-8370; fax: +49-251-834-7864
Objective: The aim of this study was to perform quantitative signal analysis of high-resolution body surface potential mapping (BSPM) recordings to assess its usefulness for the electrocardiographic characterization of patients with Brugada syndrome. The diagnostic value of the QRS integral and of the gradient of the ST segment have not been elucidated in Brugada syndrome. Methods: In 27 subjects (16 with Brugada syndrome and 11 healthy subjects), 120-lead BSPMs were recorded at baseline and after pharmacological provocation with intravenous administration of ajmaline (1 mg/kg). The recordings were analyzed for two regions outside the positions of the standard ECG leads: the right precordial leads (RPL) on the second and third intercostal space (high RPL) and the left precordial leads (LPL) between the fifth and seventh intercostal space (low LPL). Results: At baseline, in high RPL regions, patients with Brugada syndrome showed more positive QRS integrals (–5±8 vs. –16±8 mV ms) and a steeper negative ST segment gradient (–0.62±0.41 vs. –0.29±0.40 mV/s) compared to healthy subjects, P<0.001. In contrast, in low LPL regions, reduced QRS integrals and positive ST segment gradients were observed. These ECG signs were even more pronounced after intravenous ajmaline and showed a better discrimination for patients with Brugada syndrome than differences in RPL or LPL during baseline, respectively. Conclusions: In the left precordial leads, patients with Brugada syndrome showed ECG changes which were reversed in relation to the ECG changes observed in right precordial leads. BSPM measurement is a useful tool to improve the understanding of the electrocardiographic changes in the Brugada syndrome.
KEYWORDS Ventricular arrhythmias; ECG; Sudden death; Antiarrhythmic agents
1 Hans-Jürgen Bruns and Lars Eckardt contributed equally to this paper.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Veltmann, C. Wolpert, F. Sacher, P. Mabo, R. Schimpf, F. Streitner, J. Brade, F. Kyndt, J. Kuschyk, H. Le Marec, et al. Response to intravenous ajmaline: a retrospective analysis of 677 ajmaline challenges Europace, October 1, 2009; 11(10): 1345 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. G. Meregalli, A. A.M. Wilde, and H. L. Tan Pathophysiological mechanisms of Brugada syndrome: Depolarization disorder, repolarization disorder, or more? Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2005; 67(3): 367 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-S. Hermida, I. Denjoy, G.èv. Jarry, S. Jandaud, C. Bertrand, and J. Delonca Electrocardiographic predictors of Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(5): 447 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Rolf, H.-J. Bruns, T. Wichter, P. Kirchhof, M. Ribbing, K. Wasmer, M. Paul, G. Breithardt, W. Haverkamp, and L. Eckardt The ajmaline challenge in Brugada syndrome: Diagnostic impact, safety, and recommended protocol Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2003; 24(12): 1104 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Eckardt, P. Kirchhof, E. Schulze-Bahr, S. Rolf, M. Ribbing, P. Loh, H.-J. Bruns, A. Witte, P. Milberg, M. Borggrefe, et al. Electrophysiologic investigation in Brugada syndrome. Yield of programmed ventricular stimulation at two ventricular sites with up to three premature beats Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2002; 23(17): 1394 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|