Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2001 52(1):136-142; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00366-2
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kvist, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvany, M. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kvist, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvany, M. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2001, European Society of Cardiology

Reduced medication and normalization of vascular structure, but continued hypertension in renovascular patients after revascularization

Stinne Kvista,1 and Michael J Mulvanyb,*

aDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark
bDepartment of Pharmacology, Bartholin Building, University Park 240, University of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

stinne.kvist{at}dadlnet.dk

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +45-89-421-711; fax: +45-86-128-804 mm{at}farm.au.dk

Objective: The effect of invasive treatment of renal artery stenosis on the use of antihypertensive medication, blood pressure, and morphology and function of resistance arteries was investigated in 14 renovascular hypertensive patients before and after treatment compared to normotensive controls. Methods: Use of antihypertensive medication was calculated as defined daily doses (DDD). Resistance arteries were taken from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies and analyzed in a myograph. Results: Prior to invasive treatment, blood pressure of the patients was elevated compared to normotensive controls. Six months after technically successful invasive treatment, patients were still hypertensive compared to time-matched controls. The use of antihypertensive medication was reduced from 4.4±0.7 DDD before invasive treatment to 3.0±0.6 DDD 6 months after treatment. Vascular structure of resistance arteries, expressed as media/lumen ratio (media thickness to diameter), was greater in patients before invasive treatment (10.7±1.0%) compared to normotensive controls (7.9±0.8%). Media/lumen ratio of resistance arteries was reduced to that of the controls 6 months after invasive treatment despite the remaining hypertension. The functional studies showed no difference in response to acetylcholine, adenosine, noradrenaline or angiotensin II between patients and controls before or after treatment. Conclusions: This study shows that hypertension and increased media/lumen ratio of resistance arteries prevail in renovascular hypertensive patients despite antihypertensive medication and that invasive treatment is of benefit as regards use of antihypertensive medication. The study provides the novel information that the remaining hypertension is not due to uncorrected media/lumen ratio of the resistance arteries.

KEYWORDS Antihypertensive/diuretic agents; Arteries; Blood pressure; Hypertension; Remodeling


1 Present address: Department of Medicine, Hospital of Randers, 8900 Randers, Denmark. Tel.: +45-89-102-454.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
F. Feihl, L. Liaudet, B. I. Levy, and B. Waeber
Hypertension and microvascular remodelling
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2008; 78(2): 274 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.