Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2001 50(3):509-515; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00205-X
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamogawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tei, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamogawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tei, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2001, European Society of Cardiology

Dystrophin-deficient myocardium is vulnerable to pressure overload in vivo

Yasuyuki Kamogawaa, Sadatoshi Biroa,*, Masato Maedaa, Manabu Setoguchia, Tatsumi Hirakawaa, Hiroki Yoshidab and Chuwa Teia

aFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 8908520, Japan
bDepartment of Pathology, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 8908520, Japan

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +81-99-275-5318; fax: +81-99-265-8447 biro{at}m2.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp

Objective: Dystrophin provides mechanical reinforcement to the membranes of myocytes. Dystrophin abnormalities are known to cause cardiomyopathy and skeletal muscle disorders; however, the pathogenesis of these abnormalities remains unclear. Dystrophin-deficient skeletal muscle is vulnerable to stresses such as stretch and hypo-osmotic shock. We investigated whether the myocardium of dystrophin-deficient (mdx) mice shows increased vulnerability to acute pressure overload in vivo. Methods and results: Abdominal aortic banding was performed in 12-week-old mdx and control mice. The aortic pressure was measured by cannulation of the right carotid artery at the time of sacrifice. Systolic pressures in mdx mice at 0, 1, 2, 7 and 14 days after aortic banding were 100±11, 119±7, 123±4, 134±11 and 130±10 mmHg, respectively. Microscopic analysis revealed focal lesions in the left ventricular wall in banded mdx mice. These lesions consisted of damaged myocytes and inflammatory cells, and also of fibrosis at a late stage. Similar lesions were not observed in non-banded or banded control mice. The proportion of areas of lesions to total left ventricular area increased over time: 1.0±0.6% in mdx mice without aortic banding (sham, n=6), and 1.7±1.4% 1 day (n=6, vs. sham, NS), 2.6±1.9% 2 days (n=7, vs. sham, P<0.05), 6.3±6.5% 7 days (n=13, vs. sham, P<0.05) and 9.9±8.3% 14 days after aortic banding (n=15, vs. sham, P<0.01). Furthermore, linear regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between percentage of lesion area and systolic pressure in mdx mice (P<0.05). Conclusion: Dystrophin-deficient myocardium is more vulnerable than normal myocardium to pressure overload in vivo. This result has two clinical implications: (1) the patients with dystrophynopathy, such as the Duchenne and the Becker types of muscular dystrophy and X-linked type of dilated cardiomyopathy, who develop arterial hypertension should be treated aggressively, and (2) they should avoid stresses that elevate blood pressure.

KEYWORDS Blood pressure; Cardiomyopathy; Histo(patho)logy; Hypertension; Myocytes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
L. Elsherif, M. S. Huang, S.-Y. Shai, Y. Yang, R. Y. Li, J. Chun, M. A. Mekany, A. L. Chu, S. J. Kaufman, and R. S. Ross
Combined Deficiency of Dystrophin and {beta}1 Integrin in the Cardiac Myocyte Causes Myocardial Dysfunction, Fibrosis and Calcification
Circ. Res., May 9, 2008; 102(9): 1109 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.