Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2000 47(2):294-305; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(00)00115-2
© 2000 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Budde, J. M
Right arrow Articles by Vinten-Johansen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Budde, J. M
Right arrow Articles by Vinten-Johansen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2000, European Society of Cardiology

Comparative study of AMP579 and adenosine in inhibition of neutrophil-mediated vascular and myocardial injury during 24 h of reperfusion

Jason M Buddea, Daniel A Veleza, Zhi-Qing Zhaoa,*, Kenneth L Clarkb, Cullen D Morrisa, Satoshi Murakia, Robert A Guytona and Jakob Vinten-Johansena

aCardiothoracic Research Laboratory, The Carlyle Fraser Heart Center/Crawford Long Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree St., NE, Atlanta, GA 30365-2225, USA
bRhône-Poulenc Rorer Research and Development, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-404-686-2511; fax: +1-404-686-4888 zzhao{at}emory.edu

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare protective effects of AMP579 and adenosine (Ado) at reperfusion (R) on inhibition of polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) activation, PMN-mediated injury to coronary artery endothelium, and final infarct size. Methods: In anesthetized dogs, 1 h of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion was followed by 24 h R and drugs were administered at R. Control (n=8, saline control), AMPI (n=7, AMP579, 50 µg/kg i.v. bolus followed by 3 µg/kg/min for 2 h), AMPII (n=7, AMP579, 50 µg/kg i.v. bolus), AMPIII (n=7, AMP579, 3 µg/kg/min i.v. for 2 h), and Ado (n=7, adenosine, 140 µg/kg/min i.v. for 2 h). Results: AMP579 in vitro directly inhibited superoxide radical (O2) generation (nM/5x106 PMNs) from PMNs dose-dependently (from 17±1* at 10 nM to 2±0.2* at 10 µM vs. activated 30±2). However, inhibition of O2 generation by Ado at each concentration was significantly less than for AMP579. The IC50 value for AMP579 (0.09±0.02 µM) on O2 generation was significantly less than that of Ado (3.9±1.1 µM). Adherence of unstimulated PMN to postischemic coronary artery endothelium (PMNs/mm2) was attenuated in AMPI and AMPIII vs. Control (60±3* and 58±3* vs. Control 110±4), while Ado partially attenuated PMN adherence (98±3*). Accordingly, endothelial-dependent vascular relaxation was significantly greater in AMPI and AMPIII vs. Ado. At 24 h R, myocardial blood flow (MBF, ml/min/g) in the area at risk (AAR), confirmed by colored microspheres, in AMPI and AMPIII was significantly improved (0.8±0.1* and 0.7±0.1* vs. Control 0.3±0.04). Infarct size (IS, TTC staining) in AMPI and AMPIII was significantly reduced from 38±3% in Control to 21±4%* and 22±3%*, respectively, confirmed by lower plasma creatine kinase activity (I.U./g protein) in these two groups (27±6* and 32±2* vs. 49±3). Cardiac myeloperoxidase activity (MPO, Abs/min) in the AAR was significantly reduced in AMPI and AMPIII vs. Control (36±11* and 35±10* vs. 89±10). However, changes in MBF, IS and MPO were not significantly altered by Ado. Conclusions: These data suggest that continuous infusion of AMP579 at R is more potent than adenosine in attenuating R injury, and AMP579-induced cardioprotection involves inhibition of PMN-induced vascular and myocardial tissue injury. *P<0.05 vs. Control.

KEYWORDS Adenosine; Free radicals; Ischemia; Leucocytes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.