Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1999 42(1):57-64; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(98)00319-8
© 1999 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gattullo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Westerhof, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gattullo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Westerhof, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1999, European Society of Cardiology

Ischaemic preconditioning changes the pattern of coronary reactive hyperaemia in the goat: role of adenosine and nitric oxide

Donatella Gattulloa, Ronald J. Lindenb, Gianni Losanoa, Pasquale Pagliaroa,* and Nico Westerhofc

aDipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università di Torino, Ospedale S. Luigi, Regione Gonzole, I-10039 Orbassano (TO), Italy
bDivision of Biomedical Science, King’s College London, Strand, London, UK
cLaboratory for Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, ICaR-VU, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-11-903-8617; fax: +39-11-903-8639; e-mail: pagliaro@medfarm.unito.it

Objectives: After ischaemic preconditioning (IP), obtained by short episodes of ischaemia, cardiac protection occurs due to a reduction in myocardial metabolism through the activation of A1 adenosine receptors. The antiarrhythmic effect of IP is attributed to an increase in the release of nitric oxide (NO) by the endothelium. On the basis of the above consideration the present investigation studies the changes induced by preconditioning in coronary reactive hyperaemia (RH) and how blockade of A1 receptors and inhibition of NO synthesis can modify these changes. Methods: In anaesthetised goats, an electromagnetic flow-probe was placed around the left circumflex coronary artery. Preconditioning was obtained with two episodes of 2.5 min of coronary occlusion, separated by 5 min of reperfusion. RH was obtained with a 15 s occlusion. In a control group (n=7) RH was studied before and after IP. In a second group (n=7), 0.2 mg kg–1 of 8-cyclopentyl-dipropylxanthine, an A1 receptor blocker, and in a third group (n=7) 10 mg kg–1 of NG-nitro-L-arginine (LNNA), an NO inhibitor, were given before IP. Reactive hyperaemia was again obtained before and after IP. Results: In the control group, after IP, the time to peak hyperaemic flow and total hyperaemic flow decreased by about 50% and 25%, respectively. The A1 receptor blockade alone did not change RH. During A1 blockade, IP reduced the time to peak of RH similar as in control (45%), but did not alter total hyperaemic flow. LNNA alone reduced resting flow and total hyperaemic flow. After NO inhibition, IP only reduced total hyperaemic flow by about 15%, but the time to peak flow was not affected. Conclusions: IP alters RH by decreasing total hyperaemic flow and reducing the time to peak hyperaemic flow. While the former effect is attributed to a reduction in myocardial metabolism through the activation of the A1 receptors, the latter is likely to be due to an increased endothelial release of NO, suggesting that in addition to a protective effect on the myocardium, IP also exerts a direct effect on the responsiveness of the coronary vasculature (vascular preconditioning).

KEYWORDS Ischaemic preconditioning; Coronary flow; Reactive hyperaemia; Adenosine A1 receptors; Endothelium; Nitric oxide


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANGIOLOGYHome page
S. P. Hoole, P. M. Heck, P. A. White, S. N. Khan, M. O'Sullivan, S. C. Clarke, and D. P. Dutka
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Stimulus Does Not Reduce Microvascular Resistance or Improve Myocardial Blood Flow in Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Angiology, August 1, 2009; 60(4): 403 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Physiol. Rev.Home page
N. Westerhof, C. Boer, R. R. Lamberts, and P. Sipkema
Cross-talk between cardiac muscle and coronary vasculature.
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1263 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Penna, P. Pagliaro, R. Rastaldo, F. Di Pancrazio, G. Lippe, D. Gattullo, D. Mancardi, M. Samaja, G. Losano, and I. Mavelli
F0F1 ATP synthase activity is differently modulated by coronary reactive hyperemia before and after ischemic preconditioning in the goat
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H2192 - H2200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Crisafulli, F. Melis, F. Tocco, U. M. Santoboni, C. Lai, G. Angioy, L. Lorrai, G. Pittau, A. Concu, and P. Pagliaro
Exercise-induced and nitroglycerin-induced myocardial preconditioning improves hemodynamics in patients with angina
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): H235 - H242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.