Copyright © 2007, European Society of Cardiology
PEDF induces p53-mediated apoptosis through PPAR gamma signaling in human umbilical vein endothelial cells
aDepartments of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
bDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
cMackay Medicine, Nursing and Management College, Taipei, Taiwan
dSchool of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
eDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
fDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +886 2 28094661x3076; fax: +886 2 28085952. yptsao{at}yahoo.com
Received 11 April 2007; revised 11 June 2007; accepted 28 June 2007
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective Pigment epithelial-derived factor (PEDF) is a potent anti-angiogenic factor whose effects are partially mediated through the induction of endothelial cell apoptosis. The pathway mediating endothelial cell apoptosis has not been fully established. Here we investigated the participation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) and p53 in the apoptosis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).
Methods and results HUVECs pretreated with either PPAR
antagonist or PPAR
small interfering RNA (siRNA) suppressed PEDF-induced apoptosis as determined by TUNEL assay, annexin V-FITC/PI staining, and cleavage of procaspase-8, -9, -3. PEDF sequentially induced PPAR
and p53 expression as observed in immunoblotting and immunofluoresence assays. PEDF also increased the transcriptional activity of PPAR
as evident from electromobility shift assays, and p53 as determined by the phosphorylation and acetylation of p53 and the induction of Bax. The induction of p53 by PEDF was abolished by either PPAR
antagonist or PPAR
siRNA. PEDF-mediated HUVEC apoptosis and cleavage of procaspases were significantly attenuated by p53 siRNA.
Conclusions Our observations indicate that PEDF induces HUVECs apoptosis through the sequential induction of PPAR
and p53 overexpression. With the growing interest in anti-angiogenesis as a novel approach to cancer therapy, defining the mechanism of PEDF-mediated HUVEC apoptosis may facilitate the development of new therapeutics.
KEYWORDS PEDF; Apoptosis; HUVEC; PPAR gamma; p53
This article is referred to in the Editorial by Gaetano et al. (pages 195–196) in this issue.
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The normal vasculature is maintained by a balance between angiogenic factors and anti-angiogenic factors [1,2]. Neovascularization provides a nutrient supply route to the tumor and usually involves a shift towards angioinductive activity [2]. Anti-angiogenic agents can thus be used to fight cancer and other diseases involving neovascularization.
Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), a 50-kDa secreted glycoprotein, is widely expressed throughout the human body [3], with expression decreasing during human hepatocellular carcinoma and breast cancer progression [4–6], choroidal neovascularization in patients with age-related macular degeneration [7], and diabetic retinopathy [8]. PEDF binds to a cell membrane receptor to exhibit multifunctional activity in many cell types but its signaling mechanisms are largely unknown [9,10]. PEDF protects neurons against insults such as glutamate toxicity and oxidative damage and may be a more effective anti-angiogenic factor than angiostatin [3,11]. Systemic injection of recombinant PEDF protein is reported to prevent the development of retinal neovascularization in mice with oxygen-induced ischemic retinopathy by promoting apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells [12].
PEDF exerts anti-angiogenic activity by arresting VEGF- or bFGF-mediated endothelial cell migration [11], inhibiting capillary morphogenesis [13], and inducing endothelial cell apoptosis [12,14–16]. In human dermal microvascular cells, PEDF induces FasL expression and subsequently activation of caspase-8, which initiates the downstream apoptotic cascade [14]. In human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), its induction of apoptosis was shown to depend on p38 MAPK activity and to involve activation of caspases-8 and-9 [16]. It remained unclear whether Fas signaling is also involved in HUVECs apoptosis and how activated p38 MAPK induced activation of multiple caspases.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR
) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor super-family [17]. PPAR
is expressed at low levels in many tissues, including the smooth muscle and endothelial cells of the vessel wall [18]. Exposure of endothelial cells to 15d-PGJ2, a natural ligand of PPAR
, as well as PPAR
overexpression achieved by transient plasmid transfection, each induce caspase-mediated endothelial cell apoptosis [19]. p53 is a well documented pro-apoptotic molecule. It mediates apoptosis primarily via the mitochondrial pathway that induces the release of potent apoptotic activators like cytochrome c [20]. Adenovirus-mediated p53 overexpression in HUVECs has been shown to induce HUVEC apoptosis and inhibit capillary-like differentiation in vitro [21,22]. However, the involvement of PPAR
and p53 in the PEDF-mediated apoptosis has not been studied.
To further our understanding of the mechanism of PEDF-induced apoptosis, we investigated the role of PPAR
and p53 in apoptosis. Our present findings suggest that PEDF activates PPAR
, which in turn leads to overexpression of p53 and apoptosis of HUVECs.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.1 Cell culture and treatment
HUVECs (Cascade Biologics, Inc., Portland, OR, USA) were grown in Medium 200 with Low Serum Growth Supplement (LSGS Kit, supplement contains 1.9% fetal bovine serum, 3 ng/ml bFGF, 10 µg/ml heparin, 1 µg/ml hydrocortisone, and 10 ng/ml EGF). Culture plates were coated with 2% gelatin. Cells (passages 4–8) were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. The recombinant PEDF derived from E. coli was prepared as described previously [23]. Treatments with PEDF (200 ng/ml, unless differently specified), PPAR
inhibitors or caspase inhibitors (Calbiochem) were performed on cells (5x105/ml) seeded in LSGS medium.
2.2 Evaluation of apoptosis
After treatment, the cells were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde for 16 h at 4 °C and then stained using TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL)-based kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) following the manufacturer's instructions. Cell number was monitored by counterstaining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The percentage of TUNEL-positive nuclei was calculated in six randomly selected fields of the three different chambers (
7200 cells). Specimens were examined and photographed on a Zeiss microscope equipped with phase-contrast and epifluorescence optics. Pictures were recorded on Zeiss software. The percentage of HUVECs apoptosis was also confirmed using the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection kit (Roche). Stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACScaliber; Beckman).
2.3 Western blot analysis
Cells were scraped into lysis buffer (150 µL/35 mm well) containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM β-glycerophosphate, 10 µg/mL leupeptin, and 10 µg/mL aprotinin. Total cell lysate was separated into cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions using the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kit (Pierce). Samples containing 20 µg of protein were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE and then were electrotransferred to PVDF membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore) and processed for immunoblot analysis. Antibodies used in this study were for active p38 (Promega), p38/SAPK2, acetyl-p53 (Lys373), caspase-8, caspase-9, and cytochrome c (Upstate Biotechnology), PPAR
, PPARβ, and PPAR
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p53 (Chemicon), phospho-p53 (Ser15 and Ser20), acetylated-p53 (Lys382), and eNOS (Cell Signaling Technology), cleaved caspase-3 (Abcam), β-actin (Sigma). Proteins of interest were detected using the appropriate IgG-HRP secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and ECL reagent (Amersham). X-ray films were scanned on the Model GS-700 Imaging Densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and analyzed using Labworks 4.0 software. For quantification, blots of at least three independent experiments were used.
2.4 Semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from HUVECs with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Synthesis of cDNA was performed with 1 µg of total RNA at 50 °C for 50 min, using oligo (dT) primers and reverse transcriptase (Superscript III, Invitrogen). The amplification mixture (final volume, 25 µl) contained 1xTaq polymerase buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 µM primer pair, and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Life Technologies). cDNA was equalized in an 18–22 cycle amplification reaction with PPAR
primers 5'-caggagcagagcaaagaggtg-3' (forward) and 5'-caaactcaaacttgggctcca-3' (reverse), yielding a 300-bp product. The number of cycles for the PPAR
primer set (denaturation, 20 s, 94 °C; annealing, 30 s, 57 °C; and polymerization, 40 s, 72 °C) was chosen to be in the linear range of amplification.
2.5 Transfection studies
The sequences of PPAR
1 siRNA and control pGL3 siRNA duplexes were synthesized (Dharmacon) as previously described [24]. p53 siRNA was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. For the transfection procedure, cells were grown to 70% confluence, and siRNA was transfected using TransIT-TKO Transfection Reagent (Mirus Corporation). The final concentration of siRNA was 200 nM. By 24 h after siRNA transfection, cells were resuspended in new culture media, and treated with PEDF.
2.6 PPAR
transcriptional activity assay
After treatment, nuclear extracts were collected using a NucBuster protein extraction kit (Novagen), protein concentration was determination by Micro BCA Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Pierce), and the PPAR
transcriptional activity was measured using NoShiftTM II PPAR Transcription Factor Assay Kit (a modified electromobility shift assay; Novagen) as specified by the manufacturer. The specificity of protein binding was established using TransCruzTM Gel Shift PPAR specific and mutant oligonucleotides (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Luminescence was measured by microplate luminometer (Molecular Devices).
2.7 Immunocytochemistry
Cells were plated on 2% gelatin-coated coverslips in LSGS medium. After treatment, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then treated at 4 °C with methanol for 10 min, and blocked with 1% goat serum and 5% BSA for 1 h. Cells were stained with antibodies to PPAR
(1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or p53 (1:1000, Chemicon), incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (1:600 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h, and viewed with an Olympus epi-fluorescence microscope.
2.8 Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments, each done in triplicate (n=3–4 dishes). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine statistically significant differences. P values<0.05 were considered significant.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.1 PPAR
antagonist abolishes PEDF-induced HUVEC apoptosis and caspase activationTo examine the involvement of PPAR
in the signaling of PEDF-induced HUVEC apoptosis, cells were pretreated with PPAR
antagonists (GW9662 or T0070907; 10 µM, 1 h) and then exposed to PEDF for 24 h. The apoptotic cells were assayed by TUNEL staining. As shown in Fig. 1A, both PPAR
antagonists can markedly inhibit PEDF-induced apoptosis. Pretreatment with the broad spectrum caspase inhibitor, zVAD-fmk (20 µM, 1 h), inhibited the PEDF effect, indicating caspase mediation. Quantification of apoptosis by annexin V-conjugated FITC and propidium iodide (PI) staining and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) showed that treatment of HUVECs with PEDF for 24 h increased late apoptotic cells from 3.3±0.6% to 17.2±1.9% and pretreatment with GW9662 suppressed PEDF-induced apoptosis to
4.8±0.9% (Fig. 1B, upper right). Thus, inhibition of PPAR
activity attenuated PEDF-induced HUVEC apoptosis.
|
PEDF-mediated HUVEC apoptosis is associated with cleavage of procaspase-3, -8 and -9 [16]. Pretreatment with the caspase-8 inhibitor or caspase-9 inhibitor (20 µM, 1 h) partially inhibited PEDF-induced apoptosis (13.5±1.8% or 7.1±1.5% versus PEDF+DMSO; 17.2±1.9%). The PEDF-induced apoptosis was almost completely blocked by pretreatment with both inhibitors combined (Fig. 2A). To investigate whether Fas-FasL death cascade is involved in PEDF-induced HUVEC apoptosis, FasL neutralizing antibody (NOK-2) was employed. As shown in Fig. 2B, NOK-2, which effectively blocks PI3/Akt inhibitor (25 µM LY-294002)-induced Jurkat cell apoptosis as previously reported [25], could not protect HUVECs from PEDF-induced apoptosis. This suggests that PEDF-induced HUVEC apoptosis is Fas-independent. Western blot analysis also revealed that treatment with PEDF but not PEDF solvent for 16–24 h significantly increased levels of cleaved caspases-8, -9 and -3 (Fig. 2C). Cytochrome c (Cyt-c) release from mitochondria to the cytosol has been shown to promote caspase-9 activation during apoptosis [20]. Western blot analysis showed a significant increase in Cyt-c release after PEDF treatment for 14 h (Fig. 6A). These studies confirmed that activation of both caspase-8 and -9 is involved in PEDF-triggered apoptosis and that no increased procaspase-8 and -9 cleavages occur at 1–12 h of incubation with PEDF (data not shown). Importantly, the PEDF-induced procaspases cleavages and Cyt-c release were markedly inhibited by pretreatment with GW9662.
|
|
3.2 PEDF induces PPAR
expression and activityTo investigate whether PEDF exposure can induce PPAR
expression, time-course analysis of PPAR
mRNA by RT-PCR was performed and revealed that the level of PPAR
mRNA was increased at 2 h, peaked at 4–6 h, and then dropped at 8 h as compared with an untreated or solvent-treated control (Fig. 3A). When HUVECs were pretreated with actinomycin D for 1.5 h or 3 h prior to PEDF exposure for an additional 6 h, the PPAR
mRNA level was suppressed (Fig. 3B), suggesting the increase of PPAR
mRNA was transcription dependent. The influence of PEDF on PPAR
protein expression assayed by immunoblotting revealed increased expression at 4–8 h and peak expression at 6–8 h as compared with solvent-treated cells (2.7±0.4 fold; after treatment for 6 h; Fig. 3C). Western blots also revealed expression of both PPAR
and PPARβ in HUVECs, but PEDF treatment had no effect on their levels (Fig. 3C). Immunofluorescence analysis of PPAR
localization showed nuclear accumulation of PPAR
protein in untreated cells but increased nuclear and cytoplasmic accumulation of PPAR
protein after treatment with PEDF for 6 h (Fig. 3F). Thus, PPAR
expression was upregulated by PEDF at both the mRNA and protein levels.
|
A recent report indicated that PEDF induces p38 MAPK-dependent HUVEC apoptosis [16]. As shown in Fig. 1A, pretreatment with the p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB203580 markedly abolished PEDF-induced HUVEC apoptosis. In addition, PEDF stimulated a
3 fold increase in p38 MAPK phosphorylation for intervals ranging between 15 and 25 min (Fig. 1C). Therefore, our results confirmed the involvement of p38 MAPK. To investigate the role of the p38 MAPK signaling in PPAR
expression in HUVECs, SB203580 was also tested. RT-PCR analysis revealed that pretreatment with SB203580 completely blocked PEDF-induced PPAR
expression, whereas pretreatment with PD098059 (ERK inhibitor), SP600125 (JNK inhibitor), or DMSO had no such effect (Fig. 3D). Western blot analysis also revealed that pretreatment with SB203580 (but not PD098059 and SP600125) significantly blocked PEDF induction of PPAR
(Fig. 3E). Therefore, we suggest that PEDF induces p38 MAPK activation to upregulate PPAR
expression in HUVECs.
To investigate whether the PPAR
transcriptional activity could be increased after PEDF induction of PPAR
expression, a modified electromobility shift assay was employed to investigate the interaction between PPAR
and its responsive DNA. We found that the exposure of cells to varying concentrations of PEDF for 6 h induced a dose-dependent increase of DNA binding of PPAR
(Fig. 4) suggesting enhancement of PPAR
transcriptional activity. To identify the PPAR
isoform responsible for this effect, HUVECs pretreated with the PPAR
specific inhibitor GW9662 (10 µM, 1 h) before PEDF treatment. The suppression of the DNA binding effect indicates the major binding factor is PPAR
.
|
3.3 PPAR
induction is critical for PEDF-mediated apoptosisThe above results suggest that PPAR
mediates PEDF-induced apoptosis (Figs. 1 and 2
-specific siRNA before PEDF treatment to prevent PPAR
expression. RT-PCR and Western blotting verified that transfection with PPAR
siRNA (but not control siRNA with a sequence unrelated to PPAR
) abolished PEDF induction of PPAR
(Fig. 5A and B). Importantly, compared with control siRNA, PPAR
siRNA significantly reduced PEDF-induced cleavages of procaspases (Fig. 5B) and apoptosis (Fig. 5C). This confirms that PPAR
expression is required for PEDF-mediated apoptosis.
|
3.4 PEDF induces p53 gene expression and activates p53-mediated transcription through PPAR

PPAR
can upregulate p53 gene expression [26]. We performed Western blot analysis to find out whether p53 protein level is increased by PEDF treatment. p53 levels were increased at 6 h after PEDF exposure and peaked at 10–14 h. Moreover, GW9662 pretreatment blocked p53 induction of PEDF (Fig. 6A). Transfection of HUVECs with PPAR
-specific siRNA attenuated PEDF-induced p53 overexpression (Fig. 6B and C), confirming the involvement of PPAR
in p53 induction. Immunofluorescence analysis of p53 localization showed nuclear accumulation of p53 protein before PEDF treatment and increased nuclear and cytoplasmic accumulation as compared with untreated control after treatment for 12 h (Fig. 6D). Thus increase in both PPAR
level and activity is essential for the induction of p53 expression. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activation can be a candidate mechanism mediating endothelial apoptosis [27]. However, PEDF exposure did not change the levels of eNOS protein (Fig. 6A)." Phosphorylation and acetylation of p53 are important for its promoter targeting and influence on cell fate [28,29]. To confirm that the PEDF-induced p53 is transcriptionally active, we investigated posttranslational modifications of p53. As shown in Fig. 7, PEDF stimulation caused increase in p53 acetylation (K373 and K382) and phosphorylation (S15 and S20) in a time-dependent manner, in parallel with PEDF induced increase in the expression of total p53, indicating the overexpressed p53 is modified. Since Bax is a p53 target gene and a marker of p53-mediated proapoptotic effects [28], we investigated whether Bax is induced by PEDF stimulation. As shown in Fig. 7, PEDF treatment induced Bax expression accompanying p53 overexpression.
|
Taken together, our results indicate that PEDF upregulates p53 protein expression and transcriptional activity in HUVECs and these PEDF effects are mediated by PPAR
.
3.5 PEDF triggers p53-dependent HUVEC apoptosis
To verify that PEDF-induced p53 overexpression is required for PEDF-mediated apoptosis, HUVECs were transfected with p53-specific siRNA before PEDF treatment to prevent p53 expression. RT-PCR and Western blotting verified that transfection with p53 siRNA abolished PEDF induction of p53 (Fig. 8A and B). Western blot analysis also revealed that the ability of PEDF to induce procaspase 8, 9 and 3 cleavage was significantly suppressed in p53 siRNA-transfected HUVECs as compared with mock or control siRNA-transfected cells (Fig. 8B). Quantitative analysis of the numbers of TUNEL-positive cells revealed that PEDF-induced apoptosis of p53 siRNA-transfected HUVECs was significantly lower than control siRNA-transfected cells (Fig. 8C, P<0.01). Thus, p53 level also controls PEDF-induced apoptosis.
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Induction of apoptosis of proliferating endothelial cells is an important PEDF anti-angiogenic activity. However, apoptosis regulation by PEDF signaling remains poorly understood. Here we used HUVECs to investigate proapoptotic inducers of PEDF signaling. We demonstrated that PEDF sequentially induces PPAR
and p53 expressions. Blocking any one of these effects caused attenuation of apoptosis. Use of proapoptotic inducers of endothelial cells may provide a new therapeutic avenue to restrict pathological neovascularization.
Our present study is the first to report the participation of PPAR
in PEDF signaling. We found that PEDF increase the expression (Fig. 3) and transcriptional activity (Fig. 4) of PPAR
in HUVECs. To establish the essential role of PPAR
in PEDF effect, we employed PPAR
-specific siRNA and PPAR
antagonist to inhibit PPAR
signaling and demonstrated the prevention of apoptosis (Figs. 1 and 5
C) and caspases activation (Figs. 2C and 5
B). Interestingly, the capability of PPAR
to induce endothelial apoptosis has been demonstrated in a previous report that exposure to PPAR
agonists or transfection-mediated overexpression of PPAR
can stimulate endothelial apoptosis [19]. The connection between PEDF and PPAR
is less clear. However, a recent report indicated that PEDF receptor is a phospholipase A2 (PLA2)-linked cell membrane receptor [10], while PLA2 can enhance the formation of PPAR
ligands to activate PPAR
in vascular endothelial cells [24]. These observations provide possible signaling mechanism between PEDF and PPAR
and support our model that PEDF signals through PPAR
.
Recently, PEDF-mediated HUVEC apoptosis was reported to be associated with activation of p38 MAPK [16]. We further found that treatment with the p38 MAPK inhibitor extensively blocks PPAR
mRNA and protein expression (Fig. 3) indicating that p38 MAPK is upstream to PPAR
in PEDF signaling. The mechanism of p38 MAPK-mediated PPAR
expression remains elusive. It has been found that early growth-response factor-1 (Egr-1) acts as transcriptional activator of PPAR
1 gene [30]. Whether p38 MAPK can regulate Egr-1 activity to promote PPAR
expression in HUVECs awaits further investigation.
Our study is the first to demonstrate that p53 is a mediator of PEDF-induced apoptosis (Fig. 8) and to reveal that PEDF upregulates p53 expression via PPAR
(Fig. 6A and B), identifying p53 as a major target in PPAR
-mediated apoptosis. The demonstration that PPAR
induces p53 expression by binding directly to the promoter region of p53 gene in human MCF7 breast cancer cells [26] suggested that PEDF might induce a similar transcriptional response in HUVECs. However, our results cannot rule out that PPAR
may trigger entry into a proapoptotic state by repressing the expression of survival/anti-apoptotic genes in HUVECs. In that report, association of nuclear receptor corepressor complexes with PPAR
caused NF-
B promoter silencing [31]. NF-
B expressed in ECs is considered important for resistance to many apoptotic stimuli [32]. The potential role of NF-
B in PEDF-mediated cytotoxicity can be tested experimentally.
Previous reports show that PEDF generates anti-angiogenic signals by activating the Fas-FasL death cascade. This effect is prevented in ECs by treatment with neutralizing antibodies against FasL or is absent in mutant mice defective for Fas or FasL [14,33]. Fas-mediated signaling mainly induces procaspase-8 autoproteolytic cleavage, although it may subsequently cause activation of procaspase-9 [34]. Our finding revealed that caspase-9 inhibitor provides more extensive protection than caspase-8 inhibitor from PEDF-induced apoptosis (Fig. 2A). In addition, we found that the FasL neutralizing antibody could not protect HUVECs from PEDF-induced apoptosis (Fig. 2B). These suggest that PEDF-induced apoptosis in HUVECs is Fas-independent and occurs primarily through activation of procaspase-9. In support of this notion, PEDF was found to inhibit ocular angiogenesis in mice deficient in Fas or FasL [35] and induces caspase-9 activation in HUVECs [16]. However, our data do not rule out differences in Fas signaling between HUVECs and ECs from other sources.
Expression of PEDF (an important multifunctional factor) decreases during progression of many diseases. We are the first to show that PPAR
and p53 acts as an apoptotic activator in PEDF-mediated signaling. This finding may contribute in part therapeutic solutions for conditions such as cancer. In addition, the pleiotropic effects of PPAR
and p53 on different cell types may help to explain the multiple biological functions of PEDF.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
We thank Ju-Yun Wu for technical support. This study was supported by grants from the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC 95-2314-B-195-009-MY3, NSC 96-3112-B-195-001) and Mackay Memorial Hospital (MMH- E - 96006).
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- Bouck N., Stellmach V., Hsu S.C. How tumors become angiogenic. Adv Cancer Res (1996) 69:135–174.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Hanahan D., Folkman J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell (1996) 86:353–364.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Barnstable C.J., Tombran-Tink J. Neuroprotective and antiangiogenic actions of PEDF in the eye: molecular targets and therapeutic potential. Prog Retin Eye Res (2004) 23:561–577.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Matsumoto K., Ishikawa H., Nishimura D., Hamasaki K., Nakao K., Eguchi K. Antiangiogenic property of pigment epithelium-derived factor in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology (2004) 40:252–259.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Uehara H., Miyamoto M., Kato K., Ebihara Y., Kaneko H., Hashimoto H., et al. Expression of pigment epithelium-derived factor decreases liver metastasis and correlates with favorable prognosis for patients with ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res (2004) 64:3533–3537.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cai J., Parr C., Watkins G., Jiang W.G., Boulton M. Decreased pigment epithelium-derived factor expression in human breast cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res (2006) 12:3510–3517.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Holekamp N.M., Bouck N., Volpert O. Pigment epithelium-derived factor is deficient in the vitreous of patients with choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol (2002) 134:220–227.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Duh E.J., Yang H.S., Haller J.A., De Juan E., Humayun M.S., Gehlbach P., et al. Vitreous levels of pigment epithelium-derived factor and vascular endothelial growth factor: implications for ocular angiogenesis. Am J Ophthalmol (2004) 137:668–674.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Filleur S., Volz K., Nelius T., Mirochnik Y., Huang H., Zaichuk T.A., et al. Two functional epitopes of pigment epithelial-derived factor block angiogenesis and induce differentiation in prostate cancer. Cancer Res (2005) 65:5144–5152.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Notari L., Baladron V., Aroca-Aguilar J.D., Balko N., Heredia R., Meyer C., et al. Identification of a lipase-linked cell membrane receptor for pigment epithelium-derived factor. J Biol Chem (2006) 281:38022–38037.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Dawson D.W., Volpert O.V., Gillis P., Crawford S.E., Xu H., Benedict W., et al. Pigment epithelium-derived factor: a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis. Science (1999) 285:245–248.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Stellmach V., Crawford S.E., Zhou W., Bouck N. Prevention of ischemia-induced retinopathy by the natural ocular antiangiogenic agent pigment epithelium-derived factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2001) 98:2593–2597.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Kanda S., Mochizuki Y., Nakamura T., Miyata Y., Matsuyama T., Kanetake H. Pigment epithelium-derived factor inhibits fibroblast-growth-factor-2-induced capillary morphogenesis of endothelial cells through Fyn. J Cell Sci (2005) 118:961–970.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Volpert O.V., Zaichuk T., Zhou W., Reiher F., Ferguson T.A., Stuart P.M., et al. Inducer-stimulated Fas targets activated endothelium for destruction by anti-angiogenic thrombospondin-1 and pigment epithelium-derived factor. Nat Med (2002) 8:349–357.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Doll J.A., Stellmach V.M., Bouck N.P., Bergh A.R., Lee C., Abramson L.P., et al. Pigment epithelium-derived factor regulates the vasculature and mass of the prostate and pancreas. Nat Med (2003) 9:774–780.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Chen L., Zhang S.S., Barnstable C.J., Tombran-Tink J. PEDF induces apoptosis in human endothelial cells by activating p38 MAP kinase dependent cleavage of multiple caspases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2006) 348:1288–1295.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Mangelsdorf D.J., Evans R.M. The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors. Cell (1995) 83:841–850.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Gurnell M., Savage D.B., Chatterjee V.K., O—Rahilly S. The metabolic syndrome: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
and its therapeutic modulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2003) 88:2412–2421.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bishop-Bailey D., Hla T. Endothelial cell apoptosis induced by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) ligand 15-deoxy-Delta12, 14-prostaglandin J2. J Biol Chem (1999) 274:17042–17048.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Moll U.M., Marchenko N., Zhang X.K. p53 and Nur77/TR3-transcription factors that directly target mitochondria for cell death induction. Oncogene (2006) 25:4725–4743.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Riccioni T., Cirielli C., Wang X., Passaniti A., Capogrossi M.C. Adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 overexpression inhibits endothelial cell differentiation in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo. Gene Ther (1998) 5:747–754.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Teodoro J.G., Parker A.E., Zhu X., Green M.R. p53-mediated inhibition of angiogenesis through up-regulation of a collagen prolyl hydroxylase. Science (2006) 313:968–971.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Tsao Y.P., Ho T.C., Chen S.L., Cheng H.C. Pigment epithelium-derived factor inhibits oxidative stress-induced cell death by activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases in cultured retinal pigment epithelial cells. Life Sci (2006) 79:545–550.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Liu Y., Zhu Y., Rannou F., Lee T.S., Formentin K., Zeng L., et al. Laminar flow activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in vascular endothelial cells. Circulation (2004) 110:1128–1133.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Uriarte S.M., Joshi-Barve S., Song Z., Sahoo R., Gobejishvili L., Jala V.R., et al. Akt inhibition upregulates FasL, downregulates c-FLIPs and induces caspase-8-dependent cell death in Jurkat T lymphocytes. Cell Death Differ (2005) 12:233–242.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Bonofiglio D., Aquila S., Catalano S., Gabriele S., Belmonte M., Middea E., et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activates p53 gene promoter binding to the nuclear factor-kappaB sequence in human MCF7 breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol (2006) 20:3083–3092.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cai H. Hydrogen peroxide regulation of endothelial function: origins, mechanisms, and consequences. Cardiovasc Res (2005) 68:26–36.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Knights C.D., Catania J., Di Giovanni S., Muratoglu S., Perez R., Swartzbeck A., et al. Distinct p53 acetylation cassettes differentially influence gene-expression patterns and cell fate. J Cell Biol (2006) 173:533–544.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Mujtaba S., He Y., Zeng L., Yan S., Plotnikova O., Sachchidanand, et al. Structural mechanism of the bromodomain of the coactivator CBP in p53 transcriptional activation. Mol Cell (2004) 13:251–263.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Fu M., Zhang J., Lin Y., Zhu X., Ehrengruber M.U., Chen Y.E. Early growth response factor-1 is a critical transcriptional mediator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma 1 gene expression in human aortic smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem (2002) 277:26808–26814.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pascual G., Fong A.L., Ogawa S., Gamliel A., Li A.C., Perissi V., et al. A SUMOylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR-gamma. Nature (2005) 437:759–763.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Weber C., Erl W. Modulation of vascular cell activation, function, and apoptosis: role of antioxidants and nuclear factor-kappa B. Curr Top Cell Regul (2000) 36:217–235.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Abe R., Shimizu T., Yamagishi S., Shibaki A., Amano S., Inagaki Y., et al. Overexpression of pigment epithelium-derived factor decreases angiogenesis and inhibits the growth of human malignant melanoma cells in vivo. Am J Pathol (2004) 164:1225–1232.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Barnhart B.C., Alappat E.C., Peter M.E. The CD95 type I/type II model. Semin Immunol (2003) 15:185–193.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Barreiro R., Schadlu R., Herndon J., Kaplan H.J., Ferguson T.A. The role of Fas-FasL in the development and treatment of ischemic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2003) 44:1282–1286.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Zheng, H. Chen, H. Zhao, K. Liu, D. Luo, Y. Chen, Y. Chen, X. Yang, Q. Gu, and X. Xu Inhibition of JAK2/STAT3-Mediated VEGF Upregulation under High Glucose Conditions by PEDF through a Mitochondrial ROS Pathway In Vitro Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2010; 51(1): 64 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kawaguchi, S.-i. Yamagishi, M. Itou, K. Okuda, S. Sumie, R. Kuromatsu, M. Sakata, M. Abe, E. Taniguchi, H. Koga, et al. Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor Inhibits Lysosomal Degradation of Bcl-xL and Apoptosis in HepG2 cells Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2010; 176(1): 168 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-C. Ho, S.-L. Chen, Y.-C. Yang, T.-H. Lo, J.-W. Hsieh, H.-C. Cheng, and Y.-P. Tsao Cytosolic phospholipase A2-{alpha} is an early apoptotic activator in PEDF-induced endothelial cell apoptosis Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2009; 296(2): C273 - C284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-C. Ho, S.-L. Chen, Y.-C. Yang, C.-Y. Chen, F.-P. Feng, J.-W. Hsieh, H.-C. Cheng, and Y.-P. Tsao 15-Deoxy-{Delta}(12,14)-prostaglandin J2 Induces Vascular Endothelial Cell Apoptosis through the Sequential Activation of MAPKS and p53 J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2008; 283(44): 30273 - 30288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tsuzuki and Y. Kawakami Tumor angiogenesis suppression by {alpha}-eleostearic acid, a linolenic acid isomer with a conjugated triene system, via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2008; 29(4): 797 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gaetano, C. Colussi, and M. C. Capogrossi PEDF, PPAR-{delta}, p53: Deadly circuits arise when worlds collide Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2007; 76(2): 195 - 196. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||













