© 2003 by European Society of Cardiology
Copyright © 2003, European Society of Cardiology
Inhibitory G-proteins and their role in desensitization of the adenylyl cyclase pathway in heart failure
aInstitut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg–Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
bInstitut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Germany
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-40-428032180; fax: +49-40-428034876. Email address: t.eschenhagen{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de
Received 24 July 2003; revised 3 September 2003; accepted 10 September 2003
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heart failure is accompanied by stereotypic alterations in cardiac gene expression. These changes are most likely secondary in the pathogenesis and can be viewed as protective, e.g. as energy-saving mechanisms, but at the same time, they aggravate contractile dysfunction and the deficit of failing cardiac myocytes to respond to altered hemodynamic needs. One of the best-studied, paradigmatic examples of this dichotomy is heterologous desensitization of the cardiac adenylyl cyclase (AC) signaling pathway. It protects against detrimental consequences of the excessive adrenergic drive, but it also blunts the most powerful inotropic support of the heart. Desensitization is associated with downregulation of β-adrenergic receptors, increased β-adrenoceptor kinases and increased inhibitory G protein
-subunits, G
i. Whereas a causative role of the former is generally accepted, the role of the increase in G
i has remained controversial for many years. The present article summarizes early and novel findings that, in the view of the authors, provide solid evidence for G
i to play an important role in the adaptation of cardiac AC to various pathophysiological conditions.
KEYWORDS G-proteins; Beta-adrenergic desensitization; Heart failure; Adenovirus; Betablocker
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cardiac β-adrenergic signaling system mediates most effects of neuronally released and circulating catecholamines and represents the most powerful regulatory input into the heart. It mediates acute effects such as the increase in force of contraction (inotropism), rate of cardiac relaxation (lusitropism), heart rate (chronotropism), and impulse conduction through the AV node (dromotropism). However, chronic β-adrenoceptor-mediated hypertrophic and proapoptotic actions of catecholamines are being increasingly recognized and may be of similar importance. The β-adrenergic signaling system is a paradigmatic example of a G protein-coupled receptor system, where the biological response is initiated by binding of a ligand to a specific receptor, which as a consequence of ligand binding, undergoes a conformational change that, in case of an agonist, triggers activation of guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) and finally ACs to synthesize the second messenger cAMP from ATP. Increased intracellular cAMP in turn activates cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), which then phosphorylates target proteins such as cardiac Ca2+ channels, the Ca2+-release channel, phospholamban, and troponin I whose change in activity cause the physiological responses mentioned above.
Patients with terminal heart failure exhibit a relative or absolute refractoriness to catecholamines in vitro and in vivo. Similar phenomena has been observed at the level of isolated muscle preparations or isolated cells from patients with heart failure [1,2]. The reduction in β-adrenergic contractile responsiveness is reflected by reduced stimulation of cAMP synthesis in broken heart membranes and has been termed desensitization of β-adrenergic receptor-mediated activation of AC [3]. It is associated with a decrease in β-adrenergic receptor density [1], uncoupling of β-adrenergic receptors from Gs as a consequence of increased β-adrenergic receptor kinase (β-ARK=GRK 2) activity [4,5], as well as increased G
i protein and transcript levels [6–9]. In concert, these molecular alterations are assumed to account for desensitization, and thereby, for the blunted contractile response to catecholamines in heart failure, but the role of each alteration alone is difficult to evaluate since they occur simultaneously. The present article will discuss established mechanisms with a focus on G
i.
| 2. G-proteins implicated in AC regulation in the heart |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mammalian heart expresses the long and the short isoform of G
s, as well as the structurally and functionally closely related G
i-2, G
i-3 and two or three G
o subunits (for review, see Ref. [10]) with G
i-2 being the quantitatively prevailing G
i/o isoform in human atrium and ventricle [9,11–13]. When the G
i/o family has been collectively inactivated by pertussis toxin (PTX), the main consequences of muscarinic and adenosine receptor stimulation in the heart are lost. These include the inhibition of heart rate (likely involving inhibition of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated cation channel, HCN4, and L-type calcium channels), inhibition of atrial force (via activation of IKACh) and the accentuated antagonism of β-adrenergic positive inotropy in the ventricle (likely via inhibition of AC and subsequently L-type calcium channels). Experiments in knockout mice extended these conclusions and suggest that G
o is essential for muscarinic inhibition of L-type calcium currents in ventricular myocytes, but not in muscarinic activation of IKACh in atrial cells [14,15]. In embryonic stem cell-derived, atrial-like cardiomyocytes G
i-2 and G
i-3 appear to modulate the kinetics of muscarinic inhibition of L-type calcium currents without being necessary for full inhibition [15]. Surprisingly, the question whether or not the latter effect involves the NO/cGMP pathway remains highly controversial with several papers in favor and an even greater number against this idea (for discussion, see Ref. [16]). One reason for this confusion may be the developmental dependency of the mechanism of the muscarinic inhibition of isoprenaline-stimulated ICa. In one study, muscarinic inhibition of isoprenaline-stimulated ICa was entirely dependent on the NO/cGMP pathway at early stages of cardiac development, whereas it was dependent on Gi/AC coupling and insensitive to NOS inhibition at later stages [17]. Thus, it remains unclear whether the present conclusions with regard to G
o and G
i-2/i-3 apply to the adult cardiac myocyte. Whereas G
s directly stimulates AC, the mechanisms of AC inhibition by Gi proteins has remained somewhat obscure, mainly because it has been difficult to demonstrate direct inhibitory interaction of GTP-G
i with AC. However, in membranes from SF9 cells expressing the cardiac AC isoforms V or VI recombinant myristoylated G
i-1, G
i-2 and G
i-3, but not G
o concentration-dependently inhibited cyclase activity, both in the presence and absence of G
s, indicating that activated G
i binds directly to an inhibitory binding site on AC [18]. Additionally, the inhibitory action of Gi on AC activity may be due to the release of β
subunits that either scavenge G
s or directly inhibit AC. The latter hypothesis has gained support from data showing that overexpression of β
subunits suppresses AC type V and VI activity in COS-7 cells [19], but is in contrast to former data on isolated proteins showing that the cardiac AC isoforms V and VI are insensitive to β
subunits [20]. The heart also expresses G
q and G
11 that mediate hypertrophic actions of angiotensin II, endothelin, norepinephrine (via
1A adrenoceptors). Evidence exists for negative cross-talk between the receptor/Gq/phospholipase C and the Gs/AC pathway, e.g. at the level of phospholipase C [21]. Moreover, most Gq-coupled receptors also activate Gi pathways and thereby inhibit Gs signals (see below). Transgenic overexpression of Gq causes cardiac hypertrophy, decreased contractility, AC activity and β-adrenergic responsiveness in mice and this phenotype was partly or fully prevented by cross-bred with mice overexpressing AC type V [22] or VI [23]. The mechanisms of this unexpected interaction is unresolved, but unlikely reflects direct interaction between Gq and AC. | 3. Heart failure and sympathetic activation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Systolic heart failure (isolated diastolic dysfunction is not discussed here) represents a clinical endpoint secondary to various cardiac diseases. Irrespective of the underlying etiology, the hallmark of all forms is the impairment of cardiac contractile function. Autocrine, paracrine, and neurohormonal mechanisms are activated to increase blood pressure and to maintain blood flow to vital organs [24]. These compensatory mechanisms include activation of the sympathetic nervous system, increased activity of the renin–angiotensin [25] and endothelin system [26,27], and increased release of vasopressin [28]. The parallel increase in natriuretic factors (ANP, BNP) on the other hand partly balances the load-increasing actions of the other systems [29].
Plasma norepinephrine concentrations are increased in patients with heart failure, at rest [24] and during exercise [30]. A substudy of the SOLVD study [31] revealed that serum norepinephrine levels were already increased in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular function and, in contrast to ANP and vasopressin, were strongly predictive of outcome [32]. While the heart extracts norepinephrine from plasma in normal subjects, norepinephrine spillover from sympathetic nerve endings exceeds uptake in patients with symptomatic heart failure and makes the heart the most important source of systemic noradrenaline [33]. The increased local sympathetic activity in myocardial tissue is accompanied by a decreased number of presynaptic norepinephrine uptake sites [34], leading to an increased norepinephrine concentration in the synaptic cleft. Cardiac norepinephrine spillover is inversely correlated with the survival of the patients and the local cardiac spillover precedes the generalized sympathetic activation in patients with heart failure [34]. This and the fact that nearly all molecular alterations observed in the failing human heart can be induced experimentally by sustained β-adrenergic stimulation both in cultured cells and in whole animal experiments [11] provide strong evidence that the alterations in gene expression leading to desensitization of receptor-stimulated AC in the failing human heart are secondary to the increased sympathetic nervous activity. The impact of other neurohumoral system on the cardiac AC pathway is less well understood. Part of the actions of angiotensin II on the heart are due to the release of norepinephrine [35] and endothelin [36,37]. Endothelin, angiotensin II and natriuretic peptide type C receptors exhibit dual coupling to stimulation of phospholipase C and of Gi-mediated inhibition of AC [38–40]. Infusion of endothelin induced upregulation of β-adrenergic receptors and of G
s proteins in cardiac membranes [41], i.e. changes functionally opposite to those seen after infusion of catecholamines. Thus, there is evidence that the peptidergic systems rather counteract the actions of catecholamines on cardiac AC pathways.
| 4. Does desensitization of the AC pathway explain the decreased contractile reserve in heart failure? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In ventricular preparations from explanted human hearts with idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy, the positive inotropic response to catecholamines and their effect on AC activity is markedly diminished [1,42,43]. In contrast, the force-increasing effect of cAMP-independent compounds such as ouabain [42,44], sodium channel agonists [45], calcium channel agonists and calcium itself has been found to be unchanged at low frequency of stimulation [42,43,46–49]. Data with regard to the AC stimulator forskolin, whose effect is partly depending on G
s, are conflicting. Some authors found preserved positive inotropic effects in the failing human myocardium [42,43], others a significant decrease [48]. The efficacy of the membrane-permeable cAMP derivative dibutyryl-cAMP was found to be unchanged in isolated human trabeculae [48], but reduced in isolated human cardiac myocytes [49]. The key findings were confirmed at the single myocyte level [2], demonstrating that the defect is inherent to the single motor unit of the heart. Collectively, these data provided unambiguous evidence that the failing myocardium is principally able to develop normal maximal contractile force (at this point, alterations in the force–frequency relation, twitch kinetics, calcium handling and myofilament ATPase activity are not discussed (see Ref. [50]), and that blunted cAMP-generation by the receptor–G protein–AC system is of central importance for the reduced inotropic reserve of the failing human heart. | 5. What is the role of the Gi proteins increase for desensitization of the cardiac AC pathway? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The first evidence that alterations beyond the receptor level might occur in heart failure was provided by assessing agents bypassing the β-adrenergic receptors. At that time surprisingly, the positive inotropic effect of cAMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors was found to be diminished in isolated preparations from failing human myocardium as much as that of catecholamines [42–44]. The diminished inotropic response is not due to changes in PDE activity or its susceptibility to pharmacological inhibition because both were found to be indistinguishable in normal and failing human myocardium [51,52]. These data argued for a diminished (basal) cAMP production underlying the diminished response to PDE inhibitors [42]. Also, the heterologous nature of desensitization of receptor-stimulated AC, i.e. the blunted response to histamine, glucagon and vasointestinal peptide [42,43,53,54], cannot be explained by downregulation of β-adrenoceptors. Thus, the independent demonstration of upregulation of G
i in human heart failure by two independent groups [6,7] raised much attention and was subsequently confirmed by several groups [8,11,55,56]. As the three mentioned molecular abnormalities generally occur in parallel, the specific role of each alteration remains difficult to define. Several lines of evidence suggest that the decrease in β-adrenergic receptors accounts for an important part of the decreased inotropic response to β-adrenergic agonists [57]. The human heart contains only a small fraction of "spare receptors", which is further reduced with increasing severity of heart failure [58]. Accordingly, the density of β-adrenergic receptors correlates well with the magnitude of β-adrenergic inotropic responses in different stages of human heart failure [59,60]. The increase in βARK, a kinase that uncouples β-adrenergic receptors from AC signaling, also appears to play a role on its own, since mice overexpressing βARK showed suppressed isoprenaline-stimulation of cAMP production [61] and overexpression of a peptide inhibitor of β-ARK leads to enhanced cardiac contractility in vivo with or without isoprenaline stimulation.
In contrast, the role of G
i remained somewhat obscure. The reasons are severalfold. (1) G
i does not directly participate in the β-adrenergic signaling pathway. (2) As outlined above the exact mechanism of the G
i-mediated inhibition of AC had been a matter of debate. (3) G
i is physiologically expressed at high levels. The concentration amounts to 1–5 pmol/mg protein in human hearts [13], whereas the density of most receptors including the β-adrenergic receptor ranges between 50 and 500 fmol/mg protein, i.e. >10-fold lower. It has been argued therefore that a 40–100% increase is unlikely to have a strong impact on the system. (4) In some animal models of heart failure or hypertrophy, G
i reportedly remains unchanged and G
s is downregulated (for review, see Ref. [11]).
Yet, we believe that none of these arguments holds against an important role of G
i in heart failure and that recent findings provide strong evidence for such a role.
Early arguments for a role of the G
i increase were as follows. (1) The increase in G
i, in contrast to reduced β-adrenoceptors, can well account for the heterologous nature of desensitization of receptor-stimulated AC (e.g., reduced response to histamine) as well as the observed decrease in GTP-dependent AC stimulation [11]. (2) The increase in myocardial G
i levels occurs as one of the earliest events in animal models of hypertension [62,63] and parallels the blunted response to β-adrenergic stimulation in heart failure induced by myocardial infarction in rat [56]. Temporal inactivation of Gi/Go proteins by pertussis toxin injection in prehypertensive SHR rats delayed the development of hypertension [64] (3) PTX catalyzed inactivation of Gi/Go proteins restored AC stimulation by β-adrenergic agonists [7] as well as the inotropic response of isolated failing human cardiac myocytes to isoprenaline [55]. (4) The age-related decrease in β-adrenergic effects in mice overexpressing β2-adrenergic receptors correlates with an increase in G
i and is reversible upon treatment with PTX [65]. (5) Activation of G
i opposes the pro-apoptotic action of β1-adrenoceptor stimulation in cardiomyocytes [66–69]. (6) Clinical improvement of heart failure patients treated with β-adrenoceptor blockers is accompanied by normalization of G
i expression level [70]. Yet, all of this evidence was circumstantial.
Strong direct evidence for an important role of G
i in desensitization of receptor-stimulated AC and in the regulation of contractility and electrical conduction was provided recently by the use of recombinant adenovirus [71–73]. Rau et al. [71] tested whether overexpression of wild-type G
i-2 affects G protein-dependent AC in cardiac myocytes by the use of two replication-deficient adenoviruses encoding rat G
i-2 alone (Ad5G
i-2) and G
i-2+green fluorescent protein (bicistronic; Ad5G
i-2/GFP), as well as two control viruses (Ad5LacZ, Ad5GFP). Infection of neonatal rat cardiac myocytes with Ad5G
i-2 for two days virus dose-dependently increased G
i-2 levels by 1.5- to 7-fold. In parallel, both GTP- and isoprenaline-stimulated AC in broken membranes and isoprenaline-stimulated cAMP accumulation in intact cells were suppressed by 10–70% and 50–90%, respectively (Fig. 1A). Treatment with PTX abolished the Ad5G
i-2 effect at lower levels of overexpression (G
i-2 150% above control). At a targeted level of G
i-2 overexpression of
90% above control (i.e., levels of overexpression seen in human heart failure), isoprenaline-stimulated AC was significantly reduced by 17% and cAMP accumulation by 40% (Fig. 1B). Importantly, the levels of G
s, Gβ and β-adrenoceptors were unaffected by Ad5G
i-2/GFP or Ad5GFP infection under these conditions. These data are the first direct demonstration that increases in wild-type G
i-2 suppress β-adrenergic stimulation of cardiac AC. Janssen et al. [72] and Rau et al. [71] observed that adenoviral G
i-2 overexpression in isometric contracting multicellular preparations and single myocytes from rabbit and rat, respectively, markedly attenuated the inotropic response to isoprenaline (by 60–80%, Fig. 2). These data underline that increased G
i-2 alone is sufficient to attenuate the positive inotropic effects of β-adrenergic stimulation in myocardium. Furthermore, Donahue et al. [73] showed that overexpression of wild-type G
i-2 by infusion of Ad5G
i-2 in the AV region of pig hearts reduced ventricular beating rate after the induction of atrial fibrillation (Fig. 3). A surprising aspect of these findings was the magnitude of the effect of G
i-2 overexpression on cardiac function, raising the question by which mechanism an increase of G
i-2 protein leads to desensitization of receptor-stimulated AC in the heart.
|
|
|
| 6. How does an increase in Gi proteins translate into desensitization of the AC pathway? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One reason may lie in the observation that G-coupled receptors exert constitutive activity, i.e. they interact with the heterotrimeric G protein in the absence of agonists. Thus, the presence of more G
i-2 may amplify the inhibitory influence of constitutively active Gi-coupled receptors. This mechanism is supported by studies demonstrating constitutive activity of muscarinic acetylcholine or A1 adenosine receptors [74,75]. However, the inverse muscarinic agonist atropine reversed the inhibitory effect of G
i-2 overexpression on cAMP levels only partially [71], suggesting that additional mechanisms or signals from other Gi-coupled receptors explain the effect. Candidates are the A1-adenosine receptor and, according to data of Xiao et al. [76], also the β2-adrenergic receptor. In this respect, a recent study showed that the β-adrenoceptor agonist ICI 118,551 exerted a negative inotropic effect only in cardiac myocytes in which the concentration of G
i-2 was supranormal, e.g. in myocytes from failing human hearts (Fig. 4), β2-adrenoceptor overexpressing TG4 mice and in normal cells overexpressing G
i-2 [77]. The hypothesis generated from these data was that binding of the inverse agonist ICI 118,551 directs the β2-adrenoceptor to a G
i-2-coupled form producing a direct negative inotropic effect. An alternative mechanism to explain the strong effect of G
i-2 overexpression could be that G
i-2 exerts some intrinsic activity in its own, i.e. a certain fraction spontaneously releases GDP, binds GTP and exerts biological effects. This fraction would be, in absolute terms, increased by overexpression. It is difficult to separate these effects. But the common observation that preparations of recombinant and native Gi/Go proteins (in contrast to G
s) exhibit strong basal binding activity of GTP or photoaffinity-modified GTP analogues and that Gi/Go-coupled receptor agonists exert only a modest stimulatory effect [78,79] argue for a significant intrinsic GDP-release activity of wild-type Gi, too. The fact that the effect of high overexpression levels of G
i-2 was insensitive to PTX (Fig. 1A; Ref. [71]) also argues for some constitutive activity, because PTX-mediated ADP-ribosylation of the C-terminal cysteine residue of G
i impairs interaction with receptors, but not with effectors [80]. PTX can therefore not reverse the effect of constitutively active G
i [81]. A third possibility is that overexpression of G
i-2 acts as a scavenger of β
-subunits and thereby impairs signaling through the Gs pathway. An argument that may argue against this hypothesis (but does not exclude this possibility) is that overexpression of βARKct, another scavenger of Gβ
, increases AC stimulation [61].
|
In any case, the study of Rau et al. [71] directly demonstrated that the Gi-coupled signaling system as a whole exerts activity in the absence of receptor agonists and that this activity is increased with increasing concentrations of G
i-2. This strongly supports the concept of "tonic Gi activity" as deduced from several earlier observations. (a) Addition of GTP (-analogues) can inhibit forskolin-stimulated AC activity [82] and stimulate potassium channels [83] which would be difficult to explain without a significant basal exchange activity. (b) Purified membrane preparations loaded with labeled GDP spontaneously release GDP mainly from the Gi/Go protein fraction in a temperature-dependent manner [84]. (c) Treatment of isolated cardiac myocytes or whole animals with PTX increased arrhythmogenic [85] or AC-stimulating [86] effects of β-adrenergic agonists. Furthermore, isolated murine myocytes responded to zinterol only when pre-incubated with PTX and not in the native state [87] and the age-related decrease in β-adrenergic effects in β2-adrenergic receptor overexpressing mice (TG4) were paralleled by an increase in G
i protein levels and was reversible upon treatment with PTX [65]. (d) Overexpression of G
i-2 by infusion of Ad5G
i-2 in the AV region of pig hearts reduced ventricular beating rate after the induction of atrial fibrillation (Fig. 3, Ref. [73]).
Overexpression of G
i-2 suppressed β1- and β2-adrenoceptor-mediated stimulation of cAMP levels to a similar extend [71]. This was surprising because specific coupling of β2-adrenergic receptors to G
i as proposed by Xiao et al. [87] would have predicted differential affection of β1 and β2 adrenoceptor effects. Yet, restoration or enhancement of β2-adrenergic effects by PTX does not necessarily prove direct coupling because it can be as well explained by relieving the tonic inhibitory activity of Gi pathways on stimulatory AC pathways. Thus, recent experiments showed that PTX treatment sensitized the inotropic effects of β1-adrenergic stimulation in mice where, surprisingly, no inotropic or chronotropic effects of β2-adrenergic stimulation were observed at all [88].
| 7. Is desensitization of the AC signaling pathway helpful or deleterious in heart failure? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As discussed above, in systolic heart failure the sympathetic nervous system is activated to stimulate myocardial function and maintain circulatory needs of the body. The higher the adrenergic drive, the more profound is the degree of β-adrenergic desensitization and thereby the lesser the inotropic response and cardiac output, which in turn leads to even greater adrenergic activation. Increased G
i activity in this situation may on the one hand represent an element of this vicious cycle with detrimental effects on contractility and exercise tolerance. But it is clear that, on the other hand, increased G
i activity has also beneficial effects by protecting the heart from β-adrenergic overstimulation that would cause energy deprivation, apoptosis and potentially fatal arrhythmias.
As discussed above, an increase in G
i protein levels as seen in failing human hearts participates in desensitization of the AC signaling pathway and the reduced inotropic responses to catecholamines. Autoantibodies that activate M2 acetylcholine receptors have been found in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy [89] and may increase the impact of Gi-mediated inhibition of receptor-stimulated AC. These findings could be interpreted as to suggest that increased Gi signaling may play a causal role in dilated cardiomyopathy. Consistent with this idea, conditional, cardiac-specific expression of a modified Gi-coupled opioid receptor with constitutive activity in transgenic mice resulted in dilated cardiomyopathy, overt heart failure, ECG changes, arrhythmia, and increased mortality [90]. This study elegantly demonstrates that overstimulation of Gi-coupled signaling pathways is sufficient to cause cardiomyopathy and thereby establishes a link between increased activity of G
i and cardiomyopathy in general. However, transgenic overexpression of a given element of a signaling cascade at unphysiologically high levels creates an artificial situation that does not allow valid conclusions as to the role of alterations in the expression of the respective signaling element under pathophysiological conditions.
In fact, the evidence for a mostly protective role is prevailing. Patients with heart failure with mild to moderate heart failure (NYHA II–III) most often die from a sudden, arrhythmogenic event, whereas patients with end-stage disease (NYHA IV) most often die from progressive heart failure [91] and bradyarrhythmic events [92]. The latter patients are expected to exhibit a high degree of β-adrenoceptor downregulation and increase in G
i. So, it was tempting to speculate that these alterations in end-stage human heart failure serve as a protective antiarrhythmic mechanism. Several animal studies support this hypothesis. For example, pacing-induced heart failure in dogs is accompanied by a reduction in β-adrenoceptor density, an increase in G
i [93], and a reduced arrhythmogenic effect of catecholamines [94]. Infusion of carbachol in rats for 4 days led to a decrease in cardiac PTX-sensitive G
i proteins and a reduction in M-cholinoceptor density. This was accompanied by a modestly reduced inotropic effects of carbachol, but a marked sensitization of isolated papillary muscles to the arrhythmogenic effects of isoprenaline or forskolin in vitro [95]. Infusion of isoprenaline, that increased G
i protein levels, decreased the incidence of isoprenaline- and forskolin-induced arrhythmias in vitro. Grimm et al. [85] found that a dose-dependent PTX-mediated inactivation of G
i in vivo closely correlated with an increase in the arrhythmogenic effects of isoprenaline or forskolin. Other groups also observed, without specifically focussing on arrhythmias, an increase in β-adrenoceptor-mediated automaticity in isolated PTX-treated rat ventricular cardiomyocytes [76]. These findings are in favour of the notion that the increase of G
i could be a protective mechanism to prevent arrhythmias during excessive sympathetic stimulation, such as in heart failure.
Recent evidence underline distinct differences between β1- and β2-adrenoceptors in their chronic effects on cardiac myocytes. Whereas mice overexpressing the human β2-adrenoceptor in the heart exhibit cardiac hypercontractility and develop dysfunction only at late stages [96,97], β1-adrenoceptor overexpressing mice quickly develop heart failure [98]. One reason may be a difference in the ability to promote apoptosis [91–93]. Stimulation of β1-adrenoceptors increases apoptosis via a cAMP-dependent mechanism, whereas stimulation of β2-adrenoceptors appears to inhibit apoptosis via a Gi-coupled pathway [66]. Thus, the muscarinic agonist carbachol inhibited β-adrenoceptor-mediated apoptosis and PTX, which inhibits Gi, increased the magnitude of β-adrenoceptor-stimulated apoptosis and mimicked the effect of β2-adrenoceptor blockade. Gi might oppose the actions of Gs by inhibiting the activation of AC and/or by activating phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase [68]. A protective role of upregulating Gi is further supported by recent data that a cross-bred of β2-adrenoceptor transgenic and G
i-2 knockout mice showed extensive cardiomegaly and markedly decreased survival rates (S. Herzig, Cologne, personal communication).
| 8. Clinical consequences |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The increase in G
i in human heart failure can be viewed as a good example of an adaptational response of the heart: necessary as a protection against arrhythmia and apoptosis, but also detrimental in terms of contractile reserve. Therapeutic strategies to directly activate or inhibit G
i function are not in sight and, given the dichotomic character of the G
i increase, unlikely to be successful. What should be a reasonable strategy, however, is to reduce the "need for the increase in G
i" in human heart failure. Indeed, this concept is already been in clinical use and has proven highly effective in the treatment of chronic heart failure, namely the use of β-blockers. Some years ago, we could show in a small study in patients with NYHA class II–III heart failure that a 3-month treatment with metoprolol not only induces upregulation of β-adrenergic receptors but also a decrease, i.e. relative normalization of G
i-2 levels in myocardial biopsies [70]. In light of the recent findings discussed above, the decrease in G
i induced by metoprolol, even though modest, is likely to contribute to the improved exercise tolerance demonstrated in the same patients [70]. The decrease in G
i-2 upon treatment may be even more relevant than the increase in β-adrenergic receptor density given that the continued presence of the β-blocker will at least partly block the effect of endogenous catecholamines. The concept that arises from these data is that the β-blocker reduces the continuous stimulatory input exerted by increased norepinephrine and thereby reduces the signal that downregulates β-adrenergic receptors and upregulates G
i proteins. Thus, the β-blocker allows the cardiac signaling system to return towards a normal state. In contrast to any direct intervention such as overexpression of β-adrenergic receptors or inactivation of G
i proteins the normalization of cardiac signaling occurs just to an extent that corresponds to the balance between increased norepinephrine and the concentration of the β-blocker. In other words, the biological system remains in a balanced state, but at different (activity) levels of signaling components. Thus, normalization of G
i protein in patients treated with β-blockers is beneficial (and not deleterious as its acute inactivation by PTX), because the β-blocker blocks the proarrhythmic and proapoptotic action of norepinephrine. And on the other hand, the normalization of G
i proteins relieves the tonic inhibition of AC and allows stimulatory inputs from all Gs-coupled receptors (β-adrenergic receptors will participate under exercise) to increase force of contraction and cardiac output of patients with heart failure.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Es 88/8-2, GRK 750) and the Johannes und Frieda Marohn-Stiftung (Arm/00).
| Notes |
|---|
Time for primary review 21 days
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- Bristow M.R., Ginsburg R., Minobe W., et al. Decreased catecholamine sensitivity and beta-adrenergic receptor density in failing human hearts. N. Engl. J. Med. (1982) 307:205–211.[Abstract]
- Harding S.E., MacLeod K.T., Jones S.M., Vescovo G., Poole-Wilson P.A. Contractile responses of myocytes isolated from patients with cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. (1991) 12(Suppl. D):44–48.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hadcock J.R., Ros M., Watkins D.C., Malbon C.C. Cross-regulation between G-protein-mediated pathways. Stimulation of AC increases expression of the inhibitory G-protein, Gi alpha 2. J. Biol. Chem. (1990) 265:14784–14790.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ungerer M., Böhm M., Elce J.S., Erdmann E., Lohse M.J. Altered expression of β-adrenergic receptor kinase and β1-adrenergic receptors in the failing human heart. Circulation (1993) 87:454–463.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gilbert E.M., Olsen S.L., Renlund D.G., Bristow M.R. Beta-adrenergic receptor regulation and left ventricular function in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. (1993) 71:23C–29C.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Neumann J., Schmitz W., Scholz H., von Meyerinck L., Döring V., Kalmar P. Increase of myocardial Gi-proteins in human heart failure. Lancet (1988) 2:936–937.[ISI][Medline]
- Feldman A.M., Cates A.E., Veazey W.B., et al. Increase of the 40,000-mol wt pertussis toxin substrate (G protein) in the failing human heart. J. Clin. Invest. (1988) 82:189–197.[ISI][Medline]
- Böhm M., Gierschik P., Jakobs K.H., et al. Increase of Gi alpha in human hearts with dilated but not ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation (1990) 82:1249–1265.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Eschenhagen T., Mende U., Nose M., Schmitz W., Scholz H., Haverich A., et al. Increased messenger RNA level of the inhibitory G protein alpha subunit Gi alpha-2 in human end-stage heart failure. Circ. Res. (1992) 70:688–696.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Morris A.J., Malbon C.C. Physiological regulation of G protein-linked signaling. Physiol. Rev. (1999) 79:1373–1430.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Eschenhagen T. G proteins and the heart. Cell. Biol. Int. (1993) 17:723–749.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Böhm M., Eschenhagen T., Gierschik P., et al. Radioimmunochemical quantification of Gi alpha in right and left ventricles from patients with ischaemic and dilated cardiomyopathy and predominant left ventricular failure. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. (1994) 26:133–149.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Mittmann C., Pinkepank G., Stamatelopoulou S., et al. Differential coupling of m-cholinoceptors to Gi/Go proteins in failing human myocardium. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. (2003) 35:1241–1249.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Valenzuela D., Han X., Mende U., Fankhauser C., Mashimo H., Huang P., et al. G alpha(o) is necessary for muscarinic regulation of Ca2+ channels in mouse heart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. (1997) 94:1727–1732.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ye C., Sowell M.O., Vassilev P.M., Milstone D.S., Mortensen R.M. Galpha(i2), Galpha(i3)and Galpha(o) are all required for normal muscarinic inhibition of the cardiac calcium channels in nodal/atrial-like cultured cardiocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. (1999) 31:1771–1781.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Vandecasteele G., Eschenhagen T., Scholz H., Stein B., Verde I., Fischmeister R. Muscarinic and beta-adrenergic regulation of heart rate, force of contraction and calcium current is preserved in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nat. Med. (1999) 5:331–334.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Ji G.J., Fleischmann B.K., Bloch W., et al. Regulation of the L-type Ca2+ channel during cardiomyogenesis: switch from NO to AC-mediated inhibition. FASEB J. (1999) 13:313–324.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Taussig R., Tang W.J., Hepler J.R., Gilman A.G. Distinct pattern of bidirectional regulation of mammalian ACs. J. Biol. Chem. (1994) 269:6093–6100.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bayewitch M.L., Avidor-Reiss T., Levy R., et al. Inhibition of AC isoforms V and VI by various Gbetagamma subunits. FASEB J. (1998) 12:1019–1025.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Taussig R., Gilman A.G. Mammalian membrane-bound ACs. J. Biol. Chem. (1995) 270:1–4.
[Free Full Text] - Rhee S.G., Bae Y.S. Regulation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C isozymes. J. Biol. Chem. (1997) 272:15045–15048.
[Free Full Text] - Tepe N.M., Liggett S.B. Transgenic replacement of type V AC identifies a critical mechanism of beta-adrenergic receptor dysfunction in the G alpha q overexpressing mouse. FEBS Lett. (1999) 458:236–240.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Roth D.M., Bayat H., Drumm J.D., Gao M.H., Swaney J.S., Ander A., et al. AC increases survival in cardiomyopathy. Circulation (2002) 105:1989–1994.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cohn J.N. The sympathetic nervous system in heart failure. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. (1989) 14:57–61.
- Dzau V., Colucci W., Hollenberg N., Williams G. Relation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system to clinical state in congestive heart failure. Circulation (1981) 63:645–656.
[Free Full Text] - Ponicke K., Vogelsang M., Heinroth M., et al. Endothelin receptors in the failing and nonfailing human heart. Circulation (1998) 97:744–751.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Zolk O., Quattek J., Sitzler G., et al. Expression of endothelin-1, endothelin-converting enzyme, and endothelin receptors in chronic heart failure. Circulation (1999) 99:2118–2123.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bayliss J., Norell M., Capena-Anson R., Sutton G., Poole-Wilson P. Untreated heart failure: clinical and neuroendocrine effects of introducing diuretics. Br. Heart J. (1987) 57:17–21.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - de Lemos J.A., McGuire D.K., Drazner M.H. B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular disease. Lancet (2003) 362:316–322.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Francis G.S., Goldsmith S.R., Ziesche S.M., Cohn J.N. Response of plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine to dynamic exercise in patients with congestive heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. (1982) 49:1152–1159.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Francis G.S., Benedict C., Johnstone D.E., et al. Comparison of neuroendocrine activation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. A substudy of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Circulation (1990) 82:1724–1729.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Benedict C.R., Shelton B., Johnstone D.E., et al. Prognostic significance of plasma norepinephrine in patients in asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation (1996) 94:690–697.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Rundqvist B., Elam M., Bergmann-Sverrisdottir Y., Eisenhofer G., Friberg P. Increased cardiac adrenergic drive precedes generalized sympathetic activation in human heart failure. Circulation (1997) 95:169–175.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Böhm M., La R.K., Schwinger R.H., Erdmann E. Evidence for reduction of norepinephrine uptake sites in the failing human heart. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. (1995) 25:146–153.[Abstract]
- Knape J.T., van Zwieten P.A. Positive chronotropic activity of angiotensin II in the pithed normotensive rat is primarily due to activation of cardiac beta 1-adrenoceptors. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. (1988) 338:185–190.[ISI][Medline]
- de Hurtado M.C., Alvarez B.V., Ennis I.L., Cingolani H.E. Stimulation of myocardial Na(+)-independent Cl(–)–HCO(3)(–) exchanger by angiotensin II is mediated by endogenous endothelin. Circ. Res. (2000) 86:622–627.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Harada M., Itoh H., Nakagawa O., et al. Significance of ventricular myocytes and nonmyocytes interaction during cardiocyte hypertrophy: evidence for endothelin-1 as a paracrine hypertrophic factor from cardiac nonmyocytes. Circulation (1997) 96:3737–3744.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Vogelsang M., Broede-Sitz A., Schafer E., Zerkowski H.R., Brodde O.E. Endothelin ETA-receptors couple to inositol phosphate formation and inhibition of adenylate cyclase in human right atrium. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. (1994) 23:344–347.[ISI][Medline]
- Anand-Srivastava M.B., Palaparti A. Angiotensin-II-induced enhanced expression of Gi proteins is attenuated by losartan in A10 vascular smooth muscle cells: role of AT1 receptors. Can J. Physiol. Pharmacol. (2003) 81:150–158.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Rose RA, Lomax AE, Giles WR. Inhibition of L-type calcium current by C-type natriuretic peptide in bullfrog atrial myocytes: an NPR-C mediated effect. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003 (in press).
- Brehm B.R., Heinle H., Risler T., Wolf S.C. Chronically elevated endothelin-1 concentrations modulate the beta-adrenergic receptor system in vitro and in vivo. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. (2000) 36:S157–S159.[ISI][Medline]
- Feldman M.D., Copelas L., Gwathmey J.K., et al. Deficient production of cyclic AMP: pharmacologic evidence of an important cause of contractile dysfunction in patients with endstage heart failure. Circulation (1987) 75:331–339.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Böhm M., Beuckelmann D., Brown L., et al. Reduction of beta-adrenoceptor density and evaluation of positive inotropic responses in isolated, diseased human myocardium. Eur. Heart J. (1988) 9:844–852.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Schmitz W., Scholz H., Erdmann E. Effects of alpha- and beta-adrenergic agonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors and adenosine on isolated human heart muscle preparations. TIPS (1987) 8:447–450.
- Schwinger R.H., Böhm M., Mittmann C., La Rosee K., Erdmann E. Evidence for a sustained effectiveness of sodium-channel activators in failing human myocardium. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. (1991) 23:461–471.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Näbauer M., Brown L., Erdmann E. Positive inotropic effects of the calcium channel activator Bay K 8644 on guinea-pig and human isolated myocardium. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. (1988) 337:85–92.[ISI][Medline]
- Hajjar R.J., Gwathmey J.K. Cross-bridge dynamics in human ventricular myocardium: regulation of contractility in the failing heart. Circulation (1992) 86:1819–1826.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Neumann J., Bartel S., Eschenhagen T., et al. Dissociation of the effects of forskolin and dibutyryl cAMP on force of contraction and phospholamban phosphorylation in human heart failure. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. (1999) 33:157–162.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Harding S.E., Jones S.M., Vescovo G., Del Monte F., Poole-Wilson P.A. Reduced contractile responses to forskolin and a cyclic AMP analogue in myocytes from failing human ventricle. Eur. J. Pharmacol. (1992) 223(13):39–48.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Piacentino V. III, Weber C.R., Chen X., et al. Cellular basis of abnormal calcium transients of failing human ventricular myocytes. Circ. Res. (2003) 92:651–658.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Movsesian M.A., Smith C.J., Krall J., Bristow M.R., Manganiello V.C. Sarcoplasmic reticulum-associated cyclic adenosine 5'-monophosphate phosphodiesterase activity in normal and failing human hearts. J. Clin. Invest. (1991) 88:15–19.[ISI][Medline]
- Bethke T., Eschenhagen T., Klimkiewicz A., et al. Phosphodiesterase inhibition by enoximone in preparations from nonfailing and failing human hearts. Arzneimittelforschung (1992) 42:437–445.[Medline]
- Hershberger R.E., Anderson F.L., Bristow M.R. Vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor in failing human ventricular myocardium exhibits increased affinity and decreased density. Circ. Res. (1989) 65:283–294.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bristow M.R., Hershberger R.E., Port J.D., Minobe W., Rasmussen R. β1- and β2-adrenergic receptor-mediated adenylate cyclase stimulation in nonfailing and failing human ventricular myocardium. Mol. Pharmacol. (1989) 35:295–303.[Abstract]
- Brown L.A., Harding S.E. The effect of pertussis toxin on beta-adrenoceptor responses in isolated cardiac myocytes from noradrenaline-treated guinea-pigs and patients with cardiac failure. Br. J. Pharmacol. (1992) 106:115–122.[ISI][Medline]
- Kompa A.R., Gu X.H., Evans B.A., Summers R.J. Desensitization of cardiac beta-adrenoceptor signaling with heart failure produced by myocardial infarction in the rat. Evidence for the role of Gi but not Gs or phosphorylating proteins. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. (1999) 31:1185–1201.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Post S.R., Hammond H.K., Insel P.A. Beta-adrenergic receptors and receptor signaling in heart failure. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. (1999) 39:343–360.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Brodde O.E. Pathophysiology of the beta-adrenoceptor system in chronic heart failure: consequences for treatment with agonists, partial agonists or antagonists? Eur. Heart J. (1991) 12(Suppl. F):54–62.[ISI][Medline]
- Schwinger R.H., Böhm M., Erdmann E. Evidence against spare or uncoupled beta-adrenoceptors in the human heart. Am. Heart J. (1990) 119:899–904.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Engelhardt S., Böhm M., Erdmann E., Lohse M.J. Analysis of beta-adrenergic receptor mRNA levels in human ventricular biopsy specimens by quantitative polymerase chain reactions: progressive reduction of beta 1-adrenergic receptor mRNA in heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. (1996) 27:146–154.[Abstract]
- Koch W.J., Rockman H.A., Samama P., et al. Cardiac function in mice overexpressing the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase or a beta ARK inhibitor. Science (1995) 268:1350–1353.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Anand-Srivastava M.B. G-proteins and AC signalling in hypertension. Mol. Cell. Biochem. (1996) 157:163–170.[ISI][Medline]
- Böhm M., Gierschik P., Knorr A., Schmidt U., Weismann K., Erdmann E. Cardiac AC, beta-adrenergic receptors, and G proteins in salt-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension (1993) 22:715–727.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Li Y., Anand-Srivastava M.B. Inactivation of enhanced expression of G(i) proteins by pertussis toxin attenuates the development of high blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circ. Res. (2002) 91:247–254.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gong H., Adamson D.L., Ranu H.K., et al. The effect of Gi-protein inactivation on basal, and beta(1)- and beta(2)AR-stimulated contraction of myocytes from transgenic mice overexpressing the beta(2)-adrenoceptor. Br. J. Pharmacol. (2000) 131:594–600.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Communal C., Singh K., Sawyer D.B., Colucci W.S. Opposing effects of beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenergic receptors on cardiac myocyte apoptosis: role of a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein. Circulation (1999) 100:2210–2212.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Zaugg M., Xu W., Lucchinetti E., Shafiq S.A., Jamali N.Z., Siddiqui M.A. Beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes differentially affect apoptosis in adult rat ventricular myocytes. Circulation (2000) 102:344–350.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Chesley A., Lundberg M.S., Asai T., et al. The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor delivers an antiapoptotic signal to cardiac myocytes through G(i)-dependent coupling to phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase. Circ. Res. (2000) 87:1172–1179.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Remondino A., Kwon S.H., Communal C., et al. Beta-adrenergic receptor-stimulated apoptosis in cardiac myocytes is mediated by reactive oxygen species/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-dependent activation of the mitochondrial pathway. Circ. Res. (2003) 92:136–138.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]



