Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2001 49(4):741-750; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(00)00310-2
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, T.G
Right arrow Articles by Camm, A.J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, T.G
Right arrow Articles by Camm, A.J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2001, European Society of Cardiology

Methods of collecting and evaluating non-clinical cardiac electrophysiology data in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an international survey

T.G Hammonda,*, L Carlssonb, A.S Davisc, W.G Lynchd, I MacKenziee, W.S Redfernd, A.T Sullivanf and A.J Cammg

aSafety Assessment UK, AstraZeneca R&D Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG, UK
bCardiovascular Pharmacology, AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, 431 83 Mölndal, Sweden
cAnimal Welfare Group, AstraZeneca R&D Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG, UK
dSafety Pharmacology Department, Safety Assessment UK, AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 5RH, UK
eCovance Laboratories Limited, Otley Road, Harrogate, North Yorks HG3 1PY, UK
fRegulatory Toxicology and International Outsourcing Department, GlaxoWellcome R&D, Park Road, Ware, Hens, SG12 0DP, UK
gDepartment of Cardiological Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-1625-514-810; fax: +44-1625-513-779

Received 25 July 2000; accepted 7 November 2000


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Summary and recommendations
 5 Conclusions
 References
 
Objective: To assess current practice in the pharmaceutical industry for assessing the potential for QT interval prolongation by non-cardiovascular medicinal products. Methods: The survey was based on responses from the Toxicology and (Safety) Pharmacology laboratories (a total of 74 laboratories) of 54 companies based in Europe, Japan/Asia and the USA, received between January and March 1999. Results: All 54 companies conducted preclinical in vivo electrocardiography (EGG) evaluation of new active substances (NASs). Thirty of these companies also conducted in vitro cardiac electrophysiology studies on their compounds. The majority of in vivo work was done in conscious beagle dogs. There was no consistency within the industry in defining the magnitude of change in QT interval that is considered biologically important. Most companies considered a change greater than 10% to be important, although the design of the studies suggested that group sizes used may not give sufficient statistical power to detect this size of change. Bazett's formula was used by 41% of laboratories to correct QT for changes in heart rate, despite the fact that this formula is generally deemed to be unsuitable for use in dogs. For studies in anaesthetised dogs, the majority of laboratories used barbiturate anaesthesia, but researchers should be aware of the effects of this and some other anaesthetic agents on QT interval. As for in vitro cardiac electrophysiology, there was wide diversity in the testing methodologies, particularly with regard to the test species and tissue type. As with QT prolongation, there was no consensus on the degree of action potential prolongation to cause concern. For both in vitro and in vivo testing, the majority of companies tested a minimum of three dose (or concentration) levels in order to ascertain any dose–response relationship. Conclusions: The survey provides a snapshot of the practice in the industry prior to any internationally-agreed consensus on the most effective and efficient approaches to minimising the risk of QT prolongation by new drugs in man. It must be stated that for any given methodology, the ‘majority view’ in the industry is not necessarily best practice.

KEYWORDS EGG; Ion channels; Long QT syndrome; Purkinje fiber; Sudden death


    1 Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Summary and recommendations
 5 Conclusions
 References
 
The occurrence of torsade de pointes with various non-cardiovascular agents such as terfenadine, terodiline and cisapride prompted the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) to issue a ‘Points to Consider’ document in 1997 [1]. There has since been much debate within the pharmaceutical industry as to the most predictive in vitro and in vivo techniques to detect such activity, and indeed as to whether the in vitro tests are worthwhile.

This paper contains the results of a survey conducted in the pharmaceutical industry between January and March 1999. The aim of the survey was to assess current approaches, practices and methodologies within the phannaceutical industry relating to the detection of delayed ventricular repolarization by all new active substances (NASs), prior to human exposure. The survey was not designed to ask opinions on the merits of the various CPMP-recommended tests. The survey involved two questionnaires, on cardiac electrophysiology techniques in vivo and in vitro, respectively.

Where we have made recommendations, they are based on our own experience of the methodology and knowledge of the literature.


    2 Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Summary and recommendations
 5 Conclusions
 References
 
The ‘in vivo’ and ‘in vitro’ questionnaires comprised 28 and 38 primary questions, respectively. Copies of the original questionnaires are available on request to the corresponding author. In the tables, ‘Number’ refers to ‘Number of laboratories’. Where percentages are given, these have been rounded-off to the nearest whole number.


    3 Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Summary and recommendations
 5 Conclusions
 References
 
A total of 54 companies responded, ranging from small private companies to large multinationals. Although this might give undue influence to smaller companies (with a smaller number of annual submissions to regulatory authorities), on the other hand the larger companies generally returned responses from more than one site. Of the global top 25 pharmaceutical companies worldwide in terms of Pharma sales in 1998 [2], all companies ranked in the top five responded, and a total of 16 of the top 25 responded.

3.1 In vivo electrocardiogram (ECG) data
Where clearly indicated on the completed questionnaires, the entries were separated into (Safety) Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratories. Therefore, from a total of 54 companies, there were responses from 74 laboratories. Nearly half of the laboratories (35) were European-based although adequate representation from Japan (26) and the USA (13) give confidence that the responses reflect practices worldwide.

3.1.1 Choice of species and model
All companies collected in vivo ECG data as part of the preclinical evaluation of NASs. The beagle dog was the main species used (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Species used in in vivo studiesa

 
It should be noted that 26% of laboratories collected ECG data from the rat, which is not generally considered to be a suitable species to detect alteration of the QT interval as a consequence of blocking effect on IKr (the rapid component of the delayed rectifying potassium current) — see Summary and recommendations. However, only one laboratory in the survey used the rat exclusively for deriving ECG data, but another laboratory within the same company was using non-rodents. The majority of laboratories evaluated ECGs from conscious dogs or monkeys. Regardless of species, telemetry techniques were used by 28 out of 74 laboratories (38%) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 General methods used in in vivo studies

 
Of those companies using anaesthetised preparations, the majority (51%) used intravenous barbiturate as the anaesthetic of choice. Most of the anaesthetics recorded in the survey have either overt or subtle effects upon cardiovascular function, and many also increase QT interval (see Summary and recommendations). According to the survey returns, 11 laboratories relied entirely on anaesthetised preparations for evaluation of effects of NASs on the ECG.

3.1.2 Experimental design
The majority of laboratories (72%) tested three or more dose levels. Surprisingly, several laboratories (17%) used only one or two dose groups, although no information to justify this (such as vaccine evaluation) was given.

The group sizes used predominantly ranged between three and six with very few using group sizes below three (Table 3). Of the 69 laboratories that used three or more animals per dose group, 44 (64%) applied statistical analysis to the QT interval data. However, in one laboratory, statistics on QT interval (see later in report) were apparently applied to a group size of two!


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Group sizes used in in vivo studies

 
The majority of laboratories (70%) included a negative control group of similar size to the test groups. The reason for the lack of controls in the remainder is not apparent but may be due to experimental design with animals acting as their own control.

Of those laboratories that conducted multiple dose studies, the majority (86%) recorded ECGs both pre- and post-dose. Those who did not (recording either pre- or post-dose only) all used concomitant negative controls. Post-dose recordings were usually timed to relate to toxicokinetic/pharmacokinetic profiles of the NAS (Figs. 1 and 2Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Time points for ECG recording.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Availability of toxicokinetic data prior to study.

 
3.1.3 Techniques
There was wide variability between laboratories in the positioning of animals for EGG recording (Table 4). Although this may cause difficulty in interpretation of waveform morphology [3], it is unlikely to have major consequences for measurement of EGG intervals. The importance of heart rate was probably not being addressed adequately, with 32% of companies taking no measures to ensure that heart rate was recorded at ‘resting’ heart rate (Fig. 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Positioning of animals for ECG recordings

 

Figure 3
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Method of achieving ‘resting’ heart rate.

 
Eighteen laboratories recorded EGG at paper speeds of 25 mm/s or less although, of these, only 7 relied on manual measurement and could be expected to have had difficulty with accuracy of measurement. Similarly, 8 laboratories appeared to use a 1 mm/mV amplitude calibration which could be expected to cause difficulty with assessment of waveform, especially T-wave.

The majority of laboratories (73%) did not use chest leads. Most laboratories recorded six limb leads, presumably to assess morphology (Table 5). Twenty-nine laboratories used either lead II alone or in combination with leads I and III. However, the majority of laboratories (78%) measured EGG intervals from lead II only (Table 6).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5 ECG limb leads recorded

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6 Derivation of QT interval

 
Automated EGG data capture and analysis was widely used (Fig. 4). The majority of these laboratories had validated their data acquisition systems, reflecting a similar proportion conducting their studies in a ‘Good Laboratory Practice’ (GLP) environment (Fig. 5).


Figure 4
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Method of measurement of ECG parameters.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 Validation of recording systems.

 
Despite the fact that 69% of laboratories used validated methods (manual or automatic), only 53% had acceptance/rejection criteria based on trace quality. The methodology used to record ECG data has been changed significantly in the last 5–10 years in 39 laboratories (i.e. 52%). This included 17 of the 25 laboratories that have experienced regulatory issues with compounds that prolong QT interval.

3.1.4 Data analysis
The majority of laboratories statistically analysed data for heart rate, PR/PQ interval, QRS duration and QT interval. Most did not analyse amplitudes. It should be noted that, while 92% of laboratories measured QT interval, 28% did not statistically analyse the data (Table 7). Most laboratories (66%) did not assess the U-wave, and rhythm was not assessed by 43% of laboratories. Very few laboratories (5 in all) measured QT interval dispersion.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 7 Analysis of ECG variables

 
The use of formulae to correct QT for changes in heart rate (Fig. 6) was widespread (63% of laboratories), and frequently included statistical analysis of the derived data.


Figure 6
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 Correction of QT for heart rate.

 
3.1.5 Data interpretation
There were 4 types of analysis used by laboratories to assess drug-induced changes in QT (Table 8). However, of possible concern is that 26% of laboratories did not appear to have predetermined criteria to assess changes in QT interval. For those that have established criteria variability in the method of assessment exist (Table 9). Thirteen laboratories considered a 10% increase in QT interval to be significant (i.e. biologically significant) with a wide range of ‘thresholds for concern’ amongst the remaining laboratories.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 8 Approaches to assessing drug-induced changes in OT

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 9 Magnitude of change in OT interval considered to be significant

 
3.2 In vitro cardiac electrophysiological data
In contrast to the in vivo section of the survey, none of the companies in the survey performed in vitro cardiac electrophysiology in more than one in-house facility, so the term ‘company’ rather than ‘laboratory’ is used in this section. Of the 54 companies polled, 30 (56%) conducted in vitro cardiac electrophysiology studies, and a further 5 (9%) planned to do so (Fig. 7).


Figure 7
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7 Companies conducting in vitro cardiac electro-physiology studies on non-cardiovascular compounds (% of 54 companies).

 
The data presented here are based on replies from the 30 companies that did carry out such studies at the time of the survey. Of these 30 companies, 20 had the capability to perform the studies in-house. Most of the 30 companies were located in Europe (53%), with fewer in Japan/Asia and the USA (30% and 17%, respectively). The geographical distribution of companies that had in-house capability to carry out in vitro cardiac electrophysiology showed approximately 20% to be located in the USA, with 40% each in Japan/Asia and Europe. The majority (67%) of the 30 companies conducted these in vitro investigations prior to first administration to man.

3.2.1 Species and tissues
There was a broad diversity between companies in the choice of species and tissues used for these studies. The most commonly used tissues were Purkinje fibre and papillary muscle. The distribution of tissues and species is shown in Fig. 8. A small number of companies reported using other species (one each for pig, human, monkey) and other tissues [ventricular muscle (1), sino-atrial node (1), right ventricular myocardium (1), perfused or isolated heart (3) and myocytes (3)]. Only one group used neonatal animals (pigs); the remainder used adults. Only one company used female animals only, all others used males only or both sexes. In many instances, especially for the larger species, animals were killed with an overdose of anaesthetic, usually barbiturate. This may be a concern because it has been shown that anaesthetics can affect myocardial ion channels involved in action potential duration [4–6] and it is not clear whether, and how quickiy, the effects of an anaesthetic administered to an animal will diminish when tissues are removed for in vitro studies.


Figure 8
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8 Most commonly-used species and tissues.

 
3.2.2 Experimental design
There was no consensus on criteria for selection of a concentration range for the test compound (Fig. 9). Thirty-seven per cent of companies tested multiples of a plasma concentration (therapeutic or pharmacologically effective), whereas in 30% of companies a fixed range of concentrations was used, irrespective of the potency of the compound. Most companies tested between three and six concentrations of test compound, in three to six preparations per compound (Figs. 10 and 11Go).


Figure 9
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9 Test concentration selection criteria.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10 Number of concentrations tested.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11 Number of preparations per study.

 
The percentage of companies that used negative and positive controls in their studies is shown in Fig. 12. It is noteworthy that while 57% of respondents included negative controls, 37% did not. It is of less concern that 30% did not run a positive control group. Where control groups (positive or negative) are used, they generally consist of three to six preparations.


Figure 12
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12 Inclusion of negative and positive controls.

 
Regarding timing of electrophysiology recordings, 60% of companies used pre-selected or specified times, while the remainder used variable time points, or did not answer this question. In 60% of companies, the identity of key metabolites was not known at the time of initial studies, so where they were tested at all (in 53% of companies) this was done at a later time.

Most companies (63%) acquired their action potential recordings by continuous impalement of the tissue, but 20% used serial sampling (i.e. successive impalement of several cells during the experiment). Slightly over half the companies (57%) used a ‘normal’ stimulation frequency (in this context, ‘normal’ is taken to be 1 Hz) while 27% used low and/or high frequencies in addition. Again, 57% used more than one frequency of stimulation in their study design; 65% allowed an adjustment period of 1 to 5 min following any change in stimulation frequency, whereas others used 6 to 10 min (12%), or greater than 10 min (6%). The majority of companies (70%) used either Tyrodes, Krebs or Krebs–Henseleit solutions in their studies, and the concentrations of potassium, magnesium, calcium and glucose used reflected this. Most companies used a temperature over 35°C, but some (13%) used a temperature below 35°C.

3.2.3 Data analysis and interpretation
Most of the key action potential parameters were measured and/or analysed by the majority of companies, including, importantly, resting membrane potential, maximum upstroke velocity, amplitude and action potential duration at 90% repolarisation (APD90). Probably the single most important parameter to be measured in order to assess activity at the IKr channel is APD90. The range of control values obtained for this parameter is shown in Table 10.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 10 Control APD90 ranges

 
However, 13% of companies did not appear to measure APD90, and there were differences in what degree of change in APD90 companies thought was a ‘cause for concern’ (Fig. 13). This varied from <10% (by 10% of companies), 10–20% (by 47% of companies) to <20% (by 10% of companies). It may also be of some concern that, in 17% of companies, data were not subject to peer review.


Figure 13
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 13 % increase in APD90 to raise concern.

 
Finally, nearly half of the companies stated that they had changed the methods that they used for in vitro electrophysiology studies over the past 5 to 10 years, but it did not seem that this was related to any particular experience with the regulatory authorities.


    4 Summary and recommendations
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Summary and recommendations
 5 Conclusions
 References
 
For both in vitro and in vivo testing, the majority of companies tested a minimum of three dose (or concentration) levels in order to ascertain any dose-response relationship. We consider this to be appropriate.

4.1 In vivo techniques
4.1.1 Choice of species
Generally, the species used were appropriate to detect QT change of relevance to man, with beagle dogs being the most popular. Other species were used less frequently than the dog, but with the exception of the rat, there is no particular reason why other species such as pig/minipig, rabbit or guinea-pig would not be as predictive of effects on ventricular repolarisation in man. However, the rat should not be used to assess QT interval changes. Whereas the rat is of some value in cardiovascular assessments, this species will probably not be susceptible to action potential lengthening and QT prolongation as a consequence of blockade of the rapid component of the delayed rectifying potassium current (IKr). Although the consensus view is that ventricular tissue from this species does express this ion channel protein [7,8], a dominant transient outward current (Ito) will rapidly restore membrane potential to negative voltages, thus reducing the time for IKr activation. As a consequence, the adult rat lacks a prominent action potential plateau and therefore agents blocking IKr will not prolong action potential duration in this species [7,9,10]. In short, the current patterns during repolarization are quite different in the rat myocardium compared with humans and other mammalian species, such as guinea-pig [11,12].

4.1.2 Choice of anaesthetic (for EGG measurements in anaesthetised preparations)
Anaesthetised preparations are an acceptable adjunct to the conscious studies, permitting a more thorough evaluation of cardiovascular effects. Choice of anaesthetic is important, as several agents in common use have direct effects on QT interval or the cardiovascular system (Table 11).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 11 Effects of anaesthetics on OT interval

 
It is, therefore, worth noting that the presence of anaesthetic during cardiovascular evaluations may alter the sensitivity of the model to detect effects on ventricular repolarisation and consequently QT duration. Consideration should be given to the effects of the anaesthetic agent used on the cardiovascular system and on cardiac ion channels, particularly when anaesthetised preparations are to be the only model for ECG assessment.

4.1.3 EGG leads
The number of leads used to collect ECG data varied between laboratories. We propose that only one lead (generally lead II) is necessary for measuring QT interval, but that the recording of three leads will enable choice of the clearest waveform for interval measurements, and will permit assessment of morphology. Chest leads are not required for ECG interval analysis. Few laboratories assessed U-wave, probably reflecting its rare occurrence in dogs. The large majority of laboratories in the survey did not measure QT interval dispersion. There is little published data to support the value of QT dispersion in animals presently.

4.1.4 Quality of data
Methodology used to evaluate ECG in animals is evolving. Some of the improvements appear to be in response to regulatory issues and recent guidelines. Generally, the quality of data generated is considered to be adequate to permit evaluation of drug-induced changes in QT interval. Wide variability existed in the positioning of dogs for EGG recording, although we do not consider this to be important for measuring ECG intervals per se.

4.1.5 Correction of QT interval for changes in heart rate
Whereas 41% of laboratories used Bazett's formula to correct QT for changes in heart rate, in the literature this formula is generally deemed to be unsuitable for use in dogs. Use of correction formulae was not consistent and in some instances inappropriate. In those cases where a statistically significant change in heart rate is seen, QT should be corrected and the method of correction must be justified. Bazett's formula is unlikely to be suitable for dogs, and other methods of correction have been proposed [13–15]. Alternatively, a regression approach may be applied, based on in-house data of QT-heart rate relationships in the individual beagles under drug-free conditions. Measures should be taken to ensure that, as far as possible, recordings are taken at ‘resting’ heart rates. This will reduce the need for correction formulae, reduce the variance of the data, and ensure that QT prolongation is not masked at high heart rates by the effects of reverse use-dependence.

4.1.6 Study design/power
ECG recording/analysis was usually conducted at intervals that reflected pharmacokinetic/toxicokinetic profiles. The study designs are generally acceptable with respect to numbers of dose groups, although a minimum of three dose levels is required to detect dose-related changes. Investigators need to perform statistical power calculations based on in-house data, in order to build-in sufficient n numbers to detect the magnitude of changes in QT interval that they consider to be ‘biologically significant’. Based on preliminary estimates of sample sizes, using a standard formula for power calculations [16] we believe that group sizes of n = 4 may be inadequate to detect changes in QT interval of 10% in conscious dogs, but may detect changes of ~20% (for control QT=200 ms; control S.D.=19 ms; P<0.05, 2-tailed, unpaired test; 80% power). This can be improved upon if QT is corrected using the formula of Van de Water et al. (1989), where group sizes of five are sufficient to detect changes in QTc of 10% (control QTc=236 ms; control S.D.=13 ms; P<0.05, 2-tailed, unpaired test; 80% power). However, the degree of change in QT (or QTc) considered to be ‘biologically significant’ was not universally consistent. Not all laboratories used statistical analysis of their QT data. We consider a lack of statistical analysis to be undesirable.

4.2 In vitro techniques
Only 30 companies investigated their compounds using in vitro cardiac electrophysiology tests. There was wide diversity in the testing methodologies, particularly with regard to the test species and tissue type. The survey was initiated in response to the CPMP Points to Consider [1] which did not include assessment of activity in cloned human ion channels. It is recognised that this methodology is becoming increasingly important.

4.2.1 Choice of species
As with the in vivo testing, there is no compelling reason to use one species rather than another on the basis of ion channel function, with the exception of the rat, which is of limited value for predicting electrophysiological effects on the human myocardium, and was not in any case used for in vitro studies by any of the companies in the survey.

4.2.2 Tissue preparation
The use of in vitro techniques may require that the experimental tissue be removed under terminal anaesthesia, often using a high dose of barbiturate. This is especially true in the case of larger species such as the dog, which cannot reasonably be killed by any other method. It is not established whether, or how rapidly, the effects of an anaesthetic administered to the intact animal will wear off once tissue has been removed into an organ bath and bathed with a physiological salt solution. Therefore, there would have to be some degree of caution implicit in the use of tissue harvested from anaesthetised animals (and thus from dogs).

4.2.3 Action potential characteristics
We recommend that APD90 is the most appropriate marker of action potential duration. However, careful evaluation of drug effects on Vmax and upstroke amplitude is as important as assessment of APD. As with QT prolongation, there was no consensus on the degree of action potential prolongation to cause concern.

4.2.4 Quality of data
Seventeen percent of companies did not subject their data to peer review; this may give cause for concern regarding the quality of the data from the studies. Sixty percent of companies did not carry out the studies to GLP; this could be an issue if the information is used to support administration of the substance to humans. Thirty-three percent did not have acceptance criteria (e.g. action potential morphology/characteristics) for whether they would accept data from a tissue preparation. Sixty-three percent did not correct for electrode drift over the time course of the experiment. In four companies, experiments were carried out at a temperature of less than 35°C, which will markedly influence ion channel biophysics and kinetics. Up to 13% of companies may not have been measuring or analysing APD90; 53% did not output their action potential waveforms to a chart recorder; this would make proper assessment for early after-depolarisations difficult. Use of continuous impalements rather than serial sampling techniques to improve data accuracy and quality is recommended.

4.2.5 Rate dependence
While a majority of those responding carried out some testing at a range of frequencies, it is doubtful that there is significant added value in doing this during routine screening. However, in the event of a drug effect at (say) 1 Hz, it would then be worthwhile exploring rate-dependence.

4.2.6 Time-matched controls
Thirty-seven percent of companies did not routinely include a negative (time-matched) control group. Use of appropriate time-matched negative (i.e. vehicle– perfused) control preparations is recommended. Routine inclusion of a positive control (i.e. reference substance) would be desirable.


    5 Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Summary and recommendations
 5 Conclusions
 References
 
The survey provides a snapshot of the practice in the pharmaceutical industry prior to any internationally-agreed consensus on the most effective and efficient approaches to minimising the risk of QT prolongation by new drugs in man. The survey has revealed a wide spectrum of approaches to addressing this issue in the pharmaceutical industry, and there is clearly a need for a degree of consensus on ‘best practice’ in terms of methodology [27,28]. It must be stated, however, that for any given methodology, the ‘majority view’ in the industry is not necessarily best practice.

Time for primary review 22 days.


    Acknowledgements
 
We would like to thank each of the 74 laboratories (from 54 companies world-wide) who completed questionnaires.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Summary and recommendations
 5 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) Points to Consider: The assessment of the potential for QT interval prolongation by non-cardiovascular medicinal products. CPMP/986/96, 1997.
  2. SCRIP No. 2426/27 April 7th/9th 1999, p. 17.
  3. Detweiler D.K. Cardiac Toxicology. Balasz T, ed. (1982) Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. 33–82.
  4. Gibbons S.J, Nunez-Hernandez R, Maze G, Harrison N.L. Inhibition of a fast inwardly rectifying potassium conductance by barbiturates. Anesth Analg (1996) 82:1242–1246.[Abstract]
  5. Martynyuk A.E, Morey T.E, Raatikainen M.J, Seubert C.N, Dennis D.M. Ionic mechanisms mediating the differential effects of methohexital and thiopental on action potential duration in guinea pig and rabbit isolated ventricular myocytes. Anesthesiology (1999) 90:156–164.[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Shimizu W, McMahon B, Antzelevitch C. Sodium pentobarbital reduces transmural dispersion of repolarization and prevents Torsades de Pointes in models of acquired and congenital long QT syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (1999) 10:154–164.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Abrahamsson C, Palmer M, Ljung B, Duter G, Baarnhielm C, Carlsson L, Danielsson B. Induction of rhythm abnormalities in the fetal rat heart. A tentative mechanism for the embryotoxic effect of the class III antiarrhythmic agent almokalant. Cardiovasc Res (1994) 28:337–344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wymore R.S, Gintant G.A, Wymore R.T, Dixon J.E, McKinnon D, Cohen I.S. Tissue and species distribution of mRNA for the IKr-like K+ channel, erg. Circ Res (1997) 80:261–268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Tande P.M, Bjornstad H, Yang T, Refsum H. Rate-dependent Class III antiarrhythmic action, negative chronotropy, and positive inotropy of a novel IK blocking drug, UK68,798: potent in guinea pig but no effect in rat myocardium. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol (1990) 16:401–410.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Dukes I.D, Cleemann L, Morad M. Tedisamil blocks the transient and delayed rectifier K+ currents in mammalian cardiac and glial cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (1990) 254:560–569.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Langer G.A. Interspecies variation in myocardial physiology: the anomalous rat. Env Health Perspect (1978) 26:175–179.[CrossRef]
  12. Mitchell M.R, Powell T, Terrar D.A, Twist V.W. Electrical activity and contractions in cells isolated from rat and guinea-pig ventricular muscle: a comparative study. J Physiol (1987) 391:527–544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Van de Water A, Verheyen J, Xhonneux R. Reneman, R.S. (1989) An improved method to correct the QT interval of the electrocardiogram for changes in heart rate. J Pharmacol Meth (1989) 22:207–217.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Oguchi Y, Hamlin R.L. Duration of QT interval in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res (1993) 54:2145–2149.[Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Matsunaga T, Mitsui T, Harada T, Inokuma M, Murano H, Shibutani Y. QT corrected for heart rate and relation between QT and RR intervals in beagle dogs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods (1997) 38:201–209.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Daly L.E, Bourke G.J, McGilvray J. Interpretation and Uses of Medical Statisitics. (1991) 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  17. Marshall B.E, Longnecker D.E. Goodman and Gilman's ‘The pharmacological basis of therapeutics’. Goodman Gilman A, Rall T.W, Nies A.S, Taylor P, eds. (1990) 8th ed. New York: Pergamon Press. 285–310.
  18. Keegan R.D, Greene S.A. Cardiovascular effects of a continuous two-hour propofol infusion in dogs. Comparison with isoflurane anesthesia. Vet Surg (1993) 22:537–543.[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Deryck Y.L, Brimouille S, Maggiorini M, de Canniere D, Naeije R. Systemic vascular effects of isoflurane versus propofol anaesthesia in dogs. Anaesth Analg (1996) 83:958–964.[Abstract]
  20. Reinert H. Urethane hyperglycaemia and hypothalamic activation. Nature 1964;204:889–891.
  21. Dean H.G, Rylett P.A. Plasma adrenaline concentration in rats: influence of anaesthetics and heart rate response to pronethalol. J Pharm Pharmacol (1975) 27:70–71.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Riley D.C, Schmeling W.T, al-Wathiqui J.P, Warltier D.C. Prolongation of the QT interval by volatile anesthetics in chronically instrumented dogs. Anesth Analg (1988) 67:741–749.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hunt G.B, Ross D.L. Comparison of effects of three anesthetic agents on induction of ventricular tachycardia in a canine model of myocardial infarction. Circulation (1988) 78:221–226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gonder J.C, Gard E.A, Lott N.E. Electrocardiograms of nine species of nonhuman primates sedated with ketamine. Am J Vet Res (1980) 41:972–975.[Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Schwartz J.B, Herre J.M. The electrophysiological effects of alpha-chloralose anesthesia in the intact dog: (1) alone and (2) in combination with verapamil. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol (1989) 12:283–293.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Michaloudis D.G, Kanakoudis F.S, Petrou A.M, Konstantinou A.S, Pollard B.J. The effects of midazolam or propofol followed by suxamethonium on the QT interval in humans. Eur J Anaesthesiol (1996) 13:364–368.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Cavero I, Mestre M, Guillon J.-M, Heuillet E, Roach A. Preclinical in vitro cardiac electrophysiology: a method of predicting arrhythmogenic potential of antihistamines in humans? Drug Safety (2000) 21(Suppl. 1):19–31. and Panel Discussion pp. 81–87.[Web of Science]
  28. Haverkamp W, Breithardt G, Camm A.J, Janse M.J, Rosen M.R, Antzelevitch C, Escande D, Franz M, Malik M, Moss A, Shah R. The potential for QT prolongation and proarrhythmia by non-antiarrhythmic drugs: clinical and regulatory implications. Cardiovasc Res (2000) 47:219–233. published simultaneously in Eur Heart J 2000;21:1216–1231.[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
W.S. Redfern, L. Carlsson, A.S. Davis, W.G. Lynch, I. MacKenzie, S. Palethorpe, P.K.S. Siegl, I. Strang, A.T. Sullivan, R. Wallis, et al.
Relationships between preclinical cardiac electrophysiology, clinical QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2003; 58(1): 32 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
M. R. Gralinski
The Dog's Role in the Preclinical Assessment of QT Interval Prolongation
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2003; 31(1_suppl): 11 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
L. Carlsson
Drug-induced torsade de pointes: the perspectives of industry
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2001; 3(suppl_K): K114 - K120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, T.G
Right arrow Articles by Camm, A.J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, T.G
Right arrow Articles by Camm, A.J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?