Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2000 47(3):457-464; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(00)00054-7
© 2000 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laight, D.W.
Right arrow Articles by Änggård, E.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laight, D.W.
Right arrow Articles by Änggård, E.E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2000, European Society of Cardiology

Antioxidants, diabetes and endothelial dysfunction

D.W. Laight*, M.J. Carrier and E.E. Änggård

The William Harvey Research Institute, St. Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Charterhouse Square, London EC1 6BQ, UK

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-171-982-6037; fax: +44-171-982-6016 d.w.laight{at}mds.qmw.ac.uk

Received 3 January 2000; accepted 8 February 2000


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Endothelial dysfunction,...
 3 Endothelial dysfunction and...
 4 Endothelium and oxidant...
 5 Antioxidants and diabetes
 6 Conclusions
 References
 
While a damaged endothelium is recognised to be a key accessory to diabetic macroangiopathy, awareness is developing that impairments concerning endothelium- and nitric oxide (NO)-dependent microvascular function, may contribute to several other corollaries of diabetes, such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and in vivo insulin resistance. There are now several reports describing elevations in specific oxidant stress markers in both insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) and diabetes, together with determinations of reduced total antioxidant defence and depletions in individual antioxidants. Such a pro-oxidant environment in diabetes may disrupt endothelial function through the inactivation of NO, resulting in the attenuation of a fundamental anti-atherogenic and euglycaemic vascular influence. Indeed, experimental and clinical data suggest that the supplementation of insulin resistant or diabetic states with antioxidants such as vitamin E, normalises oxidant stress and improves both endothelium-dependent vasodilation and insulin sensitivity. However, the promising potential efficacy of antioxidant therapy in cardiovascular disease and diabetes, in either a primary or secondary preventative role, awaits definitive clinical demonstration.

KEYWORDS Blood flow; Diabetes; Endothelial function; Free radicals; Nitric oxide


    1 Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Endothelial dysfunction,...
 3 Endothelial dysfunction and...
 4 Endothelium and oxidant...
 5 Antioxidants and diabetes
 6 Conclusions
 References
 
Insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) or metabolic syndrome X [1,2], is characterised by a group of metabolic and haemostatic abnormalities, most of which represent independent risk factors for the development of type II diabetes (see Fig. 1). These include impaired glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinaemia, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, a pro-thrombotic/hypo-fibrinolytic state, oxidant stress and endothelial dysfunction [1–3]. This cluster also generates an increased risk of macroangiopathy in both diabetes and the prediabetic state represented by IRS, resulting principally from atherosclerotic and thrombotic pathologies [4]. Such macroangiopathy is often present at the diagnosis of type II diabetes [5] and the associated coronary artery, cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular disease are leading causes of diabetic morbidity and mortality.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Hypothetical scheme linking oxidant stress, endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance in the setting of type II diabetes.

 
Given the central pathogenic role of the dysfunctional endothelium in the atherosclerosis of large and medium-sized arteries [6,7], it is increasingly clear that endothelial cells are the ultimate target of pro-atherogenic mediators in IRS and diabetes such as oxidant stress [7–9]. Furthermore, a more disseminated endothelial dysfunction possibly mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS), for example in resistance and microvascular beds, may even underlie the parallel development of some of the principal facets of IRS such as hypertension, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia and altered haemostasis [10]. This notion is lent credence by findings that in common with atherosclerosis, endotheliopathy is an early abnormality and precedes the development of type II diabetes [11].

The pathological role of the endothelium as both a target and mediator of diabetic macroangiopathy, has been the subject of a recent review by us [12]. The present review examines how endothelial dysfunction associated with oxidant stress, may help generate a number of risk factors for diabetic macroangiopathy, including vascular and metabolic insulin resistance, before considering evidence of an altered antioxidant status in diabetes and the potential of antioxidant therapy.


    2 Endothelial dysfunction, vascular insensitivity to insulin and hypertension
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Endothelial dysfunction,...
 3 Endothelial dysfunction and...
 4 Endothelium and oxidant...
 5 Antioxidants and diabetes
 6 Conclusions
 References
 
2.1 Vasodilator activity of insulin
Insulin per se elicits nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilation in human skeletal muscle [13,14], possibly by enhancing agonist-stimulated endothelial vasodilator function [15,16]. This vasodilator action of insulin can be shown to be blunted in insulin resistant states such as obesity, hypertension and type II diabetes [17–19]. Moreover, the recent report by Tack et al. [20] that impaired insulin-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilation in obesity may be independent of frank endothelial vasodilator dysfunction, raises the fascinating possibility of a discrete vascular insensitivity to insulin or ‘vascular insulin resistance’ at the level of the endothelium [21]. Such a defect in the putative tonic modulation of endothelial vasodilator function in resistance vessels by insulin, has already been suggested to contribute to hypertension in a genetic model of insulin resistance, the obese Zucker rat [22].

Studies in insulin resistant, hypertensive patients and spontaneously hypertensive rats by Lembo et al. [23] support a causative or permissive role of such ‘vascular insulin resistance’ in the development of essential hypertension. However, the role of this phenomenon in the maintenance of hypertension is less clear since, while the endothelial NO pathway is thought to be defective in this condition [15,24], insulin may still be able to potentiate endothelium-dependent vasodilation by what appears to be a compensatory, hyperpolarising mechanism in established essential hypertension [15]. Of course, endothelium-derived endothelin-1 and angiotensin II, two powerful vasoconstrictor and pro-mitogenic agents, are also clearly implicated in the progression of endothelial dysfunction and hypertension in diabetes [25–30].


    3 Endothelial dysfunction and in vivo insulin resistance
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Endothelial dysfunction,...
 3 Endothelial dysfunction and...
 4 Endothelium and oxidant...
 5 Antioxidants and diabetes
 6 Conclusions
 References
 
3.1 Blood flow and insulin-mediated glucose disposal
Endothelial vasodilator dysfunction at the level of metabolically important arterioles such as those of skeletal muscle, may not only precede but also play a role in the development of IRS [10,31]. This is because a deficit in endothelium-dependent vasodilation described in insulin resistant states including type II diabetes [19,32–34], may impair the postprandial increase in blood flow in insulin-sensitive tissues such as skeletal muscle, now considered to be a significant determinant of glucose disposal, at least in insulin-sensitive individuals [17,35–37]. This could explain the relationship between insulin sensitivity and NO-mediated, endothelial vasodilator function reported in normal subjects [37–39], although such a link is not a universal finding [40]. Furthermore, as mentioned above, insulin is itself an endothelium-dependent vasodilator and this vascular effect in insulin-sensitive tissue is diminished in insulin resistant states [17–19]. Indeed, impaired insulin-stimulated NO-mediated vasodilation in skeletal muscle has been accorded a major role in the pathogenesis of the in vivo insulin resistance associated with type I diabetes [41]. Furthermore, a defective insulin-mediated, endothelium-dependent regulation of blood flow in adipose tissue has itself been suggested to pose a significant cardiovascular risk, since this may contribute to postprandial hyperlipidaemia [42].

3.2 Role of endothelial transcytosis of insulin
Another aspect of endothelial dysfunction to consider in insulin resistant individuals is the delay in the endothelial transport of insulin to the interstitial space [35,43] which, although probably insufficient to account for poor insulin action under steady-state conditions [44], may nonetheless impose a rate-limiting step in glucose disposal in response to rapidly changing blood-borne insulin levels [45].

3.3 Significance of endothelial dysfunction to in vivo insulin resistance
Defects in both metabolically relevant endothelial vasoactive and transport function coupled with a reported reduction in skeletal muscle capillarisation in insulin resistant individuals [46], may all contribute to in vivo insulin resistance in man [47] and thus conceivably promote hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia and generate an enhanced cardiovascular risk. However, despite the identification of defects in endothelium-dependent vasodilation and the adverse implications for glycaemic control in insulin resistant states, reports in type II diabetic patients so far indicate that simply normalising skeletal muscle blood flow does not overcome established in vivo insulin resistance [39,48,49]. While this may not seem surprising in view of the fact that insulin resistance predominantly concerns a cellular defect in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake [50], it is important to distinguish between nutritive and non-nutritive microvascular flow in such studies; since only a rise in the former, which indeed may occur independently of a change in total blood flow, can be expected to enhance glucose and insulin delivery and therefore facilitate glucose disposal in insulin-sensitive tissue such as skeletal muscle [35].


    4 Endothelium and oxidant stress
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Endothelial dysfunction,...
 3 Endothelial dysfunction and...
 4 Endothelium and oxidant...
 5 Antioxidants and diabetes
 6 Conclusions
 References
 
4.1 ROS and insulin action
Oxidant stress is associated with type II diabetes [51,52]and has recently been identified in our laboratory in the insulin resistant, obese Zucker rat [53]. While the origin(s) of this oxidant stress remains to be fully defined, it is clear that the generation of ROS including superoxide anion may be elevated in type II diabetes and even during impaired glucose tolerance [54], due in part to glucose auto-oxidation and non-enzymatic protein glycation [55]. ROS generation has also been associated with the interaction of advanced glycation endproducts (AGE) with specific receptors (RAGE), present on endothelium [56]. In addition, hyperglycaemia has been demonstrated to generate superoxide anion via the stimulation of endothelial cyclo-oxygenase activity in vitro [57]. Other potential endothelial sources of ROS include the activity of NADPH oxidase and ‘uncoupled’ NO synthase activity [58,59].

Oxidant stress contributes to insulin resistance in man [60] and we have made a similar observation in the obese Zucker rat, based on the ability of a lipophilic antioxidant, vitamin E, to improve insulin action in vivo while reducing elevated plasma levels of a lipid peroxidation marker [61]. Moreover, we have very recently shown that a pro-oxidant challenge in this insulin resistant animal in vivo, provokes a further deterioration in insulin action leading to a type II diabetic state [62]. This is the first demonstration of such a vulnerability to an environmental pro-oxidative insult in established insulin resistance.

Although the cellular source(s) of ROS is still unknown in such studies on the relationship between oxidant stress and insulin resistance, it is clear that endothelium-derived ROS potentially make a key contribution to poor insulin action at metabolically relevant sites (see above). Indeed, part of this contribution could concern a ROS-mediated reduction in trans-endothelial insulin transport [63]. Furthermore, the rapid inactivation of the endothelium-derived nitrovasodilator NO by vascular superoxide anion [64–66], may account for the impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation observed in type II diabetic patients [67–69] and therefore contribute to a haemodynamic component of in vivo insulin resistance as well as more directly promoting atherogenesis [12]. It is interesting to note in this regard that our novel pro-oxidant model of type II diabetes in the obese Zucker rat [62], is also associated with evidence of a lesion in the NO signalling pathway in vivo (unpublished observation).

4.2 ROS and dyslipidaemia
In addition to the inactivation of NO, a ROS-mediated loss of glycosaminoglycan may lead to reductions in capillary endothelium-bound lipoprotein lipase action and thereby help to account for the profile of plasma hypertriglyceridaemia and reduced high density lipoprotein levels in IRS and type II diabetes [10]. Furthermore, in addition to encouraging platelet aggregation by limiting the release of prostacyclin from the endothelium, dyslipidaemia and in particular elevated levels of very low density lipoprotein, contributes to the generation of a pro-thrombotic environment via an increase in circulating levels of the anti-fibrinolytic factor plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, derived from the endothelium [3]. In addition, the ability of the endothelium to oxidatively modify low density lipoprotein particles [12], which are small and dense in diabetes and particularly vulnerable to oxidation [70,71], creates the environment for enhanced foam cell formation in diabetic atherogenesis [72].


    5 Antioxidants and diabetes
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Endothelial dysfunction,...
 3 Endothelial dysfunction and...
 4 Endothelium and oxidant...
 5 Antioxidants and diabetes
 6 Conclusions
 References
 
5.1 Antioxidants and endothelial function in diabetes
There is a great deal of evidence to support a role for ROS in the impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation observed in a variety of vascular preparations isolated from experimental diabetic animals [73–80]. This dysfunction is thought to principally involve the reduced bioavailability of NO resulting from its rapid inactivation by superoxide radical [64,65]. Such a disruptive influence of ROS in diabetes is supported by the demonstration of a comparable endothelial dysfunction in vitamin E-deprived rats [81,82]. Similarly, defective endothelium-dependent vasodilation in type II diabetic subjects [32–34,69] can be reversed by dietary ascorbic acid [67]. This is also the case in type I diabetics [83]. Interestingly, ascorbic acid has recently also been demonstrated to reduce blood pressure in hypertensives [84].

These beneficial actions of ascorbic acid may feasibly result from an enhanced bioavailability of vascular NO but could also conceivably arise from a stimulation of endothelial NO synthesis [85]. A reduction in NO formation could conceivably arise in diabetes following hyperglycaemia-dependent pseudohypoxia, since this condition is associated with the depletion of NADPH and tetrahydrobiopterin, which act as co-factors for NO synthase activity [12,86,87]. Furthermore, another result of pseudohypoxia, diacylglycerol formation, may activate protein kinase C and lead to the stimulation of vascular oxidase systems [86–88]. This, together with the production of superoxide anion by ‘uncoupled’ NOS, may generate significant sources of endothelial superoxide anion (see above).

Reductions in vascular NO signalling mediated by ROS, may be accompanied in diabetes by a reduced synthesis of prostacyclin [88,89] coupled with an undiminished or even enhanced formation of vasoconstrictor agents, which is also a factor in restricted vasodilation [79,80]. In particular, hyperglycaemia leads to endothelium-derived prostaglandin G2 and thromboxane A2 formation [90] and in common with hyperinsulinaemia, stimulates endothelin-1 (ET-1) synthesis in endothelial cells [91]. Indeed, ET-1 and another potent vasoconstrictor and pro-mitogenic peptide, angiotensin II derived from the vascular renin–angiotensin system [92,93], have been linked with the development of clinical diabetic macroangiopathy [25,94]. In this regard, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril, has very recently been demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death in a major clinical trial involving diabetics [95].

In addition, these vasoconstrictor peptides may also play a local role in the aetiology of microangiopathy, especially in the kidney, by maintaining post-capillary resistance in the face of diabetic arteriolar vasodilation and so facilitating capillary hypertension [96]. Ironically, superoxide anion may help mediate this paradoxical arteriolar vasodilation and increase in microvascular blood flow, which is an early feature of diabetes attendant on hyperglycaemia, by enhancing the calcium signalling pathway involved in agonist-stimulated NO synthesis [97,98]. An enhanced endothelial uptake of L-arginine, the substrate for NO synthase, has also been implicated in an effect of hyperglycaemia to stimulate basal NO synthesis [88].

NO per se has important antioxidant activities in the vessel wall, including the direct scavenging of superoxide anion and the inhibition of lipid peroxidation [99–101]. Indeed, the efficiency of NO in its antioxidant role, may make basal endothelium-dependent, NO-mediated vasodilator function especially vulnerable to inhibition during an oxidative insult. Conversely, the loss of basal endothelium-derived NO in this manner, may also serve to help preserve vasodilator responses to endothelial agonists and NO donors [102]. However, any lesion in the endogenous NO signalling pathway has major pathological implications for macroangiographic disease progression in diabetes, resulting from a dysregulation of vascular tone, proliferation, platelet aggregation, coagulation, fibrinolysis, leukocyte adhesion, vascular permeability and lipoprotein oxidation [12]. Many of these pro-atherogenic sequelae may be triggered by hyperglycaemia via the formation of AGE, which been shown to inactivate NO and generate endothelial intracellular oxidant stress [9,12,56].

5.2 Antioxidant status in diabetes
There are several lines of evidence to suggest that antioxidant defences may be lower in diabetes. These include reports of reduced plasma/serum total antioxidant status or free radical scavenging activity and increased plasma oxidisability in type II diabetics, together with demonstrations of reduced levels of specific antioxidants such as ascorbic acid and vitamin E [54,103–109]. In addition, the activities of the antioxidant enzymes catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase, have been described as reduced in diabetics [34,109,110]. A diminution in the endothelial synthesis of NO has also been suggested in type II diabetics [69], which apart from detracting from vascular antioxidant defence (see above), would of course compound any defect in the anti-atherogenic signalling role of NO [12].

5.3 The potential of antioxidant therapy
Antioxidant therapy, achieved by supplementation with pharmaceutical preparations of antioxidant nutrients and/or non-nutrients [111–113], may conceivably confer both cardiovascular and metabolic benefits in diabetes. This notion is well grounded in the theory surrounding the role of oxidative stress in disease [114]. In addition, it is supported by evidence of reduced antioxidant defences in diabetes and also by experimental findings that antioxidants improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation and insulin sensitivity (see above). Indeed, epidemiological data provide strong associations between the dietary intake of antioxidant nutrients and protection against cardiovascular disease [113,115–117]. Furthermore, a recent report has suggested a role for low serum carotenoid status in the development of insulin resistance and diabetes [118].

However, despite some early indications from clinical trials that vitamin E could protect against coronary artery disease [116,117,119], including that associated with diabetes [120], more recent studies with vitamin E, vitamin C and beta-carotene supplements have failed to clearly demonstrate a retardation in cardiovascular disease progression [119,121]. The reasons for these disappointing results are unclear; but may simply highlight the need to intervene at a suitable moment in disease progression in patients at specific risk, using the most appropriate balance of ‘harmonised’ and correctly targeted antioxidants at an optimal dose and for an adequate duration [122]. A more comprehensive evaluation of the cardiovascular benefits of a range of naturally occurring antioxidants, including vitamin E, vitamin C, beta-carotene and selenium as potential ‘nutriceuticals’, awaits the outcome of a number of ongoing clinical trials [119]. However, a preliminary report from one of these, the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, indicates that vitamin E supplementation did not reduce the incidence of cardiovascular endpoints after 4.5 years of use [95].


    6 Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Endothelial dysfunction,...
 3 Endothelial dysfunction and...
 4 Endothelium and oxidant...
 5 Antioxidants and diabetes
 6 Conclusions
 References
 
A multifaceted endothelial dysfunction, involving the generation of oxidant stress, is conceivably central to the principal manifestations of IRS, including insulin resistance and associated macrovascular disease (see Fig. 2). Indeed, the parallel development of atherosclerotic, diabetic macroangiopathy and the metabolic corollaries of insulin resistance [10], can be considered as manifestations of endothelial dysfunction at distinct vascular sites. This would then account for the commonality of vascular endothelial dysfunction and relative resistance to insulin-mediated glucose uptake in metabolic disorders such as type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease such as atherosclerosis, essential hypertension, congestive heart failure and cardiac syndrome X (microvascular angina) [123].


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Hypothesised central role for a multifaceted, disseminated endothelial dysfunction in the development of insulin resistance syndrome, macroangiopathy and type II diabetes.

 
Furthermore, it is apparent that antioxidant intervention in both experimental and clinical diabetes, can reverse endothelial dysfunction which may itself be related to an insufficient antioxidant defence [34]. However, while antioxidants are proving essential tools in the investigation of oxidant stress-related diabetic pathologies and despite the obvious potential merit of a replacement style therapy, the safety and efficacy of antioxidant supplementation in any future treatment, remains to be established.

Time for primary review 25 days.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Endothelial dysfunction,...
 3 Endothelial dysfunction and...
 4 Endothelium and oxidant...
 5 Antioxidants and diabetes
 6 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Reaven G.M. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Physiol Rev (1995) 75:473–486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Chisholm D.J., Campbell L.V., Kraegen E.W. Pathogenesis of the insulin resistance syndrome (syndrome X). Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol (1997) 24:782–784.[ISI][Medline]
  3. McCarty M.F. Haemostatic concomitants of syndrome X. Med Hypotheses (1994) 44:179–193.[CrossRef][ISI]
  4. Stamler J., Vaccaro O., Neaton J.D., et al. The multiple risk factor intervention trial research group: diabetes, other risk factors and 12-year cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Diabetes Care (1993) 16:434–444.[Abstract]
  5. Tooke J.E., Shore A.C., Cohen R.A., et al. Diabetic angiopathy: tracking down the culprits. J Diabetes Complications (1996) 10:173–181.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Vanhoutte P.M. Endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J (1997) 18:E19–E29.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature (1990) 362:801–809.
  8. Hsueh W.A., Quinones M.J., Creager M.A. Endothelium in insulin resistance and diabetes. Diebetes Rev (1997) 5:343–352.
  9. Stehouwer C.D.A., Lambert J., Donker A.J.M., et al. Endothelial dysfunction and pathogenesis of diabetic angiopathy. Cardiovasc Res (1997) 34:55–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Pinkney J.H., Coen D.A., Stehouwer C.D.A., et al. Endothelial dysfunction: cause of the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes (1997) 16:S9–S13.
  11. Tooke J.E., Goh K.L. Endotheliopathy precedes type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care (1998) 21:2047–2048.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Laight D.W., Carrier M.J., Änggård E.E. Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathogenesis of diabetic macroangiopathy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (1999) 15:274–282.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Steinberg H.O., Brechtel G., Johnson A., et al. Insulin-mediated skeletal muscle vasodilation is nitric oxide dependent. J Clin Invest (1994) 94:1172–1179.[ISI][Medline]
  14. Scherrer U., Randin D., Vollenweider P., et al. Nitric oxide release accounts for insulin's vascular effects in humans. J Clin Invest (1994) 94:2511–2515.[ISI][Medline]
  15. Taddei S., Virdis A., Mattei P., et al. Effect of insulin on acetylcholine-induced vasodilation in normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension. Circulation (1995) 92:147–152.[ISI]
  16. Laight D.W., Kaw A.V., Carrier M.J., et al. Pharmacological modulation of endothelial function by insulin in the rat aorta. J Pharm Pharmacol (1998) 50:1117–1120.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Laakso M., Edelam S.V., Brechtel G., et al. Impaired insulin-mediated skeletal muscle blood flow in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes (1992) 41:1076–1083.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Steinberg H.O., Chaker H., Leaming R., et al. Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction. J Clin Invest (1996) 97:2601–2610.[ISI][Medline]
  19. Shoemaker J.K., Bonen A. Vascular actions of insulin in health and disease. Can J App Physiol (1995) 20:127–154.
  20. Tack C.J., Ong M.K., Lutterman J.A., et al. Insulin-induced vasodilation and endothelial function in obesity/insulin resistance. Effects of troglitazone. Diabetologia (1998) 41:569–576.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  21. Vischer U.M. Insulin resistance and the regulation of vascular tone: is insulin a vasodilator? Eur J Endocrinol (1998) 138:262–263.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  22. Walker A.B., Dores J., Buckingham R.E., et al. Impaired insulin induced attenuation of noradrenaline-mediated vasoconstriction in insulin-resistant obese Zucker rats. Clin Sci (1997) 93:235–241.[ISI][Medline]
  23. Lembo G., Morella A., Lanni F., et al. Vascular insulin resistance in hypertension. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis (1997) 7:124–126.[ISI]
  24. Panza J.A., Casino P.R., Kilcoyne C.M., et al. Role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in the abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation of patients with essential hypertension. Circulation (1993) 87:1468–1474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Perfetto F., Tarquini R., de Leonardis V., et al. Angiopathy affects circulating endothelin-1 levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol (1995) 32:263–267.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Sarman B., Toth M., Somogyi A. Role of endothelin-1 in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Rev (1998) 14:171–175.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Velasquez M.T., Bhathena S.J., Striffler J.S., et al. Role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in glucose metabolism and renal injury in diabetes. Metabolism (1998) 47:7–11.[ISI][Medline]
  28. Anderson S. Physiologic actions and molecular expression of the renin–angiotensin system in the diabetic rat. Miner Electrolyte Metab (1998) 24:406–411.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Giugliano D., Marfella R., Acampora R., et al. Effects of perindopril and carvedilol on endothelium-dependent vascular functions in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Diabetes Care (1998) 21:631–636.[Abstract]
  30. O’Driscoll G., Green D., Maiorana A., et al. Improvement in endothelial function by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in NIDDM. J Am Coll Cardiol (1999) 33:1506–1511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ganrot P.O. Insulin resistance syndrome: possible key role of blood flow in resting muscle. Diabtologia (1993) 36:876–879.[CrossRef]
  32. McVeigh G.E., Brennan G.M., Johnston G.D., et al. Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation in patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia (1992) 35:771–776.[ISI][Medline]
  33. Hogikyan R.V., Halter J.B., Galecki A.T., et al. Specific impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in subjects with type II diabetes independent of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1998) 83:1946–1952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Mohan I.K., Das U.N. Oxidant stress, antioxidants and nitric oxide in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Med Sci Res (1997) 25:55–57.[ISI]
  35. Wiernsperger N. Vascular defects in the aetiology of peripheral insulin resistance in diabetes. A critical review of hypotheses and facts. Diabetes Metab Rev (1994) 10:287–307.[ISI][Medline]
  36. Baron A.D., Steinberg H.O., Chaker H., et al. Insulin-mediated skeletal muscle vasodilation contributes to both insulin sensitivity and responsiveness in lean humans. J Clin Invest (1995) 96:779–786.
  37. Baron A.D. The coupling of glucose metabolism and perfusion in human skeletal muscle. The potential role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Diabetes (1996) 45:S105–S109.[CrossRef]
  38. Petrie J.R., Ueda S., Webb D.J., et al. Endothelial nitric oxide production and insulin sensitivity. A physiological link with importance for pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Circulation (1996) 93:1331–1333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Avogaro A., Piarulli F., Valerio A., et al. Forearm nitric oxide balance, vascular relaxation and glucose metabolism in NIDDM patients. Diabetes (1997) 46:1040–1046.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Utriainen T., Mäkimattila S., Virkamaki A., et al. Dissociation between insulin sensitivity of glucose uptake and endothelial function in normal subjects. Diabetologia (1996) 39:1477–1482.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  41. Baron A.D., Laakso M., Brechtel G., et al. Mechanism of insulin resistance in IDDM: a major role for reduced skeletal muscle blood flow. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1991) 73:637–643.[Abstract]
  42. Summers L.K.M., Samra J.S., Frayn K.N. Impaired postprandial tissue regulation of blood flow in insulin resistance: a determinant of cardiovascular risk? Atherosclerosis (1999) 147:11–15.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  43. Miles P.D.G., Li S., Hart M., et al. Mechanism of insulin resistance in experimental hyperinsulinaemic dogs. J Clin Invest (1998) 101:202–211.[ISI][Medline]
  44. Castillo C., Bogardus C., Bergman R., et al. Interstitial insulin concentrations determine glucose uptake rates but not insulin resistance in lean and obese men. J Clin Invest (1994) 93:10–16.[ISI][Medline]
  45. Miles P.D.G., Levisetti M., Reichart D., et al. Kinetics of insulin action in vivo: identification of rate limiting steps. Diabetes (1995) 44:947–953.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  46. Lillioja S., Young A.A., Culter C.L., et al. Skeletal muscle capillary density and fiber type are possible determinants of in vivo insulin resistance in man. J Clin Invest (1987) 80:415–424.[ISI][Medline]
  47. Wascher T.C. Endothelial transport processes and tissue metabolism: evidence for microvascular endothelial dysfunction in insulin-resistant diseases? Eur J Clin Invest (1997) 27:831–835.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  48. Natali A. Skeletal muscle blood flow and insulin action. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis (1997) 7:105–109.[ISI]
  49. Laine H., Yki-Jarvinen H., Kirvela O., et al. Insulin resistance of glucose uptake in skeletal muscle cannot be ameliorated by enhancing endothelium-dependent blood flow in obesity. J Clin Invest (1998) 101:1156–1162.[ISI][Medline]
  50. Bloomgarden Z.T. Insulin resistance: current concepts. Clin Ther (1998) 20:216–231.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  51. Wolff S.P. Diabetes mellitus and free radicals. Br Med Bull (1993) 49:642–652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Gopaul N.K., Mallet A.I., Betteridge D.J., et al. Plasma 8-epi-PGF2{alpha} levels are elevated in individuals with NIDDM. FEBS Lett (1995) 368:225–229.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  53. Laight D.W., Kengatharan K.M., Gopaul N.K., et al. Investigation of oxidant stress and vasodepression to glyceryl trinitrate in the obese Zucker rat in vivo. Br J Pharmacol (1998) 125:895–901.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  54. Ceriello A., Bortolotti N., Crescentini A., et al. Antioxidant defences are reduced during the oral glucose tolerance test in normal and non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects. Eur J Clin Invest (1998) 28:329–333.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  55. Giugliano D., Paolisso G., Ceriello A. Oxidative stress and diabetic vascular complications. Diabetes Care (1996) 19:257–267.[Abstract]
  56. Taniguchi N.H., Asahi M., Takahashi M., et al. Involvement of glycation and oxidative stress in diabetic macroangiopathy. Diabetes (1996) 45:S81–S83.[ISI][Medline]
  57. Tesfamariam B. Free radicals in diabetic endothelial cell dysfunction. Free Radic Biol Med (1993) 16:383–391.[CrossRef][ISI]
  58. Bult H. Nitric oxide and atherosclerosis: possible implications for therapy. Mol Med Today (1996) 2:510–518.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  59. Pritchard K.A.J., Groszek L., Smalley D.M., et al. Native low-density lipoprotein increases endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase generation of superoxide anion. Circ Res (1994) 77:354–357.[ISI]
  60. Paolisso G., D’Amore A., Volpe C., et al. Evidence for a relationship between oxidative stress and insulin action in NIDDM patients. Metabolism (1994) 43:1426–1429.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  61. Laight D.W., Desai K.M., Gopaul N.K., et al. F2-isoprostane evidence of oxidant stress in the insulin resistant obese Zucker rat: effects of vitamin E. Eur J Pharmacol (1999) 377:89–92.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  62. Laight D.W., Desai K.M., Gopaul N.K., et al. Pro-oxidant challenge in vivo provokes the onset of NIDDM in the insulin resistant obese Zucker rat. Br J Pharmacol (1999) 128:269–271.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  63. Bertelsen M., Andersson M.B., Änggård E.E., et al. Role of reactive oxygen species on tans-endothelial insulin transport. Br J Pharmacol (1998) 125:P120.[CrossRef]
  64. Gryglewski R.J., Palmer R.M., Moncada S. Superoxide anion is involved in the breakdown of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature (1986) 329:454–458.
  65. Darley-Usmar V., White R. Disruption of vascular signalling by the reaction of nitric oxide with superoxide: implications for cardiovascular disease. Exp Physiol (1997) 82:305–316.[Abstract]
  66. Laight D.W., Kaw A.V., Carrier M.J., et al. Interaction between superoxide anion and nitric oxide in the regulation of vascular endothelial function. Br J Pharmacol (1998) 124:238–244.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  67. Ting H.H., Timimi F.K., Boles K.S., et al. Vitamin C improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest (1996) 97:22–28.[ISI][Medline]
  68. Levine G.N., Frei B., Koulouris S.N., et al. Ascorbic acid reverses endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation (1996) 93:1107–1113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Mäkimattila S., Liu M.-L., Vakkilainen J., et al. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care (1999) 22:973–981.[Abstract]
  70. Anderson J.W., Gowri M.S., Turner J., et al. Antioxidant supplementation effects on low density lipoprotein oxidation for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Nutr (1999) 18:451–461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Verges B.L. Dyslipidaemia in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab (1999) 25:32–40.[ISI][Medline]
  72. Witztum J.L. The oxidation hypothesis of atherosclerosis. Lancet (1994) 344:793–795.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  73. Pieper G.M., Gross G.J. Oxygen free radicals abolish endothelium-dependent relaxation in diabetic rat aorta. Am J Physiol (1988) 255:H825–H833.[ISI][Medline]
  74. Langenstroer P., Peiper G.M. Regulation of spontaneous EDRF release in diabetic rat aorta by oxygen free radicals. Am J Physiol (1992) 263:H257–H265.[ISI][Medline]
  75. Diederich D., Skopec J., Diederich A., et al. Endothelial dysfunction in mesenteric resistance arteries of diabetic rats: role of free radicals. Am J Physiol (1994) 266:H1153–H1161.[ISI][Medline]
  76. Hattori Y., Kawasaki H., Abe K., et al. Superoxide dismutase recovers altered endothelium-dependent relaxation in diabetic rat aorta. Am J Physiol (1991) 261:H1086–H1094.[ISI][Medline]
  77. Keegan A., Walbank H., Cotter M.A., et al. Chronic vitamin E treatment prevents defective endothelium-dependent relaxation in diabetic rat aorta. Diabetologia (1995) 38:1475–1478.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  78. Rosen P., Ballhausen T., Bloch W., et al. Endothelial relaxation is disturbed by oxidative stress in the diabetic rat heart: influence of tocopherol as antioxidant. Diabetologia (1995) 38:1157–1168.[ISI][Medline]
  79. Dai F.-X., Diederich A., Skopec J., et al. Diabetes-induced endothelial dysfunction in STZ-treated rats: role of prostaglandin endoperoxides and free radicals. J Am Soc Nephrol (1993) 4:1327–1336.[Abstract]
  80. Tesfamariam B. Free radicals in diabetic endothelial cell dysfunction. Free Radic Biol Med (1993) 16:383–391.[CrossRef][ISI]
  81. Ralevic V., Milla P.J., Burnstock G. Effects of chronic vitamin E deficiency on vascular function — a study of sympathetic nerves, smooth muscle and endothelium of the mesenteric arterial bed of the rat. Br J Pharmacol (1995) 116:2983–2988.[ISI][Medline]
  82. Davidge S.T., Ojimba J., McLaughlin M.K. Vascular function in the vitamin E-deprived rat. Hypertension (1998) 31:830–835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. Timimi F.K., Ting H.H., Haley M., et al. Vitamin C improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in IDDM. J Am Coll Nephrol (1998) 31:552–557.
  84. Duffy S.J., Gokce N., Holbrook M., et al. Treatment of hypertension with ascorbic acid. Lancet (1999) 354:2048–2049.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  85. Heller R., Münscher-Paulig F., Gräbner R., et al. L-Ascorbic acid potentiates nitric oxide synthesis in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem (1999) 274:8254–8260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  86. Honing M.J.H., Morrison P.J., Banga J.D., et al. Nitric oxide availability in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Rev (1998) 14:241–249.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  87. Giugliano D., Paolisso G., Coppla L. Hyperglycaemia and endothelial dysfunction in human diabetes: does oxidative stress play a role? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis (1997) 7:100–104.[ISI]
  88. Sobrevia L., Mann G.E. Dysfunction of the endothelial nitric oxide signalling pathway in diabetes and hyperglycaemia. Exp Phyisol (1997) 82:423–452.
  89. Ono H., Umeda F., Inoguchi T., et al. Glucose inhibits prostacyclin production by cultured aortic endothelial cells. Thromb Haemost (1988) 60:174–177.[ISI][Medline]
  90. Tesfamariam B., Brown M.L., Deykin D., et al. Elevated glucose promotes generation of endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor prostanoids in rabbit aorta. J Clin Invest (1990) 85:929–932.[ISI][Medline]
  91. Yamaguchi T., Ohnaka K., Takayanagi R., et al. Enhanced secretion of endothelin 1 by elevated glucose levels from cultured endothelial cells. FEBS Lett (1990) 267:16–18.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  92. Falkenhahn M., Gohlke P., Paul M., et al. The renin–angiotensin system in the heart and vascular wall: new therapeutic aspects. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol (1994) 24:S6–S13.
  93. Schalekamp M.A.D.H. Renin–angiotensin system components and endothelial proteins as markers of diabetic microvascular disease. Clin Invest (1993) 71:S3–S6.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  94. Hsueh W.A., Anderson P.W. Systemic hypertension and the renin–angiotensin system in diabetic vascular complications. Am J Cardiol (1993) 72:14H–21H.[CrossRef][Medline]
  95. Kleinert S. HOPE for cardiovascular disease prevention with ACE-inhibitor ramipril. Lancet (1999) 354:841.[ISI][Medline]
  96. Jaap A.J., Tooke J.E. Pathophysiology of microvascular disease in NIDDM. Clin Sci (1995) 89:3–12.[ISI][Medline]
  97. Graier W.F., Posch K., Wascher T.C. Role of superoxide anions in changes of endothelial vasoactive response during acute hyperglycaemia. Horm Metab Res (1997) 29:622–626.[ISI][Medline]
  98. Graier W.F., Simecek S., Hoebel B.G., et al. Antioxidants prevent high-D-glucose-enhanced endothelial Ca2+/cGMP response by scavenging superoxide anions. Eur J Pharmacol (1997) 322:113–122.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  99. Kanner J., Harel S., Granit R. Nitric oxide as an antioxidant. Arch Biochem Biophys (1991) 289:130–136.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  100. Halliwell B. Oxidative stress, nutrition and health. Experimental strategies for optimization of nutritional antioxidant intake in humans. Free Radic Res (1996) 25:57–74.[ISI][Medline]
  101. Hogg N., Kalyanaraman B. Nitric oxide and lipid peroxidation. Biochim Biophys Acta (1999) 1411:378–384.[Medline]
  102. Laight D.W., Kaw A.V., Carrier M.J., et al. Interaction between superoxide anion and nitric oxide in the regulation of vascular endothelial function. Br J Pharmacol (1998) 124:238–244.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  103. Ceriello A., Bortolotti N., Falleti E., et al. Total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter in NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care (1997) 20:194–197.[Abstract]
  104. Ceriello A., Bortolotti N., Pirisi M., et al. Total plasma antioxidant capacity predicts thrombosis-prone status in NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care (1997) 20:1589–1593.[Abstract]
  105. Aguirre F., Martin I., Grinspon D., et al. Oxidative damage, plasma antioxidant capacity and glycaemic control in elderly patients. Free Radic Biol Med (1998) 24:580–585.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  106. Haffner S.M., Agil A., Mykkanen L., et al. Plasma oxidisability in subjects with normal glucose tolerance, impaired glucose tolerance and NIDDM. Diabetes Care (1995) 18:646–653.[Abstract]
  107. Maxwell S.R.J., Thomason H., Sandler D., et al. Poor glycaemic control is associated with reduced serum free radical scavenging (antioxidant) activity in NIDDM. Ann Clin Biochem (1997) 34:638–644.[ISI][Medline]
  108. Paolisso G., D’Amore A., Balbi V., et al. Plasma vitamin C affects glucose homeostasis in healthy subjects and in NIDDM. Am J Physiol (1994) 266:E261–E268.[ISI][Medline]
  109. Ashour M., Salem S., Hassaneen H., et al. Antioxidant status and IDDM. J Clin Biochem Nutr (1999) 26:99–107.
  110. Tüzün S., Girgin F.K., Sözmen E.Y., et al. Antioxidant status in experimental type 2 diabetes mellitus: effects of glibenclamide and glipizide on various rat tissues. Exp Toxicol Pathol (1999) 51:436–441.[ISI][Medline]
  111. Vendemiale G., Grattagliano I., Altomare E. An update on the role of free radicals an diabetes antioxidant defense in human disease. Int J Clin Lab Res (1999) 29:49–55.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  112. Patel M., Day B.J. Metalloporphyrin class of therapeutic catalytic antioxidants. Trends Pharmacol Sci (1999) 20:359–364.[CrossRef][Medline]
  113. Nuttall S.L., Kendall M.J., Martin U. Antioxidant therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Q J Med (1999) 92:239–244.[ISI]
  114. Maxwell S.R.J. Prospects for the use of antioxidant therapies. Drugs (1995) 49:345–361.[ISI][Medline]
  115. Palace V.P., Khaper N., Qin Q., et al. Antioxidant potentials of vitamin A and carotenoids and their relevance to heart disease. Free Radic Biol Med (1999) 26:746–761.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  116. Kendall M.J., Nuttall S.L., Martin U. Antioxidant therapy — a new therapeutic option for reducing mortality from coronary artery disease. J Clin Pharm Ther (1998) 23:323–325.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  117. Gaziano J.M. Antioxidant vitamins and cardiovascular disease. Proc Assoc Am Phys (1999) 111:2–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  118. Ford E.S., Will J.C., Bowman B.A., et al. Diabetes mellitus and serum carotenoids: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Survey. Amount J Epidemiol (1999) 149:168–176.
  119. Marchioli R. Antioxidant vitamins and prevention of cardiovascular disease: laboratory, epidemiological and clinical trial data. Pharmacol Res (1999) 40:227–238.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  120. Jain S.K., McVie R., Jaramillo J.J., et al. The effect of modest vitamin E supplementation on lipid peroxidation products and other cardiovascular risk factors in diabetic patients. Lipids (1996) 31:S87–S90.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  121. Maxwell S.R.J. Antioxidant vitamin supplements. Drug Safety (1999) 21:253–266.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  122. Bellomo G. Is it really time to perform large intervention trials with antioxidant vitamins to prevent cardiovascular disease? Pharmacol Res (1999) 40:207–208.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  123. Stern M.P. Do NIDDM and cardiovascular disease share common antecedents? Ann Intern Med (1996) 124:110–116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. G. Boyle, P. J. Logan, M.-A. Ewart, J. A. Reihill, S. A. Ritchie, J. M. C. Connell, S. J. Cleland, and I. P. Salt
Rosiglitazone Stimulates Nitric Oxide Synthesis in Human Aortic Endothelial Cells via AMP-activated Protein Kinase
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11210 - 11217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


</
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laight, D.W.
Right arrow Articles by Änggård, E.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed