Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1999 43(3):712-720; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00083-8
© 1999 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Musialek, P.
Right arrow Articles by Casadei, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Musialek, P.
Right arrow Articles by Casadei, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1999, European Society of Cardiology

Changes in extracellular pH mediate the chronotropic responses to L-arginine

Piotr Musialeka,b,*, David J Patersonb and Barbara Casadeia

aDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
bUniversity Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford, UK

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-1865-220-428 or +44-1865-220132; fax: +44-1865-768-844 piotr.musialek{at}clinical-medicine.ox.ac.uk barbara.casadei{at}cardiov.ox.ac.uk

Received 2 December 1998; accepted 22 January 1999


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 5 Summary
 References
 
We have recently shown that exogenous nitric oxide (NO) elicits a positive chronotropic response by stimulating the hyperpolarization activated current, If. Objective: To examine whether L-arginine (L-Arg) can mimic the chronotropic effect of NO by enhancing its endogenous production. Methods: In spontaneously beating guinea pig atria we evaluated the heart rate (HR) response to increasing concentrations of L-Arg (1 µmol/l to 10 mmol/l), and compared it with that for D-Arg or L-lysine (L-Lys) (all in free base (FB) or hydrochloride (HCl) formulation). Results: L-ArgFB >100 µmol/l caused a reversible dose-dependent increase in HR (peak effect +64±7 bpm at 10 mmol/l, P<0.05, n=8). However, a similar HR response occurred with D-ArgFB (n=7) or L-LysFB (n=6). All FB formulations increased the perfusate pH (peak [pH]o=8.61±0.03). Although alkalinization can stimulate NO release from the endothelium, this is unlikely to have contributed to HR changes in our preparation, since neither NG-methyl-L-arginine, (100–500 µmol/l, which per se reduced HR by 8±1%, P<0.05, n=9) nor NO scavenging (fresh 5% red blood cells, n=9) caused a rightward shift of the concentration–response curve to L-ArgFB. Furthermore, as opposed to FB formulations, L-ArgHCl, D-ArgHCl or L-LysHCl >1 mmol/l significantly decreased HR and [pH]o (n=17). The chronotropic effects of L-ArgFB or L-ArgHCl were reproduced by changing [pH]o with NaOH (n=8) or HCl (n=7), whereas the HR increase with L-ArgFB was prevented by clamping [pH]o at 7.42±0.07 (n=10). Conclusions: In vitro, L-Arg can markedly affect HR through a pH-mediated, NO-independent mechanism. Our data show that the opposing changes in [pH]o induced by different formulations of L-Arg can importantly confound the assessment of the biological effects of this amino acid.

KEYWORDS L-Arginine; Nitric oxide; Chronotropic agents; Heart rate


    1 Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 5 Summary
 References
 
We have recently shown that exogenous nitric oxide (NO) can increase heart rate (HR) in vitro, through the activation of an intracellular pathway involving cGMP and the hyperpolarization-activated current If [1]. Since NO is tonically released in the heart [2], this mechanism may be involved in the regulation of intrinsic HR. Some circumstantial evidence supports this hypothesis; for instance, conscious endothelial NO synthase (eNOS)-deficient mice, which lack the major source of NO synthesis in the cardiovascular system, have significantly lower HR than wild type mice [3,4]. Conversely, administration of 1 mmol of the NOS substrate L-arginine (L-Arg) has been shown to elicit a positive chronotropic response in vitro [5]. It is debatable, however, whether in the absence of prolonged L-Arg depletion or inducible NO synthase (iNOS) stimulation, extracellular supply of L-Arg would result in increased NO production [6,7]. Indeed, since the intracellular concentration of this amino acid far exceeds the half-maximal saturating concentration for eNOS [6,7], extracellular provision of L-Arg should not affect NO synthesis. Recent findings, however, suggest that cytoplasmic stores of L-Arg may not be directly accessible to NOS and delivery of extracellular L-Arg to the caveolae may be required for NO synthesis [8]. Thus, the aim of this study was twofold. First, does endogenous NO production regulate intrinsic HR? Secondly, does L-Arg supplementation exert a chronotropic effect by increasing the synthesis of NO? We found that inhibition of NOS has a small but significant negative chronotropic effect in isolated guinea pig atria. Although extracellular supply of L-Arg produced significant changes in HR, these were not mediated by an increased synthesis of NO. Indeed, we demonstrate that arginine-induced changes in extracellular pH are responsible for the chronotropic effect of this amino acid.


    2 Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 5 Summary
 References
 
Experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and under the United Kingdom "Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986".

The spontaneously beating guinea pig atrial preparation has been described in detail previously [1]. Briefly, the atria were mounted vertically in a preheated (37±0.1°C), continuously oxygenated, water jacketed bath containing 60 ml of Tyrode solution (Section 2.1). Sutures connected the right atrium to a stainless steel hook and the left atrium to an isometric force transducer (Harvard Apparatus). Data were acquired on a Power Macintosh 8500 computer using a Biopac MP100 data acquisition system and AcqKnowledge 3.5 software. Beating rate was triggered from contraction and the signals were displayed in real time. Data were stored on a compact disk for off-line analysis.

2.1 Solution and drugs
The Tyrode contained (mmol/l): NaCl 120, KCl 4, MgCl2 2, NaHCO3 25, CaCl2 1.8, NaH2PO4 0.1, glucose 11. The perfusate was aerated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (pH 7.4) and its temperature was continuously monitored (Digitron 1408-K gauge) and kept at 37±0.1°C. Water was of reagent grade from an Elga water purification system.

Two distinct formulations of L-Arg, L-Arg free base (L-ArgFB) and L-Arg hydrochloride (L-ArgHCl), were used. Concentration–response relationships were constructed by adding either L-ArgFB or L-ArgHCl cumulatively (in half-logarithmic increments every 4 to 5 min) to the perfusate in a concentration range from 1 µmol/l to 10 mmol/l.

To determine whether the effects of L-Arg are NO-mediated, we evaluated the chronotropic response to the inactive enantiomer D-Arg [9,10] both in the FB and HCl formulation. Moreover, we examined the rate effect of L-ArgFB after preincubation of the preparation with NG-methyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) to inhibit NOS (100–500 µmol/l for 30–40 min) [9] or in the presence of 5% suspension of fresh human red blood cells (RBC, prepared as described by Mendes Ribeiro et al. [11]) to scavenge NO [12–14]. Finally, we tested the chronotropic response to similar concentrations of L-Lysine (L-LysFB and L-LysHCl). This amino acid has properties similar to L-Arg, but it cannot serve as a substrate for NOS [10].

All drugs were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co.

2.2 pH Of the Tyrode perfusate
The pH of the perfusate was monitored throughout the experiments (Corning 220 pH-meter). Since millimolar concentrations of ArgFB or ArgHCl caused alkalinization or acidification of the perfusate respectively (see Results), we tested whether similar changes in pH, obtained by adding sodium hydroxide (NaOH, stock concentration 0.01 to 0.1 mol/l) or hydrochloride (HCl, stock 0.01 to 0.1 mol/l), could mimic the rate response to the two formulations of arginine. In addition, we evaluated the chronotropic response to L-ArgFB while clamping pH by adding HCl to the perfusate.

2.3 Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean±SEM (±SD for pH measurements). One-way analysis of variance followed by Fisher’s posthoc test was used to evaluate intra- and intergroup differences. Statistical significance was accepted at P<0.05.


    3 Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 5 Summary
 References
 
After 120–200 min of stabilization, the spontaneous beating rate of atrial preparations reached a stable value which averaged at 179±3 bpm (n=54). The effect of time on the beating rate was tested in seven preparations. As shown in Fig. 1A (top trace), no significant changes in beating rate occurred over the time-course of the experiments reported below (–1±1 bpm after 30 min, –2±1 bpm after 60 min, both nonsignificant [NS]).


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Effect of the L- or D-isomer of ArgFB on the spontaneous beating rate of guinea pig atrial preparations. L-ArgFB or D-ArgFB was applied cumulatively in half-logarithmic increments to achieve concentrations ranging from 1 µmol/l to 10 mmol/l (the next dose added after a stable response to the previous concentration was reached). (a) Representative raw data traces showing the chronotropic response to L-ArgFB (middle trace), D-ArgFB (bottom trace), compared with a time control (top trace). Arrows indicate application of increasing concentrations of L-ArgFB (in mol/l); "w/o"=washout. (b) Mean data (±SEM) for eight experiments with L-ArgFB (open circles), and seven experiments with D-ArgFB (open diamonds). B/L indicates the basal beating rate after stabilization. * P<0.05 vs. B/L. Note that both L-ArgFB and D-ArgFB at concentrations >0.1 mmol/l cause a dose-dependent positive chronotropic effect, and the magnitude of this effect is similar for both stereoisomers of arginine.

 
3.1 Chronotropic response to L- and D-ArgFB and L-LysFB
Fig. 1A (middle trace) shows a typical chronotropic response to increasing concentrations of L-ArgFB in the isolated guinea pig atria with mean data for eight preparations plotted in Fig. 1B. Whereas 1 to 100 µmol/l of L-ArgFB had no effect on the beating rate, higher concentrations (≥500 µmol/l) elicited a reversible dose-dependent positive chronotropic response, which peaked at the maximal concentration used (+64±7 bpm at 10 mmol/l, P<0.05 vs. B/L [B/L indicates the basal beating rate after stabilization]). At these concentrations, however, L-ArgFB also caused a progressive increase in the pH of the perfusate (from 7.40±0.003 to 8.61±0.036, n=3 measurements, data not shown).

Identical results were obtained when similar concentrations of either the inactive D-isomer of ArgFB (n=7, see Fig. 1a bottom trace, and Fig. 1b) or L-LysFB (n=6) were tested; i.e., concentrations of D-ArgFB or L-LysFB ≥500 µmol/l elicited a dose-dependent positive chronotropic response with a peak increase in rate at 10 mmol/l (+68±6 bpm for D-ArgFB and +71±7 bpm for L-LysFB, P<0.05 vs. B/L for both). Likewise, D-ArgFB [15] and L-LysFB caused a progressive increase in the pH of the Tyrode perfusate (from 7.40±0.001 to 8.60±0.044) in the concentration range from 0.5 to 10 mmol/l.

3.2 Effect of NOS inhibition or NO scavenging on the chronotropic effect of ArgFB
An increase in extracellular pH has been previously shown to be the mechanism by which both L- and D-ArgFB can stimulate NO release in cultured endothelial cells [16]. To test whether a pH-mediated release of NO contributed to the increase in beating rate with the FB formulation of arginine, we examined the chronotropic response to L-ArgFB in the presence of L-NMMA (100–500 µmol/l, n=9), or after adding a NO scavenger to the perfusate (5% human RBC, n=9 [12–14]).

L-NMMA decreased the spontaneous beating rate by 8±1% (P<0.05, for a raw data trace see Fig. 2a trace) whereas the inactive D-isomer of NMMA (D-NMMA 100–500 µmol/l, n=6) [9] was ineffective (–0.4±0.5%, NS).


Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Chronotropic effect of L-ArgFB in guinea pig atrial preparations in the presence of L-NMMA or fresh RBC. (a) A raw data trace showing the HR response to inhibition of NOS with with L-NMMA (500 µmol/l). (b) Chronotropic effect (mean±SEM) of increasing concentrations of L-ArgFB after preincubation with L-NMMA (100–500 µmol/l, n=9 [filled circles]), or in the presence of 5% fresh human RBC to scavenge NO (n=9, open squares). B/L indicates the basal beating rate after reequilibration in the presence of L-NMMA or RBC. (c) (Filled squares) show the pH of the Tyrode perfusate at each concentration of L-ArgFB (in this graph, in the presence of RBC). * P<0.05 vs. B/L. Note that (1) L-NMMA caused a small decrease in spontaneous beating rate, and (2) neither L-NMMA nor RBC affected the chronotropic response to L-ArgFB (cf. Fig. 1).

 
L-NMMA or NO scavenging did not affect the concentration–response curve to L-ArgFB nor the concomitant changes in the perfusate pH (Fig. 2b and c). In both cases there was a dose-dependent increase in beating rate in a concentration range from 0.5 to 10 mmol/l, which was virtually identical to that seen with L-ArgFB alone (peak effect of +66±6 bpm with L-NMMA, and +68±6bpm with RBC, P<0.05 vs. B/L, Fig. 2b cf. Fig. 1).

3.3 Chronotropic response to the L- or D-isomer of ArgHCl or to L-LysHCl
The concentration–response to L-ArgHCl was tested in six preparations. Fig. 3a (top trace) and Fig. 3b show that L-ArgHCl had no effect on HR at concentrations from 1 µmol/l to 1 mmol/l whereas higher concentrations elicited a negative chronotropic effect (n=6, peak response of –16±3 bpm at 10 mmol/l, P<0.05) and decreased the pH of the perfusate (pH=7.28±0.026 at 10 mmol/l L-ArgHCl, see Fig. 3c). The D-isomer of ArgHCl (n=5, see Fig. 3a bottom trace, and Fig. 3b) or L-LysHCl (n=6) had a similar effect on rate (peak response at 10 mmol/l of –15±2 bpm and –12±2 bpm respectively), and produced virtually identical changes in the pH of the Tyrode solution (Fig. 3c).


Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Effect of the L- and D-isomer of ArgHCl on the spontaneous beating rate of guinea pig atrial preparations. (a) Representative raw data traces showing the chronotropic response to increasing concentrations of L-ArgHCl (top trace) or D-ArgHCl (bottom trace). Arrows indicate application of increasing concentrations of L-ArgHCl or D-ArgHCl (in mol/l); "w/o"=washout. (b) Mean data (±SEM) for six experiments with L-ArgHCl (open triangles) and six with D-ArgHCl (filled diamonds). (c) The pH (mean±SD) of the Tyrode perfusate at each concentration of L-ArgFB (n=6, [open triangles]) or D-ArgFB (n=6 [filled diamonds]). B/L denotes basal beating rate after stabilization. * P<0.05 vs. B/L. Note that both L-ArgHCl and D-ArgHCl, at concentrations >1 mmol/l, cause a dose-dependent negative chronotropic effect of similar magnitude; the reduction in beating rate is associated with a decrease in the perfusate pH.

 
3.4 Chronotropic effect of changes in the pH of the perfusate
To assess the importance of extracellular pH in determining the chronotropic effect of L-ArgFB or L-ArgHCl, we tested the HR response (1) to L-ArgFB while clamping the perfusate pH with HCl; (2) to pH changes obtained by adding NaOH or HCl to the Tyrode to mimic the pH effect of increasing concentrations of the FB or HCl formulation of arginine.

Fig. 4 shows that when the increase in pH associated with increasing concentrations of L-ArgFB was prevented by simultaneous application of HCl (n=10), the beating rate did not change (–1±1 bpm at 0.1 or 1 mmol/l, +1±2 bpm at 5 mmol/l, and +3±2 bpm at 10 mmol/l of L-ArgFB, pH range from 7.40±0.030 to 7.42±0.072). Fig. 5 (raw data in Fig. 5a top trace, mean data for eight experiments in Fig. 5b), on the other hand, shows the chronotropic effect of adding NaOH to the perfusate to mimic the pH changes seen with ArgFB. Each increase in pH (to 7.47±0.014->7.55±0.047->8.38±0.180->8.62±0.053, see Fig. 5c) was accompanied by an increase in HR of a magnitude similar to that seen with ArgFB (+7±1 bpm->+11±1 bpm->+43±5 bpm->+69±6 bpm, P<0.05, Fig. 5b, cf. Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Conversely, when HCl was used to mimic the pH changes seen with ArgHCl, we observed a decrease in HR of 7±1 bpm at pH=7.33±0.020 and of 17±1 bpm at pH=7.28±0.027 (n=7, P<0.05, Fig. 5a bottom trace and Fig. 5b, cf. Fig. 3). Thus, the chronotropic effect of L-ArgFB or L-ArgHCl was fully mimicked by modifying pH of the Tyrode perfusate.


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Chronotropic effect of simultaneous applications of increasing concentrations of L-ArgFB and HCl to prevent changes in pH. (a) A typical raw data trace. Arrows indicate application of increasing concentrations of L-ArgFB (0.5 mmol/l, 1 mmol/l, 5 mmol/l, and 10 mmol/l) together with HCl; "w/o"=washout. (b) Mean change in beating rate (±SEM) for 10 experiments (crossed boxes). (c) Mean pH (±SD) for the same 10 experiments (crossed boxes). B/L indicates the basal beating rate after stabilization. * P<0.05 vs. B/L. Note that the increase in rate with L-ArgFB does not occur when changes in the pH of the Tyrode solution are prevented.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 Chronotropic effect of mimicking (by adding NaOH or HCl) the changes in pH of the Tyrode perfusate seen with increasing concentrations of L-ArgFB or L-ArgHCl. (a) Typical raw data traces showing the chronotropic response to increases in extracellular pH (top trace) or decreases in extracellular pH (bottom trace). Arrows indicate application of NaOH or HCl, whereas actual values of the achieved [pH]o are reported below each trace. "w/o"=washout. (b) Mean change in beating rate (±SEM) for eight experiments with NaOH (pointing-up triangles) and seven experiments with HCl (pointing-down triangles). The corresponding values of extracellular pH (±SD) are shown in (c). B/L indicates basal beating rate after stabilization. * P<0.05 vs. B/L. Note that the chronotropic effect of L-ArgFB or L-ArgHCl is fully reproduced by changing the pH of the perfusing solution (cf. Fig. 1 and Fig. 3).

 

    4 Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 5 Summary
 References
 
The present study demonstrates that the NO precursor L-Arg can modulate mammalian HR in vitro at concentrations greater than 100 µmol/l. However, the chronotropic effect of L-Arg is not mediated by a substrate-dependent increase in NO production since (1) it also occurs with D-Arg and with another basic amino acid, L-Lys, and (2) it is not attenuated by inhibition of NOS or NO scavenging. Moreover, the chronotropic response to L-Arg varies with the formulation of this amino acid and with the associated changes in the perfusate pH; i.e., ArgFB causes an increase in beating rate and alkalinization of the perfusate, whereas ArgHCl elicits a negative chronotropic response and a decrease in pH. A casual relationship between extracellular pH and the chronotropic effect of L-Arg was confirmed by showing that the HR changes with the two formulations of L-Arg are fully mimicked by modifying extracellular pH with NaOH or HCl (in the absence of L-Arg), whereas preventing alkalinization of the perfusate with HCl abolishes the rate response to increasing concentrations of L-ArgFB.

4.1 Negative chronotropic effect of NOS inhibition
Constitutive NOS is expressed in the coronary endothelium, in atrial and ventricular myocytes, and in pacemaking tissue [17]. Recent evidence indicates that NO is tonically released in the mammalian heart where it reaches concentrations of 1–3 µmol/l [2]. Whereas endogenous NO is known to modulate cardiac contractility and relaxation [17,18] and to affect the chronotropic response to autonomic stimuli [19–21], its effect on basal HR has not been established.

We have recently shown that micromolar concentrations of NO donors elicit a NO–cGMP-dependent positive chronotropic response in vitro [1]. Here, we found that L-NMMA, a blocker of NOS, causes a reduction in the beating rate in guinea pig atria by 8±1% (P<0.05, see Fig. 2a), whereas the D-isomer of NMMA is ineffective. Similar reductions in HR with NOS inhibition have been incidentally reported by others in the rat in vitro [5,22,23] and following intracoronary infusion of L-NMMA in vivo in the dog [24,25], though in two other studies in the same species the HR reduction with NOS inhibition failed to reach statistical significance [19,26]. In addition, conscious eNOS-deficient mice have a significantly lower HR than the wild type mice [3,4]. Taken together these data indicate that endogenously released NO exerts a relatively small but significant tonic positive chronotropic effect.

4.2 Mechanism of the chronotropic effect of L-Arg
In addition to inhibiting NOS, enhancing the endogenous production of NO might provide another means of testing the importance of this molecule in regulating sino–atrial node activity. This could be achieved either by stimulation of NOS with "agonists" (such as bradykinin or substance P [18]) or, possibly, by increasing the extracellular provision of L-Arg. However, both bradykinin and substance P have been shown to exert a NO-independent negative chronotropic effect by stimulating the release of acetylcholine from local cholinergic neurons [27,28].

Circumstantial evidence suggests that L-Arg might exert a positive chronotropic effect through NO. For instance, an increase in HR in response to 1 mmol/l L-Arg was noted by Kojda et al. [5] in Langendorff-perfused rat hearts whereas NOS inhibition with N-nitro-L-arginine decreased the beating rate of this preparation. Although it is well established that L-Arg is the substrate for NO synthesis [9,10,29], the mechanism by which supplying high concentrations of this amino acid should boost NO production remains controversial. The intracellular concentration of L-Arg (800 to 1000 µmol/l in endothelial cells) is known to be ~tenfold higher than the plasma level, exceeding by far the half-maximal saturating concentration for the constitutive NOS (KM~3 µmol/l) [6,7]. This suggests that, in the absence of L-Arg depletion or iNOS activation [30], the extracellular supply of L-Arg should not be a limiting factor for NO production. Nonetheless, recent findings in cultured endothelial cells indicate that not all L-Arg stores may be available to NOS and direct delivery of extracellular L-Arg to the caveolae may be required for NO synthesis [8].

We found that concentrations of L-ArgFB greater than 100 µmol/l significantly increase the spontaneous beating rate. To assess whether an enhanced production of NO was responsible for the positive chronotropic response to L-ArgFB, we tested the effect of the D-isomer, D-ArgFB, and that of another basic amino acid, L-LysFB (neither of which can serve as a substrate for NOS). The lack of stereospecificity of the HR response to ArgFB (Fig. 1), and the fact that L-LysFB was equally effective, indicate that the chronotropic effect of L-ArgFB cannot be secondary to a substrate-related enhanced production of NO. Although both L- and D-ArgFB (and in fact any alkaline buffer) have been shown to stimulate NO release from cultured endothelial cells via an increase in [pH]o [16], this mechanism is unlikely to have contributed to HR changes in our preparation, since there was no rightward shift in the concentration–response curve to L-ArgFB in the presence of L-NMMA or RBC (Fig. 2, cf. Fig. 1). We then considered two other mechanisms that could potentially affect pacemaking: i.e., changes in the osmolarity and pH of the perfusate with L-Arg. Since only marked hyperosmolarity (≥150 mmol/l sucrose) affects HR in vitro [31,32], this mechanism could not play any significant part in the chronotropic effect of concentrations of L-Arg (500 µmol/l to 10 mmol/l) used in our experiments. However, we demonstrated that L-ArgFB and L-ArgHCl cause opposing changes in extracellular pH which play a key role in eliciting the chronotropic effect of this amino acid (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5). This is consistent with previous findings in isolated atrial preparations, where alkalosis was shown to elicit tachycardia whereas acidosis decreased HR, e.g., Ref. [33]. The cellular mechanism responsible for the pH-dependent modulation of the pacemaker activity has been elucidated by Satoh and Seyama [34] in isolated patch-clamped sino–atrial node cells. They showed that changing the extracellular pH from 7.4 to 8.5 caused an increase in spontaneous beating rate which was accompanied by a greater amplitude of the If current, and by an increase in the maximal conductance of the L-type calcium current and of the steady-state outward current (without affecting their gating properties). In contrast, decreasing pH from 7.4 to 6.5 elicited opposite effects on these ionic currents and on the beating rate.


    5 Summary
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 5 Summary
 References
 
In freshly isolated guinea pig atria we showed that inhibition of NOS has a small but significant negative chronotropic effect. Although we found that extracellular supply of L-Arg markedly affects the spontaneous beating rate, we provide evidence that this does not occur through an increased synthesis of NO. This finding is consistent with the idea that exogenous L-Arg cannot stimulate NO synthesis by the constitutive NOS in the absence of L-Arg depletion [6,30,35,36], but it does not exclude the potential therapeutic role of this amino acid in pathological conditions associated with the impairment of the L-Arg/NO pathway [37,38]. Our study is the first to show that different formulations of L-Arg exert opposing, pH-dependent, chronotropic responses in vitro. This highlights the importance of considering NO-independent effects when L-Arg is used to enhance NO synthesis or reverse NOS inhibition.

Time for primary review 33 days.


    Acknowledgements
 
We are grateful to the Garfield Weston Trust and the British Heart Foundation for their support. PM is a recipient of a Goodger Scholarship from the University of Oxford.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 5 Summary
 References
 

  1. Musialek P., Lei M., Brown H.F., Paterson D.J., Casadei B. Nitric oxide can increase heart rate by stimulating the hyperpolarization-activated inward current If. Circ Res (1997) 81:60–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pinsky D.J., Patton S., Mesaros S., et al. Mechanical transduction of nitric oxide synthesis in the beating heart. Circ Res (1997) 81:372–379.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Shesely E.G., Maeda N., Kim H.-S., et al. Elevated blood pressure in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1996) 93:13176–13181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kojda G., Laursen J.B., Ramasamy S., et al. Disruption of the eNOS gene causes hypersensitivity of mouse aorta to vasoconstrictors and glyceryl trinitrate (Abstract). Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol (1997) 355:R41.
  5. Kojda G., Kottenberg K., Noack E. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase and soluble guanylate cyclase induces cardiodepressive effects in normal rat hearts. Eur J Pharmacol (1997) 334:181–190.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. MacAllister R.J., Calver A.L., Collier J., et al. Vascular and hormonal responses to arginine: provision of substrate for nitric oxide or non-specific effect? Clin Sci (1995) 89:183–190.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Förstermann U., Closs E.I., Pollock J.S., et al. Nitric oxide synthase isozymes: Characterization, purification, molecular cloning, and functions. Hypertension (1994) 23:1121–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. McDonald K.K., Zharikov S., Block E.R., Kilberg M.S. A calveolar complex between the cationic amino acid transporter 1 and the endothelial nitric oxide synthase may explain the "arginine paradox". J Biol Chem (1997) 272:31213–31216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Palmer R.M.J., Rees D., Ashton D.S., Moncada S. L-Arginine is the physiological precursor for the formation of nitric oxide in the endothelium-dependent relaxation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1988) 153:1251–1256.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Gold M.E., Wood K.S., Buga G.M., Byrns R.E., Ignarro L.J. L-Arginine causes whereas L-argininosuccinic acid inhibits endothelium-dependent vascular smooth muscle relaxation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1989) 161:536–543.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Mendes Ribeiro A.C., Hassen H., Kiessling K., et al. Transport of L-arginine and the nitric oxide inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine in human erythrocytes in chronic renal failure. Clin Sci (1997) 93:57–64.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Eriksson L.E.G. Binding of nitric oxide to intact human erythrocytes as monitored by electron paramagnetic resonance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1994) 203:176–181.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Imig J.D., Gebremedhin D., Harder D.R., Roman R.J. Modulation of vascular tone in renal microcirculation by erythrocytes: role of EDRF. Am J Physiol (1993) 264:H190–195.[ISI][Medline]
  14. Hakim T.S., Sugimori K., Camporesi E.M., Anderson G. Half-life of nitric oxide in aqueous solutions with and without haemoglobin. Physiol Meas (1996) 17:267–277.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  15. Lefer A.M., Murohara T. Comparative pharmacology of nitric oxide and nitric oxide generators on cardiac contractility in mammalian species. Int J Cardiol (1995) 50:239–242.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  16. Mitchell J.A., de Nucci G., Warner T.D., Vane J.R. Alkaline buffers release EDRF from bovine cultured aortic endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol (1991) 103:1295–1302.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Kelly R.A., Balligand J.-L., Smith T.W. Nitric oxide and cardiac function. Circ Res (1996) 9:363–380.
  18. Shah A. Paracrine modulation of heart cell function by endothelial cells. Cardiovasc Res (1996) 31:847–867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Elvan A., Rubart M., Zipes D. NO modulates autonomic effects on sinus discharge rate and AV nodal conduction in open-chest dogs. Am J Physiol (1997) 272:H263–271.[ISI][Medline]
  20. Sears C.E., Choate J.K., Paterson D.J. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase slows heart rate recovery from cholinergic activation. J Appl Physiol (1998) 84:1596–1603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Sears C.E., Choate J.K., Paterson D.J. Effect of nitric oxide synthase inhibition on the sympatho–vagal control of heart rate. J Auton Nerv Syst (1998) 73:63–73.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  22. Pabla R., Curtis M. Effects of NO modulation on cardiac arrhythmias in the rat isolated heart. Circ Res (1995) 77:984–992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Beresewicz A., Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E., Lewartowski B., Cedro-Ceremuzynska K. A protective role of nitric oxide in isolated ischaemic/reperfused rat heart. Cardiovasc Res (1995) 30:1001–1008.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Parent R., Paré R., Lavallée M. Contribution of nitric oxide to dilation of resistance coronary vessels in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol (1992) 262:H10–H16.[ISI][Medline]
  25. Matsunaga T., Okumura K., Ishizaka H., Tsunoda R., Yasue H. Effect of cumulative doses of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester on coronary blood flow of anesthetized and conscious dogs. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther (1994) 327:251–265.[ISI][Medline]
  26. Melo L.G., Sonnenberg H. Effect of nitric oxide inhibition on secretion of atrial natriuretic factor in isolated rat heart. Am J Physiol (1996) 270:H306–311.[ISI][Medline]
  27. Izrailtyan I., Kresh J.Y. Bradykinin modulation of isolated rabbit heart function is mediated by intrinsic cardiac neurons. Cardiovasc Res (1997) 33:641–649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hoover D.B. Effects of substance P on rate and perfusion pressure in the isolated guinea pig heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (1990) 252:179–184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Palmer R.M.J., Ashton D.S., Moncada S. Vascular endothelial cells synthesize nitric oxide from L-arginine. Nature (1988) 333:664–666.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Simmons W.W., Closs E.I., Cunningham J.M., Smith T.W., Kelly R.A. Cytokines and insulin induce cationic amino acid transporter (CAT) expression in cardiac myocytes: Regulation of L-Arginine transport and NO production by CAT-1, CAT-2A, and CAT-2B. J Biol Chem (1996) 271:11694–11702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Koch-Weser J. Influence of osmolarity of perfusate on contractility of mammalian myocardium. Am J Physiol (1963) 204:957–962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gende O.A., Camilion De Huarto M.C. Chronotropic response to hyperosmotic solutions of isolated rat atria. Arch Intern Physiol Biochem (1987) 95:183–188.
  33. Gende O.A., Camilion de Hurtado M.C., Cingolani E.H. Chronotropic response of isolated atria to acid base alterations. Arch Intern Physiol Biochem (1978) 86:997–1009.[CrossRef]
  34. Satoh H., Seyama I. On the mechanism by which changes in extracellular pH affect the electrical activity of the rabbit sino–atrial node. J Physiol (Lond) (1986) 381:181–191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Rhodes P., Barr C.S., Struthers A.D. Arginine, lysine and ornithine as vasodilators in the forearm of man. Eur J Clin Invest (1996) 26:325–331.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  36. Balligand J.-L., Kelly R.A., Marsden P.A., Smith T.W., Michel T. Control of cardiac muscle cell function by an endogenous nitric oxide signalling system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1993) 90:347–351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Cooke J.P., Dzau V.J. Derangements of the nitric oxide synthase pathway L-arginine, and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation (1997) 96:379–382.[ISI][Medline]
  38. de Lorgeril M. Dietary arginine and the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovasc Res (1998) 37:560–563.[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Musialek, P.
Right arrow Articles by Casadei, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Musialek, P.
Right arrow Articles by Casadei, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?