© 1998 by European Society of Cardiology
Copyright © 1998, European Society of Cardiology
Comparison of the acute effects of a selective endothelin ETA and a mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonist in heart failure
First Department of Internal Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Tsukinowa, Seta, Otsu, Shiga 520-2192, Japan
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +81-77-548-2213; Fax: +81-77-543-5839; E-mail: wada@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp
Received 8 January 1998; accepted 17 May 1998
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: Both the selective endothelin (ET) ETA receptor and mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonists improve haemodynamics in patients and experimental models with congestive heart failure (CHF) and reduce the mortality in CHF rats. However, it remains unclear which of these antagonists is superior in the treatment of CHF. In addition, there is little information as to whether these ET receptor antagonists contribute to the neuroendocrine regulation and body fluid balance. We therefore investigated the cardiorenal and neurohumoral benefits of selective ETA receptor and mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonists in CHF. Methods: We administered acutely either the selective ETA receptor antagonist FR139317 (FR, n=6, 1 and 10 mg/kg) or the mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonist TAK-044 (TAK, n=6, 1 and 3 mg/kg) to conscious dogs with CHF induced by rapid right ventricular pacing for ten days. Results: Both FR and TAK decreased the cardiac pressures and the plasma atrial natriuretic peptide level and increased the cardiac output and urinary sodium excretion. FR increased the urine flow rate in association with an increased glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow, while TAK reduced the plasma aldosterone level. Neither antagonist increased the plasma renin activity or norepinephrine levels. Conclusions: These findings suggest that a selective ETA receptor antagonist has more beneficial acute effects on renal functions in CHF than a mixed ETA/ETB antagonist. However, the long-term administration of a mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonist would improve not only the haemodynamics but also prevent fluid retention by suppressing secretion of aldosterone during the treatment of chronic CHF.
KEYWORDS Heart failure; Endothelin; Antagonists; Neurohumoral factors; Dog
| 1 Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelin (ET)-1, an endothelium-derived peptide [1], can bind to two ET receptors, ETA and ETB [2]. In vascular beds, ETA receptors in vascular smooth muscle cells mediate vasoconstriction, while ETB receptors mediate not only vasodilation through the release of nitric oxide and prostacyclin in endothelial cells [3]but also vasoconstriction in vascular smooth muscle [4]. Therefore, endogenous ET-1 may be involved in the complicated modulation of vascular tone through the activity of each receptor.
ET-1 can cause not only potent and prolonged vasoconstriction but also sodium retention and activation of cathecholamine, angiotensin II (AT II) and aldosterone secretion [1, 5, 6]. Congestive heart failure (CHF) is characterized by vasoconstriction, volume retention and the activation of such neurohumoral factors as the sympathetic nervous system and the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). Therefore, ET-1 may interact with other vasoactive factors that are known to be activated in CHF and play an important role in the pathogenesis of CHF. Indeed, ET-1 circulates in the plasma, and the plasma ET-1 level has been shown to increase in patients [7, 8]as well as in several animal models with CHF [9, 10]. Both selective ETA and mixed ETA/ETB antagonists improved not only the haemodynamics but also the survival rate in CHF rats [11, 12]. However, since there is little information as to whether these ET receptor antagonists contribute to regulation of the release of neurohumoral factors and to body fluid balance in CHF, it is still not clear which of these ET receptor antagonists has a more beneficial value for the treatment of CHF.
The identification of neuroendocrine activation has important therapeutic implications because a treatment designed to inhibit neurohumoral excitation may prevent the development of CHF. The V-HeFT II study has shown that the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, enalapril, improved mortality compared with non-specific vasodilators by suppressing the progressive activation of the RAAS and the sympathetic nervous system [13]. Therefore, for the treatment of CHF, we should evaluate the effects of the ET receptor antagonists not only on haemodynamics but also on the neurohumoral and body fluid balance, and examine the overall pathophysiological effects of endogenous ETs.
In the present study, we investigated the cardiorenal and neurohormonal effects of FR139317, a selective ETA receptor antagonist, and TAK-044, a mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonist, in conscious dogs with CHF induced by rapid right ventricular pacing, and assessed the therapeutic benefits of these ET receptor antagonists for CHF. Elucidation of ET receptor antagonists will open up a new avenue, leading to new strategies in the management of CHF.
| 2 Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was approved by the Animal Research Committee of Shiga University of Medical Science and conforms with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985).
2.1 Animal preparation
Experiments were carried out in conditioned beagles of either sex (10–13 kg). All surgery to implant the cardiac pacemaker leads and intravascular catheters was performed as reported previously [14]. Briefly, the heart was exposed through a left thoracotomy incision at the fourth intercostal space. The pericardium was opened, and two cardiac unipolar pacemaker leads (M-23, Matsuda) were sutured onto the right ventricular apex. A thermodilution catheter (7 Fr.; model T-047-03, Goodtec) was advanced into the pulmonary artery via the left femoral vein for the measurement of right atrial pressure (RAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and cardiac output (CO). CO was assessed in triplicate by the thermodilution technique with 5 ml of ice-cold 0.9% saline injected into the right atrium, and the subsequent thermodilution curves were integrated by a Gould cardiac output computer (SP1435, Statham). The variation of measurement in triplicate was within 5%. A Tygon catheter (flexible plastic tubing; Norton) was placed in the descending thoracic aorta via the right common carotid artery for measurement of the mean arterial pressure (MAP). The other Tygon tube was advanced into the vena cava via the right jugular vein for drug administration. The pacemaker (model 540, Seamed) and the ends of the catheters and pacing wires were securely fastened in a small bag worn on the back of the animal. The dogs were allowed to recover from surgery for at least 14 days before control study measurements were made. After control haemodynamic and plasma samples for neurohumoral determinations were obtained, rapid right ventricular pacing (270 beats/min) was started and continued for ten days. All subsequent studies were performed with animals in the conscious state.
2.2 Drugs
FR139317 (FR), a highly selective ETA receptor antagonist, which has an 8868-fold higher selective affinity for the ETA receptor than for the ETB receptor in the porcine aorta and kidney membrane [15], was a kind present from Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tsukuba, Japan).
TAK-044 (TAK), which is often described as a nonselective ET receptor antagonist [16, 17], was generously supplied by Takeda Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). Although TAK has a 244-fold higher selectivity for the ETA receptor than for the ETB receptor in in vitro human ventricle tissue [18], TAK inhibited both ETA- and ETB- mediated blood pressure responses induced by exogenous ET-1 and also inhibited the S6c (ETB agonist)-induced ETB-mediated vasoconstriction and pressor responses in rats [16].
2.3 Experimental protocol
2.3.1 Study 1. Inhibitory effects of FR and TAK on exogenous ET-1
To confirm the in vivo effects of FR and TAK as selective ETA and mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonists, respectively, in dogs, we observed the inhibitory effects of these antagonists on the response of MAP to exogenously administered human ET-1 (Peptide Institute, Japan). After the haemodynamic status had stabilized, ET-1 (0.75 nmol/kg, n=4) was injected as a bolus, FR (1 mg/kg, n=4) or TAK (1 mg/kg, n=4) intravenously 5 min prior to ET-1 injection, and the change in MAP was recorded for 30 min in each group.
2.3.2 Study 2. Cardiorenal and hormonal effects of FR and TAK in dogs with CHF
To evaluate the cardiorenal and neurohumoral effects of selective ETA and mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonists in CHF, we divided the dogs into three groups; the FR group (n=6) was given FR, the TAK group (n=6) was given TAK and the vehicle group (n=5) received only saline as a control. All subsequent measurements were recorded with ongoing rapid ventricular pacing. As previously reported [14], the urinary bladder was catheterized for urine collection and creatinine (CRE) and p-aminohippurate (PAH) were infused, to calculate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF). After a 60-min equilibration period, the first of two clearance periods was performed, each of which was 20 min in duration. After stable basal haemodynamic records were obtained, in the FR group, the first bolus dose of FR at 1 mg/kg was administered intravenously. After 30 min, the second dose of 10 mg/kg was injected, and a 30-min clearance was performed for each dose. In the TAK group, TAK was administered at 1 and 3 mg/kg at intervals of 30 min in the same way. We decided to observe the dose responsive effects using two incremental doses because a higher dose of each agent was expected to exert more favorable effects. Consequently, a three-fold higher dose (3 mg/kg) was selected. However, in the preliminary study, 3 mg/kg FR did not induce any further depressor effects on MAP compared with 1 mg/kg (by 10.5 and 10.9%, respectively, n=4, P=0.86). Therefore, we examined the administration of 1 and 10 mg/kg on the response to FR in the present study. In the vehicle group, saline was administered at intervals of 30 min, to exclude any temporal effects. During each clearance period, the cardiac pressure measurements were recorded every 5 min. Pressure data regarding MAP, RAP, MPAP and PCWP were collected. CO was determined at the end of each period. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were calculated as follows: SVR; (MAP–RAP)/COx80, PVR; (MPAP–PCWP)/COx80. Blood was drawn from the pulmonary artery through the indwelling thermodilution catheter at the end of each period and transferred to specially prepared tubes that were stored on ice, to analyze plasma ET-1, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentrations, plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma aldosterone and norepinephrine. Blood for analysis of plasma CRE, PAH and sodium were drawn at the midpoint of each clearance period. An equal volume of saline was injected to replace the volume lost by blood withdrawal. After the injection of antagonist, two additional 30-min urine collections were made.
2.4 Analysis of blood and urine samples
PRA and ET-1, ANP and aldosterone levels in the sampled blood were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) as previously described [14, 19, 20]. Plasma norepinephrine levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Serum and urine CRE, PAH and sodium concentrations were measured as previously reported [14]. CRE clearance and PAH clearance were calculated using standard formulas, and were equated with the GFR and RPF, respectively.
2.5 Statistical analysis
All data are presented as mean values±standard error of the mean (SE). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements was used to determine the significance of changes during multiple time-dependent observations. Comparisons with the baseline values were performed by the Scheffe's test following ANOVA for repeated measurements. The Student's t-test was used to analyze the significance of single comparisons. Differences at a P value <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
| 3 Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.1 Blocking effects of FR and TAK on ET-1 injection
As shown in Fig. 1, ET-1 produced an initial transient reduction in MAP followed by a sustained increase in MAP that was maximal within 15 min of injection. Pretreatment with FR did not affect the initial hypotension, but significantly blocked ET-1-induced hypertension for about 30 min after ET-1 injection compared with ET-1 administration alone. On the other hand, TAK significantly inhibited both the initial transient depressor and the following pressor response to ET-1 compared with ET-1 injection alone. TAK suppressed the maximal sustained elevation in MAP (from 15 to 30 min) as much as FR.
|
3.2 Characteristics of CHF
The baseline haemodynamic, neurohumoral and renal functional characteristics of CHF induced by rapid ventricular pacing are summarized in Table 1. In the FR, TAK and vehicle groups, PCWP and RAP were significantly increased, but MAP and CO were decreased relative to the respective baseline values. The plasma ET-1, norepinephrine, and aldosterone levels and PRA were significantly increased to several times the baseline level. The plasma ANP concentration increased around seven-fold compared with those in the normal controls. Urine and urinary sodium excretion decreased after pacing. In addition to the deteriorated haemodynamics and activated neurohumoral secretion, all dogs were judged to be in CHF, based on evidence of anorexia and mild ascites and signs of exertional dyspnea. When the haemodynamic and neurohumoral baseline data of all of the experimental animals were pooled, the differences among the three groups were not significant.
|
3.3 Haemodynamic effects of FR and TAK in dogs with CHF
The haemodynamic responses to the two incremental doses of FR or TAK are shown in Fig. 2A–F. We measured the haemodynamic changes on a fixed heart rate with ongoing rapid ventricular pacing. Both FR and TAK significantly increased CO and decreased MAP and PCWP in association with significant reductions in SVR and PVR. Neither FR nor TAK caused significant changes in RAP. None of these haemodynamic variables changed significantly in the vehicle group.
|
3.4 Neurohumoral effects of FR and TAK in dogs with CHF
The neurohumoral responses to FR and TAK are shown in Fig. 3A–E. Although neither antagonist altered the PRA, only TAK significantly decreased the plasma aldosterone levels. FR and TAK tended to increase the plasma norepinephrine levels, but these changes were not significant. Both FR and TAK significantly decreased the plasma ANP levels. TAK, but not FR, significantly increased the concentration of ET-1. The control saline injection did not affect these hormonal parameters.
|
3.5 Renal effects of FR and TAK in dogs with CHF
The effects of FR and TAK on renal functions are shown in Table 2. Only FR significantly increased the urine flow rate and RPF, while TAK affected neither. FR and TAK significantly increased GFR and the urinary sodium excretion rate compared to the average basal values.
|
| 4 Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This is the first report, to our knowledge, comparing the acute effects of an ETA and a mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonist in CHF. Both ET receptor antagonists improved the haemodynamics and sodium retention without further activation of the sympathetic nervous system or the RAAS. While only FR increased urine output, TAK reduced the plasma aldosterone level.
4.1 Characteristics of FR and TAK in dogs in vivo
In study 1, exogenous ET-1 produced the initial depressor response, which was mediated by ETB receptors via the release of relaxing factors from the vascular endothelium [3], and the subsequent pressor response, which is primarily mediated by ETA receptors. Pretreatment with FR (1 mg/kg) inhibited the only sustained increase in MAP, indicating that FR is a selective ETA receptor antagonist in dogs in vivo and that FR, at a dose of 1 mg/kg, exerts a sufficient ETA receptor antagonistic activity. On the other hand, TAK (1 mg/kg) significantly inhibited both the ET-1-induced initial transient hypotension and the following hypertension. Although TAK has a higher selectivity for the ETA receptor in vitro [16, 18], TAK at a dose of 1 mg/kg functions as a sufficient ETA and ETB receptor antagonist in dogs in vivo. Moreover, FR and TAK, at doses of 1 mg/kg, almost equally suppressed the sustained elevation in MAP from 10 to 30 min, suggesting that FR and TAK may have similar ETA receptor antagonistic activities at a dose of 1 mg/kg.
4.2 Changes in haemodynamics
Using a canine model of CHF, induced by intracoronary microembolization, Shimoyama et al. [10]showed that a mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonist, bosentan, increased CO through an effect on SVR and, while it induced a small decrease in MAP, this change was not significant. In the present study, no haemodynamic differences were apparent between the selective and mixed ET receptor antagonists, indicating that overall endogenous ETs act predominantly as vasoconstrictors (via ETA and constrictive ETB receptors) and play an important role in the maintenance of the haemodynamics in CHF. However, we recently demonstrated that a selective ETB antagonist, RES-701-1, increased MAP, SVR and PVR and reduced CO in dogs with CHF [19]. Therefore, vasodilative ETB receptors on the endothelium greatly contribute to the regulation of blood pressure in CHF, and the blockade of vasodilative ETB receptors may be harmful in the treatment of CHF. We suppose that a selective ETA receptor antagonist may have the advantage of maintaining ETB receptor-mediated vasodilatation in the treatment of CHF. If possible, the specific antagonism of both ETA and constrictive ETB receptors may be the most beneficial.
4.3 Changes in plasma hormones
The identification of neurohumoral alternations is important because the treatment of CHF should be designed to inhibit vasoconstrictive neuroendocrine excitation as ventricular dysfunction progresses and develops into CHF.
In theory, with a fall in blood pressure, the sympathetic nervous system can be stimulated [21]. However, neither FR nor TAK caused a significant increase in the plasma norepinephrine levels in this study. Both FR and TAK may have the potential to suppress the release of norepinephrine, because an ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123, inhibited ET-1-induced norepinephrine secretion in the canine adrenal gland in vivo [22].
In the present study, neither FR nor TAK caused a significant change in PRA. Although ET-1 has been demonstrated to have an inhibitory effect on renin release in vitro [23], there have been conflicting findings in vivo where ET-1 both decreased and increased PRA in dogs with CHF [6, 24]. However, we do not believe that ET-1 is primarily concerned with the release of renin. The macula densa mechanism and renal baroreflex are major stimuli for renin release [25]. The increased urinary sodium excretion by both FR and TAK may suppress renin release. As the arterial blood pressure was decreased by FR and TAK, the renal perfusion pressure might also be decreased and, consequently, the reduced renal perfusion pressure might stimulate renin release. These modulators of renin release might counteract each other and, thereby, the PRA did not significantly change after administration of FR and TAK.
However, TAK, but not FR, significantly suppressed the concentration of plasma aldosterone, despite no significant decline in PRA. Neither TAK nor FR altered the plasma AT-II and potassium levels throughout the experiment (data not shown). As for the secretion of aldosterone, ET-1 may be significantly involved through ETB receptors, but not via the renin angiotensin axis or plasma potassium level. Indeed, a specific ETB, but not an ETA, receptor antagonist, BQ-788, decreased the ET-1-stimulated output of aldosterone by zona glomerulosa cells in rats [26]. Moreover, we recently demonstrated that a selective ETB antagonist, RES-701-1, reduced the plasma aldosterone level in the same canine model of CHF [19]. For the long-term treatment of CHF, the chronic administration of a mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonist would prevent volume retention by suppressing the secretion of aldosterone.
We have previously reported that endogenous ANP inhibited the secretion of ET-1 through a cGMP pathway in dogs with CHF [22], while ET-1 stimulates to release ANP [5, 27]. It is important to clarify the relationship between ET-1 and ANP because both peptides counteract each other in CHF. An ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123, inhibited ET-stimulated ANP secretion in rat atrial myocytes and an ETB antagonist, RES-701-1, did not affect the plasma ANP level in dogs with CHF [19]. Endogenous ET may mediate ANP secretion through the ETA receptor in dogs with CHF. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the reduction in ANP with FR and TAK may reflect haemodynamic improvement expressed as a lowering PCWP. In any case, the decrease in ANP levels with both FR and TAK may suggest that antagonism with ETA receptors, but not ETB receptors, can attenuate the exacerbation of CHF because ANP is secreted in proportion to severity of CHF and is a marker for the prognosis of patients with CHF [28].
FR did not affect ET-1 concentrations in the plasma. In contrast, TAK significantly increased the plasma ET-1 levels in a dose-related manner. We and other investigators have demonstrated that the selective blockade of ETB receptors, but not of ETA receptors, increases the plasma ET-1 level [10, 12, 19], suggesting that ETB receptors appear to mediate the clearance of ET-1. Changes in the circulating ET-1 concentrations would be useful to show a significant difference between these two ET receptor antagonists.
4.4 Changes in renal functions
ET-1 enhances water conservation mainly via ETA receptors, by glomerular vasoconstriction [29]. In contrast, ET-1 impedes water conservation via ETB receptors by blunting arginine vasopressin-mediated water reabsorption [29, 30]and by producing prostaglandin E2 [30]in rats. In addition, ETB receptor activation results in diuresis, but does not alter sodium excretion in dogs [31]. A selective ETA antagonist (FR) might attenuate renal vascular contraction and increase RPF and GFR. Thus, FR induced the increase in urine and sodium excretion due to the increased GFR and RPF. On the other hand, a selective ETB antagonist reduced RPF and tended to decrease GFR and urinary sodium and water excretion in dogs with CHF [19]. Therefore, it is possible that TAK, a mixed ETA and ETB receptor antagonist, did not alter urine output or RPF and caused only a small increase in GFR and urinary sodium excretion by cancelling one effect mediated by the ETA receptor and the other mediated by the ETB receptor. The roles of endogenous ETs in renal sodium and water handling mediated by ETA and ETB receptors seem to be very complex, and further investigation is required.
Only FR has a beneficial acute diuretic effect, suggesting that the acute administration of a selective ETA receptor antagonist is more advantageous to renal functions than that of a mixed ETA/ETB antagonist. However, the CONSENSUS I trial [32]and the SOLVD trial [33]have shown that ACE inhibitors, which have little effect on diuresis in CHF [34], improve mortality and morbidity in chronic CHF, indicating that management of neurohumoral factors, but not of urination, is the most important factor in the chronic treatment of CHF. Since the characteristics of ET receptor antagonists are fairly similar to those of ACE inhibitors, both selective ETA and mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonists have great possibilities as therapeutic agents for chronic CHF.
4.5 Study limitations
It is possible that the selective ETA receptor antagonist's (FR) blocking effects mediated by the ETA receptors might simultaneously augment the effects mediated by the ETB receptors. In addition, although TAK had an antagonistic activity against both vasodilative and constrictive ETB receptors as well as ETA receptors, it remains unclear how much of each ETB receptor (vasodilative and constrictive) is concerned with the regulation of blood pressure and we could not quantitatively distinguish the haemodynamic effect mediated by these ET receptors (ETA receptor and both ETB receptors) on one another.
We could not also exclude the possibility of interaction between haemodynamic and hormonal effects because of systemic administration of antagonists. Although the heart rate was fixed with ongoing rapid pacing, the vascular responses to any vasoconstrictor or drug may be modified by cardiovascular reflex responses, including arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflexes or changes in the circulating levels of hormones that affect the cardiovascular system.
4.6 Conclusions
Without activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the RAAS, despite a reduction in blood pressure, both FR and TAK improved the haemodynamics, significantly reduced the plasma ANP level and increased the excretion of sodium in dogs with CHF. While only FR increased the urine output, TAK reduced the plasma aldosterone level. These findings suggest that a selective ETA receptor antagonist has more beneficial acute effects on renal functions than a mixed ETA/ETB antagonist. However, as CHF is a chronic disease, assessment of long-term treatment with those agents is required. The chronic administration of a mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonist may prevent volume retention by suppressing the secretion of aldosterone. Our complementary results would be helpful to understand the pathophysiological roles of ET-1 and have important therapeutic implications.
Time for primary review 25 days.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
We would like to thank Ikuko Sakaguchi for her invaluable technical assistance. This study was supported by a grant from Special Project for the Promotion of Education from Shiga University of Medical Science, by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (B) 08457206 and a grant-in-aid for Encouragement of Young Scientists (C) 09770481 from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sport, and Culture of Japan.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, et al. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature (1988) 332:441–445.[CrossRef]
- Arai H, Hori S, Aramori I, Ohkubo H, Nakanishi S. Cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding an endothelin receptor. Nature (1990) 348:730–732.[CrossRef][Medline]
- DeNucci G, Thomas R, D'Orleans-Juste P, et al. Pressor effects of circulating endothelin are limited by its removal in the pulmonary circulation and by the release of prostacyclin and endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1988) 85:9797–9800.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Summer M.J, Cannon T.R, Mundin J.W, White D.G, Watts I.S. Endothelin ETA and ETB receptors mediate vascular smooth muscle contraction. Br J Pharmacol (1992) 107:858–860.[ISI][Medline]
- Goetz K.L, Wang B.C, Madwed J.B, Zhu J.L, Leadley R.J Jr. Cardiovascular, renal and endocrine response to intravenous endothelin in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol (1988) 255:R1064–R1068.[ISI][Medline]
- Miller W.L, Redfield M.N, Burnett J.C Jr. Integrated cardiac, renal, and endocrine actions of endothelin. J Clin Invest (1989) 83:317–320.[ISI][Medline]
- Cody R.J, Haas G.J, Binkley P.F, Capers Q, Kelly R. Plasma endothelin correlates with the extent of pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Circulation (1992) 85:504–509.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Maeda Y, Adachi T, Kinoshita M. Relation between endothelin-1 spillover in the lungs and the pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol (1994) 23:1427–1433.[Abstract]
- Margulies K.B, Hildebrand F.L Jr., Lerman A, Perrella M.A, Burnett J.C Jr. Increased endothelin in experimental heart failure. Circulation (1990) 82:2226–2230.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Shimoyama H, Sabbah H.N, Borzak S, et al. Short-term hemodynamic effects of endothelin receptor blockade in dogs with chronic heart failure. Circulation (1996) 94:779–784.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Sakai S, Miyauchi T, Kobayashi M, et al. Inhibition of myocardial endothelin pathway improves long-term survival in heart failure. Nature (1996) 384:353–355.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Mulder P, Richard V, Derumeaux G, et al. Role of endogenous endothelin in chronic heart failure. Effect of long-term treatment with an endothelin antagonist on survival, hemodynamics, and cardiac remodeling. Circulation (1997) 96:1976–1982.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cohn J.N, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. A comparison of enalapril with hydralazine–isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med (1991) 325:303–310.[Abstract]
- Wada A, Maeda Y, Matsuda Y, Kinoshita M. Cardiorenal and neurohumoral effects of endogenous atrial natriuretic peptides in dogs with severe congestive heart failure using a specific antagonist for guanylate cyclase coupled receptor. Circulation (1994) 89:2232–2240.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Sogabe K, Nirei H, Shoubo M, et al. Pharmacological profile of FR139317, a novel, potent endothelin ETA receptor antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (1992) 264:1040–1046.[ISI]
- Ikeda S, Awane Y, Kusumoto K, et al. A new endothelin receptor antagonist, TAK-044, shows long-lasting inhibition of both ETA- and ETB-mediated blood pressure responses in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (1994) 270:728–733.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hendry B.M, James A.F. Endothelin antagonists in renal disease. Lancet (1997) 350:381–382.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Plumpton C, Ferro C.J, Haynes W.G, Webb D.J, Davenport A.P. The increase in human plasma immunoreactive endothelin but not big endothelin-1 or its C-terminal fragment induced by systemic administration of the endothelin antagonist TAK-044. Br J Pharmacol (1996) 119:311–314.[ISI][Medline]
- Wada A, Tsutamoto T, Fukai D, et al. Comparison of the effects of selective ETA and ETB receptor antagonists in congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol (1997) 30:1385–1392.[Abstract]
- Wada A, Tsutamoto T, Maeda Y, et al. Endogenous atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits endothelin-1 secretion in dogs with severe congestive heart failure. Am J Physiol (1995) 270:H1819–H1824.
- Bayliss J, Norell M.S, Canepa-anson R, et al. Clinical importance of the renin–angiotensin system in chronic heart failure: double blind comparison of captopril and prazosin. Br Med J (1985) 290:1861–1865.[ISI][Medline]
- Yamaguchi N. Role of ETA and ETB receptors in endothelin-1-induced adrenal catecholamine secretion in vivo. Am J Physiol (1997) 272:R1290–R1297.[ISI][Medline]
- Takagi Y, Matsuoka H, Atarashi K, Yagi S. Endothelin: a new inhibitor of renin release. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1988) 157:1164–1168.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Cavero P.G, Miller W.L, Heublein D.M, Margulies K.B, Burnett J.C Jr. Endothelin in experimental congestive heart failure in anaesthetized dog. Am J Physiol (1990) 259:F312–F317.[ISI][Medline]
- Davis J.O, Freeman R.H. Mechanism regulating renin release. Physiol Rev (1976) 56:1–56.
[Free Full Text] - Belloni A.S, Rossi G.P, Andreis P.G, et al. Endothelin adrenocortical secretagogue effect is mediated by the B receptor in rats. Hypertension (1996) 27:1153–1159.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Fukuda Y, Hirata Y, Toshimi H, et al. Endothelin is a potent secretagogue for atrial natriuretic peptide in cultured rat atrial myocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1988) 155:167–172.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Maeda K, et al. Attenuation of compensation of endogenous cardiac natriuretic peptide system in chronic heart failure: Prognostic role of plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration in patients with chronic symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation (1997) 96:509–516.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Karet F, Davenport A. The endothelin system in the kidney. Nephrology (1996) 2:73–85.[CrossRef]
- Kohan D.E, Padilla E, Hughes A.K. Endothelin B receptor mediates ET-1 effects on cAMP and PGE2 accumulation in rat IMCD. Am J Physiol (1993) 265:F670–F676.[ISI][Medline]
- Clavell A.L, Stingo A.J, Margulies K.B, Brandt R.R, Burnett J.C Jr. Role of endothelin receptor subtypes in the in vivo regulation of renal function. Am J Physiol (1995) 268:F455–F460.[ISI][Medline]
- The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: Results of the cooperative north Scandinavian enalapril survival study (CONSENSUS) N Engl J Med 1987;316:1429–1435.
- The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991;325:293–302.
- Bayliss J, Norell M, Canepa-Anson R, Poole-Wilson P.A, Sutton G.C. Renal vascular response to neuroendocrine vasodilatation in chronic heart failure. Br Heart J (1984) 53:107.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

P<0.01, #P<0.001 compared with values in the vehicle group.
