Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1998 38(3):631-645; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(98)00050-9
© 1998 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krombach, R.S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinale, F. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krombach, R.S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinale, F. G
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1998, European Society of Cardiology

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, AT1 receptor inhibition, and combination therapy with pacing induced heart failure: effects on left ventricular performance and regional blood flow patterns

R.Stephen Krombacha, Mark J Claira, Jennifer W Hendricka, Ward V Houcka, James L Zellnera, Scott B Kribbsa, Steve Whitebreadb, Rupak Mukherjeea, Marc de Gasparob and Francis G Spinalea,*

aDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
bPharmaceutical Division, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 (803) 792-2011; Fax: +1 (803) 792-8286.

Received 3 September 1997; revised 8 January 1998; accepted 30 January 1998


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
Background: AT1 receptor activation has been demonstrated to cause increased vascular resistance properties which may be of particular importance in the setting of congestive heart failure (CHF). The overall goal of this study was to examine the effects of ACE inhibition (ACEI) alone, AT1 receptor blockade alone and combined ACEI and AT1 receptor blockade on LV pump function, systemic hemodynamics and regional blood flow patterns in the normal state and with the development of pacing induced CHF, both at rest and with treadmill induced exercise. Methods and results: Pigs (25 kg) were instrumented in order to measure cardiac output (CO), systemic (SVR) and pulmonary vascular (PVR) resistance, neurohormonal system activity, and myocardial blood flow distribution in the conscious state and assigned to one of 4 groups: (1) rapid atrial pacing (240 bpm) for 3 weeks (n=7); (2) ACEI (benazeprilat, 3.75 mg/day) and pacing (n=7); (3) AT1 receptor blockade (valsartan, 60 mg/day) and rapid pacing (n=7); and (4) ACEI and AT1 receptor blockade (benazeprilat/valsartan, 1/60 mg/day, respectively) and pacing (n=7). Measurements were obtained at rest and with treadmill exercise (15°, 3 miles/h; 10 min) in the normal control state and after the completion of the treatment protocols. With rapid pacing, CO was reduced at rest and with exercise compared to controls. ACEI or AT1 blockade normalized CO at rest, but remained lower than control values with exercise. Combination therapy normalized CO both at rest and with exercise. Resting SVR in the CHF group was higher than controls and SVR fell to a similar degree with exercise; all treatment groups reduced resting SVR. With exercise, SVR was reduced from rapid pacing values in the ACEI and combination therapy groups. PVR increased by over 4-fold in the rapid pacing group both at rest and with exercise, and was reduced in all treatment groups. In the combination therapy group, PVR was similar to control values with exercise. Plasma catecholamines and endothelin levels were increased by over 3-fold with chronic rapid pacing, and were reduced in all treatment groups. In the combination therapy group, the relative increase in catecholamines and endothelin with exercise were significantly blunted when compared to rapid pacing only values. LV myocardial blood flow at rest was reduced in the rapid pacing only and monotherapy groups, but was normalized with combination therapy. Conclusion: These findings suggest that with developing CHF, combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade improved vascular resistive properties and regional blood flow distribution to a greater degree than that of either treatment alone. Thus, combined ACEI and AT1 receptor blockade may provide unique benefits in the setting of CHF.

KEYWORDS Cardiac output; Myocardial blood flow; Pig; Neurohormone


    1 Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
Functional characteristics of severe congestive heart failure (CHF) include left ventricular (LV) pump dysfunction, alterations in systemic hemodynamics, increased neurohormonal system activation, and exercise intolerance [1–7]. With the development of CHF, increased production of angiotensin II (Ang-II) occurs with resultant activation of the AT1 receptor system [2, 6, 8, 9]. Abundant AT1 receptors have been located within a number of vascular beds including the pulmonary and coronary vasculature and activation of this receptor pathway causes vascular smooth muscle vasoconstriction [9–15]. Thus, heightened AT1 receptor activation with CHF will cause increased vascular resistive properties which in turn may exacerbate the LV pump dysfunction and hemodynamic instability which occur with the development of this disease process. Past clinical studies have clearly demonstrated that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition improves LV function and survival in the setting of CHF [16–18]. ACE inhibition has been demonstrated to produce multiple effects within the vascular system, which include prevention of Ang-II formation, potentiation of bradykinin levels, and modulation of nitric oxide production [14, 19–24]. Past studies have demonstrated that combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade may influence vascular resistive properties to a greater extent than either treatment alone [25, 26]. Whether and to what degree specific interruption of AT1 receptor activity, as well as combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade influence systemic hemodynamics and regional blood flow patterns in the setting of CHF remains unclear. Accordingly, the overall goal of this project was to determine the effects of ACE inhibition, AT1 receptor blockade, or combination therapy on LV function, hemodynamics and regional blood flow patterns in the normal state and following the development of CHF; both at rest and with treadmill induced exercise.

Past reports from this laboratory and others have demonstrated that chronic pacing tachycardia in animals causes progressive and time dependent changes in LV geometry and pump function, and neurohormonal system activation [26–34]. While the stimulus which induces CHF in this model is dissimilar to clinical etiologies of CHF, the functional and neurohormonal changes which occur with chronic rapid pacing are similar to the clinical spectrum of this disease process [2–6, 26, 33, 34]. In this model of CHF, the increased neurohormonal system activity is paralleled by increased systemic, pulmonary and coronary vascular resistance [11, 26–28, 30]. For example within the coronary vasculature, the development of pacing induced CHF is associated with diminished myocardial blood flow reserve [30]. Moreover, this model has been successfully used in order to determine the effects of exercise with the development of CHF [31]. Accordingly, in the present study, this model of pacing induced CHF was employed in order to examine the potentially differential effects of ACE inhibition, AT1 receptor blockade, and combined treatment on systemic hemodynamics and regional blood flow patterns both at rest and with treadmill induced exercise.


    2 Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
2.1 Model of CHF and exercise
The present study employed a rapid pacing model of CHF in pigs which has been well described by this laboratory previously [26, 30, 32]. Twenty-eight Yorkshire pigs (25 kg, male) were chronically instrumented in order to measure hemodynamics and LV pump function in the conscious state. The pigs were anesthetized with isoflurane (3%/1.5 l/min) and a mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen (50:50), intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube and ventilated at a flow rate of 22 ml/kg/min and a respiratory rate of 15/min. While maintaining a sterile field, the thoracic aorta was exposed through a left thoracotomy and a catheter connected to a vascular access port (Model GPV, 9F, Access Technologies, Skokie, IL) advanced into the aorta and sutured in place. Catheters were placed in the pulmonary artery and the left atrium in a similar fashion. The access ports were then placed in a subcutaneous pocket. A 20-mm flow probe (Transonics, Ithaca, NY) was placed around the pulmonary artery immediately distal to the pulmonary artery catheter and the electrical connection exteriorized through the thoracolumbar fascia. A shielded stimulating electrode was sutured onto the left atrium, connected to a modified programmable pacemaker (8329, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and buried in a subcutaneous pocket. The thoracotomy was closed in layers and the pleural space evacuated of air. All animals were treated and cared for in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, Washington, 1996).

Following a 14–21 day recovery from the surgical procedure, the animals were then returned to the laboratory for baseline studies as described in the following section. Following measurements under normal resting conditions and with exercise, the pigs were then randomly assigned to the following 4 treatment groups: (1) rapid atrial pacing (240 bpm) for 3 weeks (n=7); (2) concomitant ACE inhibition (benazeprilat, Novartis, Basle, 3.75 mg/day) and rapid pacing (n=7); (3) concomitant AT1 receptor blockade [35](valsartan, Novartis, Basel 60 mg/day) and rapid pacing (n=7); and (4) concomitant ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade (benazeprilat/valsartan, 1/60 mg/day, respectively) and rapid pacing (n=7). The drug treatment protocols were begun at the initiation of pacing and continued for the entire 21-day pacing protocol. To maintain a constant steady-state blood level of all compounds used in this study, osmotic minipumps (2ML1, Alza Corp) were implanted in the peritoneal cavity [26]. This study employed a dosing strategy for ACE inhibition, AT1 receptor blockade, and combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade which has been demonstrated previously to obtain approximately a 50% inhibition of the Ang-I and Ang-II pressor response, but would not produce significant differential effects on resting blood pressure [26]. Cardiac auscultation and an electrocardiogram were performed frequently during the pacing protocol in order to ensure proper operation of the pacemaker and the presence of 1:1 conduction.

2.1.1 Measurements at rest and with exercise
On the day of the study, the animals were sedated with diazepam (20 mg, p.o., Valium, Hoffmann–La Roche, Nutley, NJ) and placed in a custom designed sling which allowed the animal to rest comfortably. This laboratory has demonstrated previously that sedation with benzodiapines produced no significant effect on resting hemodynamics [36]. All studies were performed in the conscious state without additional use of sedation. An ECG was established, and the pacemaker deactivated (pacing groups only). After a 30-min stabilization period, LV function was measured by two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiographic studies (ATL Ultramark VI, 2.25-MHz transducer, Bothell, WA) [30]. The vascular access ports were entered using a 12-gauge Huber needle (Access Technologies, Skokie, IL), the flow probe was connected, and basal hemodynamics were recorded. The flow probe was connected to a digital flow-meter (T106, Transonics, Ithica, NY) as well as digitized to a computer for processing. From the digitized flow signal, stroke volume was computed on a beat-to-beat basis and averaged from a minimum of 25 ejections. Pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances were computed as the mean pressure divided by cardiac output multiplied by the constant 80 in order to convert to resistance units of dynes s cm–5. From the arterial catheter, 30 ml of blood was drawn into chilled tubes containing EDTA (1.5 mg/ml), and centrifuged (2000xg, 10 min, 4°C). The plasma was placed in separate tubes, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C for subsequent measurements of neurohormonal profiles, or valsartan levels. Samples were also drawn from the pulmonary artery and atrial catheters and immediately measured for oxygen saturation and hemoglobin content (CO-Oximeter, Instruments Laboratory, Lawrence, MA). Oxygen content was calculated as the product of hemoglobin concentration and oxygen saturation which was then multiplied by the constant 1.34 in order to obtain oxygen values in ml O2/dl. Systemic oxygen consumption (VO2) was computed as the difference in arterial and pulmonary artery oxygen content multiplied by cardiac output.

Following collection of the hemodynamic data and blood samples, fluorescent microspheres (3x106, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) of specific emission spectra, were injected into the left atrium [37, 38]. A reference aortic blood sample was withdrawn at a rate of 7 ml/min which was initiated 5 s prior to injection and continued for 120 s following injection. The pigs were then exercised at a treadmill workload of 3 miles/h, at a 15° incline for a 10-min interval. In preliminary studies from this laboratory as well as consistent with past reports [39], this treadmill protocol resulted in a near maximal heart rate for pigs. During the last minute of exercise, hemodynamics and blood samples were collected and microspheres delivered.

2.2 Neurohormonal profiles and drug levels
The plasma samples were assayed for renin activity, endothelin concentration, and catecholamine levels. Plasma renin activity was determined by computing angiotensin I production using a radioimmunoassay procedure (ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT). For the endothelin assays, the plasma was first eluted over a cation exchange column (C-18 Sep-Pak, Waters Associates, Milford, MA) and then dried by vacuum-centrifugation. The samples were reconstituted in 0.02 M borate buffer. A high sensitivity radioimmunoassay was performed to determine endothelin concentrations (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine were measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and normalized to pg/ml of plasma. Plasma concentrations of valsartan were determined by an AT1 receptor binding assay using smooth muscle cell membrane preparations as described previously [40].

2.3 Regional blood flow measurements
All of the tissue samples were fixed in 10% formaldehyde in order to facilitate slicing. The mid-region of the LV free wall was separated into endocardial and epicardial layers weighing approximately 3 g each. Samples of approximately 3–5 g were also collected and prepared from the basal regions of the lung, kidney, diaphragmatic muscle, latissimus dorsi, and gluteus maximus. The tissue samples were carefully weighed and then digested using a potassium hydroxide solution as previously described [37, 38]. The aortic blood samples were extracted using an identical digestion solution. The fluorescence of the extracted samples were then determined by spectrofluorimetry (Gilford Fluoro IV, Oberlin, OH). The fluorescent microspheres used in this study with respect to excitation/emission characteristics were: blue–green, 428/457 nm; orange, 534/550 nm; red, 580/594 nm; and scarlet, 650/674 nm, respectively. These fluorescent microspheres were chosen since a spectral scan which conformed to a Gaussian distribution could be uniformly obtained, minimal spectral cross-over occurred, and they provided equivalent sensitivity [38]. Regional blood flow computations were determined using the standard formula: Qm=(ArxAm)/Qr. Where Qm is the blood flow in ml/min, Ar is the fluorescence of the aortic reference sample, Am is the fluorescence of the tissue sample, and Qr is the withdrawal rate of the reference sample. Final blood flow values were normalized to sample weights and expressed as ml/min/g. Coronary vascular resistance was determined as the mean aortic pressure divided by LV myocardial blood flow and expressed as (mmHg min/ml g) [30].

2.4 Data analysis
Indices of LV function and systemic hemodynamics were compared among the treatment groups using analysis of variance. If the analysis of variance revealed significant differences, pairwise tests of individual group means were compared using Bonferroni probabilities. For comparisons of neurohormonal profiles, the Student–Neuman–Keul test was employed. All statistical procedures were performed using the BMDP statistical software package (BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles, CA). Results are presented as mean±s.e.m. Values of P<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.


    3 Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
3.1 LV function with pacing CHF: effects of ACE inhibition, AT1 blockade, and combination therapy
All of the pigs enrolled in the present study successfully completed the experimental protocols. In the concomitant AT1 receptor blockade and rapid pacing group, valsartan plasma levels were 338±101 nmol/l and in the ACE inhibition and AT1 blockade group, plasma levels were 262±48 nmol/l, with no significant difference between groups (P=0.56). These plasma levels for the AT1 antagonist fell within the target therapeutic range determined from previously established dose response studies [26].

3.1.1 Resting state
LV size and pump function for the treatment groups are presented in Fig. 1 and hemodynamic indices measured in the resting awake state for all of the treatment groups are summarized in Table 1. Ambient resting heart rate was increased by 37% in the rapid pacing only group when compared to controls. In the combined treatment group, heart rate was lower than AT1 monotherapy values, but remained increased from control values. Stroke volume was reduced by approximately 50% in the rapid pacing only group when compared to control values. In the ACE inhibition and combination therapy groups, stroke volume was higher than untreated pacing values and similar to control values. Systemic aortic pressure was lower in the rapid pacing only group and all three treatment groups when compared to controls. Pulmonary artery and left atrial pressures were increased by over 2-fold in the rapid pacing only group when compared to controls. While remaining increased from control values, pulmonary and left atrial pressures were reduced in the ACE inhibition and combination therapy groups when compared to rapid pacing only values. Systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances are presented in Fig. 2.


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Left ventricular (LV) end diastolic dimension and fractional shortening in conscious pigs under ambient resting conditions. With the development of pacing induced congestive heart failure (CHF), end diastolic dimension increased, and fractional shortening decreased. With ACE inhibition (ACEI), LV end diastolic dimension was decreased and fractional shortening was increased from rapid pacing only values. With AT1 receptor blockade (AT1-block), end diastolic dimension and fractional shortening were similar to rapid pacing only values. With combination therapy (ACEI/AT1-block), end diastolic dimension was decreased and fractional shortening was increased when compared to rapid pacing only. LV function was similar in the combination therapy group when compared to the ACE inhibition group, and was significantly different from the AT1 receptor blockade group. (*P<0.05 vs. control; +P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing only; §P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing and ACEI; P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing and AT1-block).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Systemic hemodynamics, LV function and geometry with pacing induced heart failure: effects of ACE inhibition, AT1–Ang II receptor blockade, or combined ACE inhibition and AT1–Ang II receptor blockade during the progression of heart failure

 

Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Pulmonary (top panel) and systemic (bottom panel) vascular resistances fell in all groups with treadmill exercise (P<0.05 vs. resting state). Pulmonary vascular resistance was increased in the rapid pacing group compared to controls, and was reduced in all 3 treatment groups when compared to rapid pacing only values. With treadmill exercise, combination therapy (ACEI/AT1-block) normalized pulmonary vascular resistance. Systemic vascular resistance was increased in the rapid pacing group compared to control values, and reduced in all 3 treatment groups when compared to rapid pacing only values. Furthermore, systemic vascular resistance in the ACE inhibition (ACEI) and combination therapy groups was lower than rapid pacing only values and control values. (*P<0.05 vs. control; +P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing only; §P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing and ACEI; P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing and AT1-block).

 
3.1.2 Treadmill exercise
In all groups, respiratory rate significantly increased with treadmill exercise when compared to resting values (Table 1). In all rapid pacing groups, heart rate increased significantly from resting values with exercise, but remained lower than that achieved in the normal control state. In the rapid pacing only group, treadmill exercise resulted in a significant increase in stroke volume, but remained reduced from normal control values. Pulmonary artery and left atrial pressures remained increased in the rapid pacing only group and the AT1 receptor blockade group when compared to control values. In the ACE inhibition group and combination therapy group, pulmonary and left atrial pressures were reduced from rapid pacing only values. Changes in systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance with treadmill induced exercise are presented in Fig. 2. In the control state, resting systemic oxygen consumption (VO2) increased by over 4-fold with treadmill induced exercise (7.2±0.4 vs. 30.2±1.5 ml O2/min/kg, P<0.05). In the rapid pacing only group, VO2 was similar to control values at rest, but significantly reduced with exercise (19.1±1.1 ml O2/min/kg). In all treatment groups, resting and exercise VO2 were similar to rapid pacing only values.

3.2 Neurohormonal activity: effects of ACE inhibition, AT1 blockade, and combination therapy
3.2.1 Resting state
Plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine values were increased in the rapid pacing only group (Table 1). In all treatment groups, plasma norepinephrine was reduced from rapid pacing only values, but remained increased from control values. In the AT1 receptor blockade group, plasma norepinephrine was higher when compared to the ACE inhibition or combination therapy groups. Plasma epinephrine was reduced in the combination therapy group when compared to rapid pacing only values, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.14). In the rapid pacing only group, plasma endothelin increased by 3-fold from control values. Plasma endothelin was reduced in all treatment groups when compared to rapid pacing only values, but remained increased from control values. Plasma renin activity increased by 8-fold in the rapid pacing only group when compared to normal control values, and remained increased in all treatment groups.

3.2.2 Treadmill exercise
The absolute change in plasma catecholamines in the normal control state and in all of the rapid pacing groups is summarized in Fig. 3. The relative increase in plasma epinephrine was blunted only in the combination therapy group. In the combination therapy group, plasma endothelin levels fell from resting values with treadmill exercise.


Figure 3
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 The absolute change from resting, untreated baseline values for plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine and plasma endothelin with treadmill exercise. Top panel: in the rapid pacing group, the relative rise in plasma norepinephrine was increased from control values. With ACE inhibition (ACEI), the relative increase in plasma norepinephrine was reduced from rapid pacing values. With AT1 receptor blockade (AT1-block), the relative increase in plasma norepinephrine was similar to untreated rapid pacing values. With combination therapy (ACEI/AT1-block), the increase in plasma norepinephrine was reduced from rapid pacing only and AT1 receptor blockade values. Middle panel: in the combination therapy group, the relative increase in plasma epinephrine with exercise was significantly reduced when compared to control and rapid pacing only values. Bottom panel: in the AT1 receptor blockade group, the relative change in plasma endothelin values was increased from control values. In contrast, combination therapy resulted in an absolute decline in endothelin values. This reduction was different from control and monotherapy values, and was reduced from rapid pacing only values (P=0.09). (*P<0.05 vs. control; +P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing only; §P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing and ACEI; P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing and AT1-block).

 
3.3 Regional blood flow: effects of ACE inhibition, AT1 blockade, and combination therapy
3.3.1 Resting state
LV myocardial blood flow was reduced in the rapid pacing only group when compared to normal control values (Table 2). In the monotherapy groups, LV myocardial blood flow remained reduced from control values. However, in the combination therapy group, LV myocardial blood flow was normalized in both the endocardial and epicardial regions. Coronary vascular resistance is summarized in Fig. 4. Pulmonary parenchymal flow was reduced by 50% from normal control values in the rapid pacing only group. Pulmonary blood flow was normalized in the ACE inhibition and combination therapy groups, but remained reduced in the AT1 receptor blockade group. Renal blood flow was reduced in the rapid pacing only group and both monotherapy groups, when compared to normal control values. Renal blood flow was normalized in the combination therapy group. In the AT1 receptor blockade group, skeletal muscle flow was reduced from control and rapid pacing only values.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Blood flow with pacing induced heart failure: effects of ACE inhibition, AT1–Ang II receptor blockade, or combined ACE inhibition and AT1–Ang II receptor blockade during the progression of heart failure

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Coronary vascular resistance fell in all groups with treadmill exercise (P<0.05 vs. resting state). In the resting state, coronary vascular resistance was increased in the rapid pacing group and the AT1 receptor blockade (AT1-block) group when compared to control values. In the ACE inhibition (ACEI) group, coronary vascular resistance was similar to control values. In the combination therapy (ACEI/AT1-block) group, coronary vascular resistance was reduced from both control and rapid pacing only values. With exercise, coronary vascular resistance remained increased in the rapid pacing group. In all treatment groups, coronary vascular resistance with exercise was similar to normal control values. (*P<0.05 vs. control; +P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing only; §P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing and ACEI; P<0.05 vs. rapid pacing and AT1-block).

 
3.3.2 Treadmill exercise
LV myocardial blood flow increased by approximately 4-fold in the normal control state with treadmill exercise (Table 2). In the rapid pacing only group, LV myocardial blood flow increased with exercise, but was 38% lower than normal control values. LV myocardial blood flow remained reduced from control values in all treatment groups. Coronary vascular resistance with treadmill induced exercise is summarized in Fig. 4. Pulmonary parenchymal flow increased by 4-fold in the normal control state with treadmill exercise, and was significantly blunted in the rapid pacing only group. In the ACE inhibition and combination therapy groups, pulmonary parenchymal flow increased from rapid pacing only values, but remained reduced from control values. Renal blood flow increased by 50% in the normal control state with exercise, but was reduced by 40% in the rapid pacing only group when compared to normal control values. Renal blood flow remained reduced in all treatment groups and was similar to rapid pacing only values. Skeletal muscle blood flow increased by over 5-fold in the control state and was significantly reduced in all of the rapid pacing groups. This was not affected by any drug treatment.


    4 Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
The relative contribution of AT1 receptor activity to the alterations in hemodynamic profiles which occur in the setting of severe congestive heart failure (CHF) is not fully understood. While AT1 receptor antagonists have been successfully used in patients with CHF [41], confounding influences such as multiple drug therapies, duration and degree of symptoms, duration of treatment, and methodological issues prevent the determination of the direct effects of AT1 receptor blockade on systemic hemodynamic profiles and regional blood flow patterns. Past studies have demonstrated that ACE inhibitors can influence a number of enzymatic pathways in addition to the renin–angiotensin system [19–24, 42]. Moreover, clinical and experimental studies have suggested that combined treatment with both ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade may provide additive effects with respect to vascular resistive properties [25]. Accordingly, the present study determined the effects of ACE inhibition, AT1 receptor blockade or combination therapy on hemodynamics, neurohormonal profiles, and regional blood flow distribution during the development of CHF. Using a chronically instrumented animal model of pacing induced CHF, several important observations were made. First, monotherapy with ACE inhibition or AT1 receptor blockade, as well as combination therapy, reduced systemic vascular resistive properties, improved cardiac output, and reduced neurohormonal system activation. Second, with treadmill exercise, combination therapy improved cardiac output and diminished neurohormonal system activity to a greater degree than that obtained with monotherapy treatment. The improvements in pump function and neurohormonal system activity were less pronounced in the AT1 receptor blockade treatment group when compared to either ACE inhibition or combination therapy. Third, combination therapy instituted during the development of CHF, improved resting myocardial blood flow and reduced coronary vascular resistance. This was not achieved with either ACE inhibition or AT1 receptor blockade alone. These findings suggest that combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade may provide beneficial effects on regional vascular resistive properties in the setting of developing CHF.

4.1 Systemic vascular resistive properties
In a past study, Symons and Stebbins reported that an acute infusion of losartan in normal pigs reduced systemic vascular resistance and increased myocardial blood flow with treadmill exercise [43]. In dogs with pacing induced CHF, Cheng and colleagues reported a significant increase in stroke volume following acute administration of losartan [44]. In a past report, this laboratory demonstrated that AT1 receptor blockade reduced systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance in anesthetized pigs with CHF [26]. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to examine both hemodynamic and regional blood flow profiles at rest and with exercise following chronic ACE inhibition or AT1 receptor blockade in a model of CHF. In the awake chronically instrumented state, chronic ACE inhibition or AT1 receptor blockade with developing pacing induced CHF reduced systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance both at rest and with treadmill induced exercise. These findings, as well as past reports [8, 26, 41, 44], clearly suggest that Ang-II formation and subsequent AT1 receptor activation contribute to the increased systemic vascular resistive properties with developing CHF. Furthermore, results from the present study demonstrated that combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade in this model of CHF reduced pulmonary vascular resistance to a greater degree than AT1 receptor blockade alone and was associated with increased bronchial blood flow. These results suggest that this combination treatment modality may provide additional beneficial effects within the pulmonary vasculature in the setting of CHF.

4.2 Myocardial blood flow and coronary vascular resistance
Consistent with past reports [30, 45], the present study demonstrated that the development of pacing induced CHF was associated with a significant reduction in myocardial blood flow at rest. This reduction in myocardial blood flow occurred in the absence of a physical obstruction to flow and therefore was likely due to changes in vascular resistive properties of the coronary vasculature. It has been reported previously that in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, abnormalities in myocardial oxygen delivery/demand exist [46]. Thus, the global reduction in LV myocardial blood flow may be a contributory factor towards the diminished LV performance with pacing induced CHF. In the present study, chronic ACE inhibition improved resting LV epicardial blood flow and coronary vascular resistance, whereas chronic treatment with AT1 receptor blockade failed to provide similar effects. Most importantly, the present study demonstrated that combined treatment normalized resting LV myocardial blood flow and reduced coronary vascular resistance to a greater degree than that of monotherapy with ACE inhibition. This reduction in coronary vascular resistance with combination therapy was achieved without a significant difference in resting blood pressure compared to the monotherapy groups. Thus, combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade in the setting of severe CHF may provide a beneficial means by which to improve resting myocardial blood flow without a compromise on systemic hemodynamics.

In a study by Sudhir and colleagues using an anesthetized dog model, the effects of the ACE inhibitor enalaprilat on coronary blood flow was examined [15]. In this past report, intracoronary administration of enalaprilat improved myocardial blood flow by approximately 19% when normalized to maximal flow achieved by adenosine. In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, Foult and colleagues demonstrated that intracoronary administration of enalaprilat, which had no effects on systemic perfusion pressure, improved coronary sinus blood flow [13]. The present study builds upon these past reports by demonstrating that chronic combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade improved resting myocardial blood flow to a greater degree than that of chronic ACE inhibition alone with the development of CHF. In order to more carefully examine LV myocardial blood flow under a physiological stress, measurements were also performed during treadmill induced exercise. Treadmill induced exercise increased relative LV myocardial blood flow in all treatment groups. However, with the development of pacing induced CHF, LV myocardial blood flow was reduced from control values with exercise. Unlike what was observed under resting conditions, LV myocardial blood flow was not significantly increased from pacing CHF values in any of the treatment groups with treadmill exercise. A number of vasoactive substances are locally released with increased myocardial work, which can significantly influence myocardial blood flow characteristics [47]. With the development of pacing induced CHF, a blunted response to endothelial mediated vasodilation as well as to adenosine has been reported [30, 48]. In addition, it has been suggested that the diminished coronary flow reserve with pacing induced CHF may be due to increased LV myocardial wall stress during diastole [45]. The findings of the present study would suggest that additional vasoconstrictive as well as mechanical influences, independent of either ACE or AT1 receptor mediated pathways, contribute to the persistent reduction in LV myocardial blood flow during exercise in this model of CHF.

4.3 Regional blood flow distribution
With the development of CHF, pulmonary parenchymal flow was significantly reduced both at rest and with treadmill induced exercise. Parenchymal flow is supplied by the bronchial arteries with venous return through the pulmonary veins. Contributory mechanisms for the reduced bronchial flow with pacing CHF most probably include both hemodynamic and neurohormonal factors. For example, increased hydraulic resistive pressure (left atrial pressure) with pacing CHF likely contributed to the reduction in bronchial flow. In the ACE inhibition group, left atrial pressure was reduced from pacing CHF values and was accompanied by increased bronchial flow, both at rest and with exercise. Interestingly, AT1 receptor blockade did not reduce left atrial pressure from pacing CHF values and in turn, was associated with no improvement in bronchial flow at rest or with exercise. Combination treatment, in which resting left atrial pressure was reduced from pacing CHF values, resulted in a normalization of resting bronchial flow. However, despite the significant reduction in left atrial pressure with treadmill exercise in both the ACE inhibition and combination treatment groups, bronchial flow remained lower than control values. In a report by Townsley et al. [49], an enhanced vasoconstrictive response of the pulmonary vasculature to epinephrine was observed following the development of pacing induced CHF. Thus in the present study, inherent defects in the vasodilatory properties of the bronchial smooth muscle may have occurred with pacing CHF, which, in turn, contributed to the persistent defects in bronchial flow. While the contributory mechanisms for changes in bronchial flow with CHF are beyond the scope of the present study, these results do suggest that the defects in bronchial flow which occur with pacing induced CHF were probably not solely due to enhanced AT1 receptor activity.

Resting skeletal muscle blood flow was lowest in the AT1 receptor blockade group when compared to either the ACE inhibition or combination therapy group. This observation was likely due to the fact that ACE inhibition and combination therapy attenuated circulating norepinephrine and endothelin to a greater degree than that of AT1 receptor blockade, and therefore improved relative muscle perfusion. With treadmill induced exercise, skeletal muscle blood flow was significantly reduced with pacing CHF. This is consistent with a past report in which abnormalities in skeletal muscle perfusion were noted in dogs with pacing CHF during treadmill exercise [28]. Chronic ACE inhibition, AT1 receptor blockade, or combination therapy did not increase skeletal muscle blood flow from CHF values during exercise. With exercise, significant vascular smooth muscle vasodilation occurs primarily due to the local release of a number of metabolites [50]and the vascular response to these local metabolites has been reported to be abnormal with CHF [7]. These abnormalities in local vasodilatory response at the level of the muscle vasculature likely superseded any potential beneficial effects that inhibition of Ang-II formation or AT1 receptor activation may have provided with treadmill induced exercise.

4.4 Neurohormonal activity
Consistent with the clinical spectrum of CHF [2–6], the development of pacing induced CHF was accompanied by increased sympathetic nervous system activity as evidenced by elevated plasma catecholamine levels. As reported previously by this laboratory, chronic ACE inhibition with the development of pacing CHF, reduced plasma norepinephrine levels under resting, ambient conditions [26, 34]. In addition, and consistent with a recent report [26], the present study demonstrated that concomitant AT1 receptor blockade with developing pacing CHF did not cause a similar reduction in plasma norepinephrine. In the present study, combination ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade, significantly reduced plasma norepinephrine from pacing CHF values. With treadmill exercise, plasma norepinephrine increased significantly in the pacing CHF group, and was reduced with either chronic ACE inhibition or combination treatment. Moreover, the relative increase in both norepinephrine and epinephrine with exercise was reduced to a greater degree in the combination therapy group. This overall reduction in sympathetic nervous activity with combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade, particularly with exercise may have contributed to the relative reduction in vascular resistive properties.

With the development of pacing CHF, increased plasma levels of the potent vasoactive peptide, endothelin have been reported [26, 51]. One of the important findings of the present study was that combination treatment blunted the relative rise in plasma endothelin levels with treadmill exercise when compared to untreated CHF values or monotherapy treatment values. In patients with CHF, a relationship between circulating levels of endothelin and the degree of pulmonary vascular resistance has been reported [5, 51]. For example, Tsutamoto and colleagues demonstrated that in patients with severe CHF, endothelin spillover in the pulmonary circuit occurred and correlated to the degree of pulmonary vascular resistance [51]. Kiowski et al. reported that acute administration of the non-selective endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, significantly reduced systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with CHF [52]. In a model of CHF induced by chronic caval occlusion, Cannan and colleagues demonstrated that the coronary vasoconstrictor effects of endothelin were increased [53]. Thus in the present study, the relative reduction in plasma endothelin levels which occurred in the combination therapy group, particularly during treadmill induced exercise, likely contributed to the reduction in pulmonary and coronary vascular resistance.

With the development of pacing induced CHF, plasma renin activity was increased from control values both at rest and with exercise. With chronic ACE inhibition, AT1 receptor blockade, or combination treatment, plasma renin activity remained increased from normal control values. This persistent elevation in plasma renin activity with ACE inhibition or AT1 receptor blockade was not surprising and is consistent with interruption of the renin–angiotensin enzymatic pathway. The development of CHF has been demonstrated to cause changes in plasma and myocardial Ang-II levels [2, 6, 9, 13, 33, 54–56]. Furthermore, alternative pathways for the local production of Ang-II have been identified [54, 55]. Direct assessment of local production of Ang-II levels was not performed in the present study, and therefore the relative production of Ang-II and AT1 Ang-II receptor activity could not be addressed. Future studies which directly examine Ang-II production within the LV as well as steady-state plasma levels following ACE inhibition, AT1 Ang-II receptor blockade, or combination therapy in this model of CHF are necessary in order to address this important study limitation.

4.5 LV function and geometry
Consistent with past reports from this laboratory and others [26–34, 43, 45], chronic rapid pacing caused LV dilation and pump dysfunction. The progressive LV dilation which occurs with chronic rapid pacing results in recruitment of the Frank–Starling mechanism, but this mechanism is exhausted and results in diminished LV stroke volume with prolonged periods of pacing [29]. Concomitant ACE inhibition or combination treatment with chronic rapid pacing reduced the degree of LV dilation and improved LV pump function. The reduction in LV end-diastolic volume which was achieved through chronic ACE inhibition has been demonstrated previously to be paralleled at the cellular level by a reduction in isolated myocyte resting length [26, 34]. Because of the persistently elevated basal heart rate in the AT1 receptor blockade group, resting cardiac output was higher than pacing CHF values and similar to ACE inhibition and combination treatment. However, consistent with a recent report [26], chronic AT1 receptor blockade with rapid pacing did not provide similar effects with respect to LV dilation. In a recent study by Weinberg and colleagues, it was demonstrated that AT1 receptor blockade did not prevent LV myocardial remodeling following chronic aortic stenosis in rats [57], whereas these investigators demonstrated previously that ACE inhibition attenuated the LV myocardial remodeling in this model of hypertrophy [58]. The results from these reports as well as the present study suggest that the mechanisms of action of chronic ACE inhibition with respect to LV dilation and remodeling, are, at least in part, independent of Ang-II formation and subsequent AT1 receptor activation.

4.6 Potential mechanisms for the effects of combination treatment
Chronic ACE inhibition reduced the degree of LV dilation, increased LV pump function and diminished neurohormonal system activity to a greater degree than that obtained with chronic AT1 receptor blockade with pacing induced CHF. Combination therapy in which ACE inhibition was added to AT1 receptor blockade yielded beneficial effects similar to that of ACE inhibition alone. The experimental design of the present study was predicated on past studies in which favorable effects on vascular resistance and blood flow have been reported with ACE inhibition [12, 13, 15]. However, it must be recognized that the effects of ACE inhibition on vascular tone may not be solely due to interruption of Ang-II formation. It is has been well established that ACE inhibitors can influence other enzyme systems and bioactive peptide levels such as bradykinin [14, 20–24, 42]. For example, in a recent study by Henrion and colleagues, the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan only caused partial relaxation of rat resistance arteries when compared to ACE inhibition [10]. Furthermore, in this past study, arterial relaxation achieved through ACE inhibition was significantly attenuated in the presence of a bradykinin antagonist. Barra et al. recently demonstrated that AT1 receptor blockade did not induce similar changes in compliance compared to ACE inhibition in a canine aortic preparation [14]. Hornig et al. reported that the vasodilatory effects of ACE inhibition in the radial artery of normal human subjects was primarily due to an accumulation of bradykinin [42]. In the present study, the differential effects between ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade with respect to LV function and neurohormonal system activity was probably due to the differences in bradykinin levels. Furthermore, a potential mechanism for the additive effects of combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade on vascular resistive properties is probably due to a potentiated effect of ACE inhibition on alternative enzyme systems, such as the bradykinin pathway. In light of the findings of the present study as well as recent reports [24, 42], future studies which employ bradykinin receptor agonists and antagonists in this model of CHF are warranted.

In a recently completed study, receptor binding studies using LV myocardial preparations from normal and pacing CHF pigs revealed that the AT1 receptor was the predominant Ang-II receptor subtype [26]. Thus, the predominant Ang-II receptor subtype expressed in both normal and failing porcine myocardium was the AT1 receptor and thereby minimized potential confounding influences of AT2 receptor activity. However, this past report demonstrated that the absolute LV myocardial AT1 receptor density was decreased with pacing induced CHF [26]. In a recent study, Asano and colleagues reported a significant reduction in LV myocardial AT1 receptor density with end-stage human cardiomyopathy [59]. Thus, the downregulation of the AT1 receptor which occurs with the progression of pacing induced CHF appears to be similar to what occurs in clinical forms of severe CHF. More importantly, these observations may provide an additional explanation by which AT1 receptor blockade failed to provide similar results to that achieved by ACE inhibition. A relatively high abundance of the AT2 receptor subtype has been reported in the human myocardium [59, 60]. Whether and to what degree changes in relative AT1 /AT2 receptor density influence LV myocardial function and remodeling with developing CHF remain unclear. In a past report by this laboratory, chronic combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade returned myocardial Ang-II receptor density to near control levels [26]. Thus, a potential mechanism for the additive effects of combination therapy which were observed in the present study may have been due to favorable effects on AT1 receptor density and transduction. The controlling mechanisms for AT1 receptor expression in this model of CHF and the interactive effects of ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade warrant further study.

4.7 Study limitations and summary
The results of the present study hold clinical significance in light of the use of losartan, an AT1 receptor antagonist, in the Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) trial. In the ELITE study, AT1 receptor blockade was well tolerated in patients with CHF, as evidenced by a low attrition rate. AT1 receptor antagonist treatment appeared to be associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality [61]. While additional studies using this model are warranted, combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade may be of particular benefit in the setting of CHF.

The present project employed a model of chronic rapid pacing which produced changes in LV functional and neurohormonal characteristics similar to that of the clinical spectrum of CHF [1–7, 49]. Using this animal model of CHF provided an opportunity to determine the acute effects of AT1 receptor blockade in the absence of confounding influences which may be encountered in clinical studies. However, it must be recognized that any animal model will not fully represent the complex clinical spectrum of CHF. Specifically, the changes in LV myocardial structure which occur with pacing induced CHF are not similar to clinical forms of CHF due to chronic ischemia or hypertensive disease [62]. Furthermore, this model of chronic rapid pacing for 3 weeks produces a rapidly progressive model of CHF which is in contrast to clinical forms of CHF which occur over a period of months to years. In a past clinical study, AT1 receptor blockade with losartan reduced systemic vascular resistance in the setting of CHF; which appeared to be dose dependent [41]. Similar to this past clinical study, AT1 receptor blockade with the development of pacing induced CHF reduced systemic vascular resistance. However, in the present study, the dosage of AT1 receptor antagonist was selected based upon attenuating the Ang-II pressor response and not producing a significant hypotensive effect when compared to that of ACE inhibition [26]. Thus, whether higher doses of either ACE inhibition, AT1 receptor blockade, or a combination of both therapies may provide further beneficial effects on hemodynamics and neurohormonal profiles in the setting of CHF could not be addressed by the current experimental design. Furthermore, whether and to what degree ACE inhibition and/or AT1 receptor blockade may influence ventricular function, neurohormonal activity, and blood flow distribution in the normal myocardium was not addressed in the current experimental design. These limitations not withstanding, the present study demonstrated that in this model of CHF, the effects of ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade did not provide equivalent effects with respect to hemodynamics and neurohormonal profiles in the resting and exercise state. However, combination treatment improved vascular resistive properties, neurohormonal profiles and regional blood flow to a greater degree than with either treatment alone. The importance of these findings are two-fold. First, these results provide additional evidence that the mechanisms of action of ACE inhibition in the setting of CHF are not solely due to an attenuation of AT1 receptor activity. Second, combined ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade may provide unique beneficial effects in the setting of severe CHF.

Time for primary review 26 days.


    Acknowledgements
 
Supported by National Institutes of Health grant HL-45024 (F.G.S.) and HL-56603 (F.G.S.), a Basic Research Grant from Novartis (F.G.S.), American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid (F.G.S.), and an AHA Medical Student Fellowship Award (S.B.K.). F.G.S. is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 

  1. V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. Cohn JN, Johnson GR, Shabetai R, et al. Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation (1993) 87:VI5–VI16.[Medline]
  2. SOLVD investigators. Benedict CR, Weiner DH, Johnstone DE, et al. Comparative neurohormonal responses in patients with preserved and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction: Results of the studies of left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol (1993) 22:146A–153A.[Medline]
  3. Bristow MR, Ginsburg R, Umans V, et al. β1 and β2 Adrenergic-receptor subpopulations in nonfailing and failing human ventricular myocardium: coupling of both receptor subtypes to muscle contraction and selective β1-receptor down regulation in heart failure. Circ Res (1986) 59:297–309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wei CM, Lerman A, Rodeheffer RJ, et al. Endothelin in human congestive heart failure. Circulation (1994) 89:1580–1586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cody RJ, Haas GJ, Binkley PF, Capers Q, Kelley R. Plasma endothelin correlates with the extent of pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Circulation (1992) 85:504–509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Fifer MA, Colucci WS, Lorell BH, Jaski BE, Barry WH. Inotropic, vascular and neuroendocrine effects of nifedipine in heart failure: Comparison with nitroprusside. J Am Coll Cardiol (1985) 5:731–737.[Abstract]
  7. Katz S, Mancini D, Jondeau G. Physiological determinants of maximal and submaximal exercise capacity in normal subjects and patients with heart failure. Heart Fail (1996) 11:236–242.
  8. Timmermans PBMW, Wong PC, Chiu AT, et al. Angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Pharmacol Rev (1993) 45:205–251.[Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Dzau VJ. Local expression and pathophysiological role of renin–angiotensin in the blood vessels and heart. Basic Res Cardiol (1993) 88(Suppl_1):1–14.
  10. Henrion D, Benessiano J, Levy BI. In vitro modulation of a resistance artery diameter by the tissue renin–angiotensin system of a large donor artery. Circ Res (1997) 80:189–195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Roy BJ, Pitts VH, Townsley MI. Pulmonary vascular response to angiotensin II in canine pacing-induced heart failure. Am J Physiol (1996) 271:H222–H227.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Strauer BE, Vogt M, Motz W. ACE inhibitors and coronary microcirculation. Basic Res Cardiol (1993) 88(Suppl 1):97–106.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Foult JM, Tavolaro O, Antony I, Nitenberg A. Coronary vasodilation induced by intracoronary enalaprilat: an argument for the role of a local renin–angiotensin system in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J (1989) 10:97–100.[Free Full Text]
  14. Barra JG, Levenson J, Armentano L, et al. In vivo angiotensin II receptor blockade and converting enzyme inhibition on canine aortic viscoelasticity. Am J Physiol (1997) 41:H859–H868.
  15. Sudhir K, MacGregor JS, Gupta M, et al. Effect of selective angiotensin II receptor antagonism and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on the coronary vasculature in vivo. Circulation (1993) 87:931–938.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. The CONSENSUS trial study group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure; results of the Cooperative North Scandanavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). New Engl J Med (1987) 316:1429–1435.[Abstract]
  17. The SOLVD investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. New Engl J Med (1991) 325:293–302.[Abstract]
  18. SOLVD investigators. Konstam MA, Kronenberg MW, Rousseau MF, et al. Effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril on the long-term progression of left ventricular dilation in patients with asymptomatic systolic dysfunction. Circulation (1993) 88:2277–2283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Cushman DW, Wang FL, Fung WC, et al. Comparison in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo of the actions of seven structurally diverse inhibitors of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). Br J Clin Pharmacol (1989) 28:115s–131s.[Medline]
  20. Jeanneret LJ. Modulation of proteolytic activity in tissues following chronic inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme. Biochem Pharmacol (1993) 45:1447–1454.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Nolly H, Carbini LA, Scicli G, Carretero OA, Scicli G. A local kallikrein–kinin system is present in rat hearts. Hypertension (1994) 23:919–923.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ehring T, Baumgart D, Krajcar M, et al. Attenuation of myocardial stunning by the ACE inhibitor ramiprilat through a signal cascade of bradykinin and prostaglandins but not nitric oxide. Circulation (1994) 90:1368–1385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Gohlke P, Linz W, Scholkens BA, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition improves cardiac function. Role of bradykinin. Hypertension (1994) 23:411–418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. McDonald KM, Mock J, D'Aloia A, et al. Bradykinin antagonism inhibits the antigrowth effects of converting enzyme inhibition in the dog myocardium after discrete transmural myocardial necrosis. Circulation (1995) 91:2043–2048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Azizi M, Chatellier G, Guyene TT, Murieta-Geoffroy D, Menard J. Additive effects of combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II antagonism on blood pressure and renin release in sodium depleted normotensives. Circulation (1995) 92:825–834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Spinale FG, de Gasparo M, Whitebread S, et al. Modulation of the renin–angiotensin pathway through enzyme inhibition and specific receptor blockade in pacing induced heart failure: I. Effects on left ventricular performance and neurohormonal systems. Circulation (1997) 96:2385–2396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Armstrong PW, Stopps TP, Ford SE, DeBold AJ. Rapid ventricular pacing in the dog: pathophysiologic studies of heart failure. Circulation (1986) 74:1075–1084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Wilson JR, Mtthai W, Lanoce V, Frey M, Ferraro N. Effect of experimental heart failure on peripheral sympathetic vasoconstriction. Am J Physiol (1988) 254:H727–H733.[Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Komamura K, Shannon RP, Ihara T, et al. Exhaustion of the Frank–Starling mechanism in conscious dogs with heart failure. Am J Physiol (1993) 34:H1119–H1131.
  30. Spinale FG, Tanaka R, Crawford FA, Zile MR. Changes in myocardial blood flow during the development and recovery from tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy. Circulation (1992) 85:717–729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Cheng CP, Noda T, Nozawa T, Little WC. Effect of heart rate on the mechanism of exercise-induced augmentation of mitral valve flow. Circ Res (1993) 72:795–806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Spinale FG. Pacing tachycardia-induced congestive heart failure. Heart Fail (1995) 11:219–232.
  33. Travill CM, Williams TDM, Pate P, et al. Hemodynamic and neurohormonal response in heart failure produced by rapid ventricular pacing. Cardiovasc Res (1992) 26:783–790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Spinale FG, Holzgrefe HH, Mukherjee R, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and the progression of congestive cardiomyopathy: effects on left ventricular and myocyte structure and function. Circulation (1995) 92:562–568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Criscione L, de Gasparo M, Bühlmayer P, et al. Pharmacological profile of valsartan: a potent, orally active, nonpeptide antagonist of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor subtype. Br J Pharmacol (1993) 110:761–771.[Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Smith AC, Spinale FG, Zellner JL, Swindle MM. Sedative and cardiovascular effects of midazolan in swine. Lab Anim Sci (1991) 41:157–161.[Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Prinzen FW, Glenny RW. Developments in non-radioactive microsphere techniques for blood flow measurements. Cardiovasc Res (1994) 28:1467–1475.[Free Full Text]
  38. Abel FL, Cooper RH, Beck RR. Use of fluorescent latex microspheres to measure coronary blood flow distribution. Circ Shock (1993) 41:156–161.[Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Roth DM, White FC, Nichols ML, et al. Effect of long term exercise on regional myocardial function and coronary collateral development after gradual coronary artery occlusion in pigs. Circulation (1990) 82:1778–1789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Macari D, Whitebread S, Cumin F, de Gasparo M, Levens N. Renal actions of the angiotensin AT2 receptor ligands CGP42112 and PD123319 after blockade of the renin–angiotensin system. Eur J Pharmacol (1994) 259:27–36.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Losartan Hemodynamic Study Group. Crozier I, Ikram H, Awan N, et al. Losartan in heart failure. Hemodynamic effects and tolerability. Circulation (1995) 91:691–697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hornig B, Kohler C, Drexler H. Role of bradykinin in mediating vascular effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in humans. Circulation (1997) 95:1115–1118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Symons DJ, Stebbins CL. Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade during exercise: comparison of losartan and saralasin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol (1996) 28:223–231.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Cheng CP, Suzuki M, Ohte N, et al. Altered ventricular and myocyte response to angiotensin II in pacing induced heart failure. Circ Res (1993) 72:795–806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Shannon RP, Komamura K, Shen YT, Bishop SP, Vatner SF. Impaired regional subendocardial coronary flow reserve in conscious dogs with pacing-induced heart failure. Am J Physiol (1993) 265:H801–H809.[Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Neglia D, Parodi O, Gallopin M, et al. Myocardial blood flow response to pacing tachycardia and to dipyridamole infusion in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy without overt heart failure. Circulation (1995) 92:796–804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Marcus ML. Basic regulatory mechanisms in the coronary circulation. In: Marcus ML, editor. The coronary circulation in health and disease. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983:65–155.
  48. Wang J, Seyedi N, Xu XB, Wolin MS, Hintze TH. Defective endothelium mediated control of coronary circulation in conscious dogs after heart failure. Am J Physiol (1994) 266:H670–H680.[Web of Science][Medline]
  49. Townsley MI, Fu Z, Mathieu-Costello O, et al. Altered pulmonary microvasculature microreactivity to norepinephrine in canine pacing-induced heart failure. Circ Res (1994) 75:347–356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Sports physiology. In: Guyton AC, Hall JE, editors. Textbook of medical physiology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996:1059–1070.
  51. Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Maeda Y, Adachi T, Kinoshita M. Relation between endothelin-1 spillover in the lungs and pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol (1994) 23:1427–1433.[Abstract]
  52. Kiowski W, Sutsch G, Hunziker P, et al. Evidence for endothelin-1 mediated vasoconstriction in severe chronic heart failure. Lancet (1995) 346:732–736.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  53. Cannan CR, Burnett JC, Lerman A. Enhanced coronary vasoconstriction to endothelin B receptor activation in experimental congestive heart failure. Circulation (1996) 93:646–651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Urata H, Boehm KD, Philip A, et al. Cellular localization and regional distribution of an angiotensin II forming chymase in the heart. J Clin Invest (1993) 91:1269–1281.[Web of Science][Medline]
  55. Urata H, Healy B, Stewart RW, Bumpus FM, Husain A. Angiotensin II forming pathways in normal and failing human hearts. Circ Res (1990) 66:883–890.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Hirsch AT, Talsness CE, Schunkert H, Paul M, Dzau VJ. Tissue specific activation of cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme in experimental heart failure. Circ Res (1991) 69:475–482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Weinberg EO, Lee MA, Weigner M, et al. Angiotensin AT1 receptor inhibition. Effects on hypertrophic remodeling and ACE expression in rats with pressure-overload hypertrophy due to ascending aortic stenosis. Circulation (1997) 95:1592–1600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Weinberg EO, Schoen FJ, George D, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition prolongs survival and modifies the transition to heart failure in rats with pressure overload hypertrophy due to ascending aortic stenosis. Circulation (1994) 90:1410–1422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Asano K, Dugcher DL, Port D, et al. Selective downregulation of the angiotensin II AT1 Ang-II receptor subtype in failing human ventricular myocardium. Circulation (1997) 95:1193–1200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Haywood GA, Gullestad L, Katsuya T, et al. AT1 and AT1 angiotensin receptor gene expression in human heart failure. Circulation (1997) 95:1201–1206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. ELITE Study Investigators. Pitt B, Segal R, Martinez FA, et al. Randomized trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study ELITE). Lancet (1997) 349:747–752.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  62. Iannini JP, Spinale FG. The identification of contributory mechanisms for the development and progression of congestive heart failure using animal models. J Heart Lung Transplant (1996) 15:1138–1150.[Web of Science][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. D. McEvoy, M. J. Sabbagh, A. G. Taylor, J. A. Zavadzkas, C. N. Koval, R. E. Stroud, R. L. Ford, J. E. McLean, S. T. Reeves, R. Mukherjee, et al.
Aprotinin Modifies Left Ventricular Contractility and Cytokine Release After Ischemia-Reperfusion in a Dose-Dependent Manner in a Murine Model
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2009; 108(2): 399 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
R. Schulz and G. Heusch
Review: AT 1-receptor blockade in experimental myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2001; 2(1_suppl): S136 - S140.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
D. Lebeche, Zhao Bin Kang, and R. Hajjar
Candesartan abrogates G protein-coupled receptors agonist-induced MAPK activation and cardiac myocyte hypertrophy
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2001; 2(1_suppl): S154 - S161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
M. S Weinberg, A. J Weinberg, and D. H Zappe
Effectively targetting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cardiovascular and renal disease: rationale for using angiotensin II receptor blockers in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2000; 1(3): 217 - 233.
[PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
L. A.M. Zornoff, S. A.R. Paiva, B. B. Matsubara, L. S. Matsubara, and J. Spadaro
Combination Therapy with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition and AT1 Receptor Inhibitor on Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction in Rats
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 2000; 5(3): 203 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krombach, R.S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinale, F. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krombach, R.S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinale, F. G
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?