Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1998 37(3):765-771; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(97)00291-5
© 1998 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holm, P.
Right arrow Articles by Franco-Cereceda, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holm, P.
Right arrow Articles by Franco-Cereceda, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1998, European Society of Cardiology

The ETA receptor antagonist, BMS-182874, reduces acute hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in pigs in vivo

Peter Holm*, Jan Liska and Anders Franco-Cereceda

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 (8) 51775546; Fax: +46 (8) 322701.

Received 7 April 1997; accepted 30 September 1997


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
Objective: Elevated levels of the potent vasoactive peptide endothelin (ET), have been found in pathophysiological conditions associated with pulmonary hypertension. In this study, we have investigated the effects of the ETA receptor antagonist, BMS-182874, on hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in pigs. Methods: Pigs were subjected to acute, intermittent 15-min periods of hypoxia (FiO2 0.1). Following a first hypoxia establishing hypoxic baseline values, vehicle or BMS-182874 (10 or 30 mg/kg) was administered i.v. before a second hypoxic period. In separate groups of animals, the effects of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) in combination with BMS-182874 (10 mg) during repeated hypoxia were investigated. The ET-1-blocking properties of BMS-182874 were studied in vivo by infusion of ET-1 during normoxia and in vitro using isolated porcine pulmonary arteries. Results: The hypoxia-evoked increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure was reduced by administration of BMS-182874 (10 mg/kg i.v.; from 42±8 to 34±4 mmHg, P<0.05 and 30 mg/kg i.v.; from 38±4 to 30±5 mmHg, P<0.05). In addition, BMS-182874 at 30 mg/kg reduced the pulmonary vascular resistance during hypoxia (from 7.4±1.5 to 5.3±1.1 mmHg·min·l–1 P<0.05). The hemodynamic response to repeated hypoxia was reproducible in control animals and unaffected by the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor diclophenac (3 mg/kg). Infusion of L-NNA alone resulted in an augmented pulmonary vasoconstriction during hypoxia; pulmonary arterial pressure from 35±6 to 43±9 mmHg; P<0.05 and vascular resistance from 7.2±1.1 to 9.9±1.8 mmHg·min·l–1; P<0.05. L-NNA in combination with BMS-182874 (10 mg/kg) resulted in a hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction of similar magnitude as hypoxic baseline. In addition, BMS-182874 reduced the hemodynamic response to ET-1 in normoxic pigs and competitively antagonized the vasoconstrictor effect of ET-1 in isolated porcine pulmonary arteries. Conclusions: The non-peptide, selective ETA receptor antagonist, BMS-182874, reduces hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in pigs. The reduction in pulmonary vascular response to hypoxia following BMS-182874 is at least partly independent of nitric oxide.

KEYWORDS BMS-182874; Endothelin; Hypoxia; Pig; Pulmonary hypertension


    1 Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
The circulating levels of the potent vasoactive peptide endothelin (ET) [1], have been found to be elevated in pathophysiological conditions associated with pulmonary hypertension [2]. The vascular effects of the isopeptide ET-1 are mediated by at least two classes of endothelin receptors [3, 4]; ETA receptors, selective for ET-1, causing vasoconstriction and ETB receptors, non-selective for the ET isopeptides and proposed to mediate either endothelium-dependent vasodilatation or when located on vascular smooth muscle cells vasoconstriction [5, 6]. The most conspicuous effect of ET is sustained vasoconstriction that is slow in onset, in concordance with a regulation of ET release at the level of transcription. Indeed, several studies have indicated that ET-1 may act as a mediator of pulmonary hypertension during chronic hypoxia [7, 8], whereas the time course for the contractile effects of ET has been considered to speak against a role for ET in acute hypoxia. However, physiological stimulation has been reported to produce rapid increases in the levels of circulating ET-1, indicating that endothelial cells may contain mature ET-1 [9]. In addition, immunoreactive ET-1 has been found within the cytoplasm of endothelial cells, indicating that preformed ET-1 may be present and available for rapid release in acute conditions [10].

We have, in a large animal in vivo model, evaluated the effects of ETA receptor antagonism using the selective, non-peptide ETA receptor antagonist, BMS-182874 [11], during normoxia and acute hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in pigs. The possible involvement of cyclo-oxygenase products and nitric oxide (NO) in the response to hypoxia was evaluated using diclophenac and N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA). To verify its ET-1-blocking properties, BMS-182874 was studied in vivo by infusion of ET-1 during normoxia and in vitro using isolated porcine pulmonary arteries.


    2 Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
This study was approved by the local Animal Research Ethical Committee in Stockholm. The investigation conforms with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1985). After premedication with ketamine (20 mg/kg, i.m), pigs (29±3 kg) were anesthetized with pentobarbital (15 mg/kg, i.v.), intubated and ventilated (Engström model 300, LKB, Sweden). A continuous infusion of fentanyl (10 µg·kg–1·h–1), midazolam (100 µg·kg–1·h–1) and pancuronium bromide (100 µg·kg–1·h–1) maintained anesthesia and skeletal muscle relaxation. Inspired ventilatory volumes were adjusted to pCO2 at 30–38 mmHg (1 mmHg=133 Pa). During normoxia the pigs were ventilated with room air and during hypoxia with a mixture of room air and N2. The fraction of inhaled O2 was monitored (Serve gas monitor, Siemens, Germany) during hypoxia and kept at 10%. Ringer acetate solution (100–150 ml/h) was administered i.v. and the body temperature was kept at 37°C with a heating pad. Mean systemic artery pressure (MAP) was measured by a catheter in the left femoral artery. A Swan–Ganz catheter was introduced via the right jugular vein for measurements of mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and central venous pressure (CVP). Hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored and recorded (pressure transducers PVB, Triplus 6023, Germany; pressure monitor Hewlett-Packard 78342 A, Germany; pressure recorder Gould ES 1000, France). Cardiac output (CO) was measured in duplicate by thermodilution using a cardiac output computer (COM-2, Baxter, USA). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated as (MPAP–PCWP)/CO, systemic vascular resistance (SVR) as (MAP–CVP)/CO. Arterial and mixed venous blood samples were obtained simultaneously for measurements of blood gas tension and pH. BMS-182874 (generously provided by Dr. Suzanne Moreland, Bristol-Myers Squibb, USA) dissolved in 35 ml 5% NaHCO3 solution was injected as a bolus dose via the left femoral vein.

ET-1, dissolved in sterile water and angiotensin II (AII; Peninsula Labs., UK), dissolved in 0.9% NaCl, were administered through the Swan–Ganz catheter into the right ventricle or tested on isolated pulmonary arteries. L-NNA (Sigma Medical, USA) dissolved in 5% NaHCO3 solution was infused i.v. via the left femoral vein. Substance P (Peninsula Labs., UK) in 0.9% NaCl was injected as bolus dose i.v. Pigs were left to rest for 30 min after surgery.

2.1 BMS-182874 and controls during normoxia and hypoxia
Following a baseline measurement, the animals were subjected to hypoxia during a 15-min period and the hemodynamic parameters were recorded at the end of this period. Ventilation with room air was thereafter reinstituted. After 1 h rest, the animals were randomized to either i.v. bolus injection of vehicle (35 ml 5% NaHCO3) only (n=5) or BMS-182874, 10 mg/kg (n=7) or 30 mg/kg (n=7). Thirty min after the injections, the protocol was repeated; hemodynamic parameters were obtained during normoxia and at the end of a 15-min period of hypoxia.

2.2 L-NNA during normoxia and hypoxia
In another group of animals (n=6), hemodynamic recordings were made during basal normoxia and 15 min of hypoxia. After a 75-min resting period, an i.v. infusion of L-NNA (40 mg·kg–1·h–1) was started. After 15 min of L-NNA infusion, hemodynamic recordings were made first during normoxia, followed by measurements at the end of a 15-min hypoxic period. Substance P, known to induce vasodilatation mainly through endothelial-derived NO production, was given as bolus dose (5 µg) before and during normoxic L-NNA infusion in order to verify the NO-blocking properties of the dose of L-NNA. The rate of the L-NNA infusion was based on preliminary experiments investigating the dose–response curve for L-NNA and substance P in the present animal model (n=2, data not shown).

2.3 L-NNA and BMS-182874 during normoxia and hypoxia
In a separate group of animals (n=4), the above protocol using L-NNA (40 mg·kg–1·h–1) was repeated with the addition of BMS-182874 (10 mg/kg), given i.v. 15 min before L-NNA infusion was started. The hemodynamic recordings were then repeated during normoxia and hypoxia.

2.4 Diclophenac during normoxia and hypoxia
In another group consisting of 6 animals, hemodynamic parameters at the end of 15-min periods of hypoxia were recorded before and after administration of diclophenac (3 mg/kg), injected as an i.v. bolus dose 10 min before the second hypoxic period.

2.5 ET-1 infusion after BMS-182874 during normoxia
The dose–response relationship of cumulative infusion of ET-1 (10, 25, 50 and 100 ng·kg–1·min–1, 10 min each dose) into the right ventricle was established, during normoxia in controls (n=8) and after an i.v. bolus injection of BMS-182874 10 mg/kg (n=4).

2.6 AII after BMS-182874 during normoxia
To further confirm the selectivity of BMS-182874, the vascular effect of AII was also studied in separate groups of animals. AII was given either as a rapid injection (5 µg) into the right ventricle before and after BMS-182874 (30 mg/kg; n=8) or as continuous infusion (150 ng·kg–1·min–1 for 30 min; n=4) during which BMS-182874 (30 mg/kg) was given after 10 min.

2.7 In vitro experiments
Porcine pulmonary arteries with an inner diameter of 0.8–1.2 mm were obtained immediately postmortem from 6 pigs. The vessels (1–2 mm in length, n=25) were mounted in 2 ml organ baths using two L-shaped holders [12]. Circular contractions were induced by Tyrode's solution in which NaCl had been replaced with KCl to give a final concentration of 127 mmol/l K+. Only vessels responding with two reproducible contractions were used (n=25). ET-1 (10–10 to 10–7 mol/l) was added to the organ baths in a cumulative fashion in controls as well as vessels incubated for 20 min with BMS-182874 10–6 or 10–5 mol/l.

2.8 Statistics
Results are presented as means ± standard deviation. Ordinary or repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Bonferroni multiple comparison test or the Student's t-test for unpaired samples were used for statistical evaluation, (GraphPad Software, Instat 2.01). P<0.05 was considered significant.


    3 Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
3.1 BMS-182874 and controls during normoxia and hypoxia
In control animals (Table 1a), hypoxia (arterial pO2 24±8 mmHg) induced a reproducible increase in MPAP and PVR, which was reversed during normoxia. In animals receiving BMS-182874 at either 10 or 30 mg/kg (Table 1b,c), the first period of hypoxia (i.e. no BMS-182874 present) evoked a similar increase in MPAP and PVR which returned to baseline values during normoxia. In the pigs receiving BMS-182874 at 10 mg/kg, the second period of hypoxia resulted in a significantly lower MPAP compared to hypoxic baseline (Table 1b). In addition, the higher dose of BMS-182874 (30 mg/kg; Table 1c) resulted in a decrease of both the MPAP and PVR during the second hypoxic period compared to hypoxic baseline. In the systemic circulation, hypoxia resulted in a reduction in SVR, which was not significantly altered after administration of BMS-182874, while the MAP during hypoxia was reduced after BMS-182874 at 30 mg/kg. BMS-182874 (10 or 30 mg/kg) did not induce any significant hemodynamic alterations during normoxia, although a tendency to lower PVR was noted. BMS-182874 administration did not change arterial or venous blood gases (pH, pO2, pCO2, not shown) during normoxia or hypoxia. Vehicle was found to have no effects on hemodynamic parameters or blood gases.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and heart rate (HR) in control animals (a) and pigs receiving BMS-182874 10 mg/kg (b) or 30 mg/kg (c) during basal normoxia (normoxia 1), after 15 min of hypoxia (hypoxia 1), after 1.5 h intermediate normoxia (normoxia 2) and after 15 min of repeated hypoxia (hypoxia 2)

 
3.2 L-NNA during normoxia and hypoxia
Compared to basal conditions, infusion of L-NNA (40 mg·kg–1·h–1) did not evoke any significant hemodynamic changes during normoxia (Table 2a). However, L-NNA infusion during the second hypoxia resulted in an increase in MPAP and PVR compared to first hypoxic period. In the systemic circulation, L-NNA infusion elevated MAP during hypoxia. Substance P at a dose of 5 µg evoked a prompt reduction of the MAP and SVR by 30±8 and 36±9%, respectively. After administration of L-NNA the effect of substance P was highly reduced (4±4% reduction of MAP P<0.001 and 3±6% increase in SVR; P<0.01 compared to control).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and heart rate (HR) in animals receiving infusion of L-NNA alone (a) and pigs receiving L-NNA+BMS-182874 10 mg/kg (b) during basal normoxia (normoxia 1), after 15 min of hypoxia (hypoxia 1), after 1.5 h intermediate normoxia (normoxia 2) and after 15 min of repeated hypoxia (hypoxia 2)

 
3.3 L-NNA and BMS-182874 during normoxia and hypoxia
Infusion of L-NNA in the presence of BMS-182874 (10 mg/kg) did not evoke any hemodynamic changes during normoxia (Table 2b). However, during the second hypoxia (i.e. BMS-182874 and L-NNA present), the augmented hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, evident in the group of animals receiving L-NNA infusion alone (Table 2a), was reduced (Table 2b; hypoxia 2).

3.4 Diclophenac during normoxia and hypoxia
Intravenous administration of diclophenac (3 mg/kg) did not affect the hemodynamic parameters during normoxia or hypoxia. The pulmonary hypertensive effect of hypoxia remained unchanged (MPAP 37±6 mmHg; PVR 6.9±1.2 mmHg·min·l–1 before and MPAP 38±6 mmHg; PVR 7.4±2 mmHg·min·l–1 after diclophenac).

3.5 ET-1 infusion after BMS-182874 during normoxia
Cumulative infusion of ET-1 resulted in a dose-dependent increase in PVR and SVR, while the CO decreased (Fig. 1). At the highest dose (100 ng·kg–1·min–1) the ET-1 induced increase in PVR and SVR was attenuated in the animals receiving BMS-182874 compared to controls.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Effects of ET-1 infusion (10, 25, 50 and 100 ng/kg per min) on SVR (a), PVR (b) and CO (c) in control experiments and in animals receiving BMS-182874 (10 mg/kg). *P<0.05 Student's t-test for unpaired samples, comparing ET controls to corresponding values after administration of BMS-182874.

 
3.6 AII after BMS-182874 during normoxia
Bolus injection of AII (5 µg) evoked an increase in MAP (from 120±14 to 151±14 mmHg) and MPAP (from 19±4 to 26±4 mmHg), which remained unchanged after BMS-182874 administration (MAP 147±11 mmHg and MPAP 24±3 mmHg, respectively). Continuous infusion of AII (150 ng·kg–1·min–1 for 30 min) resulted in a stable, sustained increase in the pulmonary vasotonus (after 10 min of infusion; MPAP 169±11% and PVR 153±23% of values before infusion), which was not altered by BMS-182874 (20 min after BMS-182874 at 30 mg/kg; MPAP 155±12% and PVR 148±19% of control values before AII infusion).

3.7 In vitro experiments
Potassium (127 mmol/l) evoked a strong contraction (5.8±1.6 mN) of the isolated porcine pulmonary arteries which was unaffected by incubation with BMS-182874 (101±6 and 109±13%, at BMS 10–6 or 10–5 mol/l compared to K+-induced contractions, respectively). ET-1 caused a concentration-dependent contraction of the pulmonary arteries, which was dose-dependently attenuated by incubation with BMS-182874 (Fig. 2). The maximum response at the highest concentration of ET-1 was not altered by BMS-182874.


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Contractile effect of ET-1 in isolated pulmonary arteries in control experiments and after incubation with BMS-182874 at 10–6 or 10–5 mol/l. *P<0.05; {dagger}P<0.01. Repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing controls (ET alone) to values after BMS-182874 at 10–6 or 10–5 mol/l.

 

    4 Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 
Our present data show that ETA receptor antagonism with BMS-182874 can cause a dose-dependent, significant reduction of MPAP and PVR during hypoxia. The ET receptor blocking properties of BMS-182874 was apparent both in vivo and in vitro, while no effect was observed on the response to AII or K+. The in vitro experiments showing unaffected maximum response of ET-1 after BMS-182874 suggests competitive binding to the ETA receptor [11]. Although BMS-182874 has previously been shown to influence thromboxane A2 binding [11], the use of diclophenac in a concentration known to block cyclo-oxygenase activity [13]suggests that an involvement of cyclo-oxygenase products formed during hypoxia in the presently used experimental model is unlikely.

Our findings support earlier studies showing that the selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123, reduces the pulmonary vasoconstriction during acute hypoxia in mature fetal lambs [14]and in the rat [15], which has also been shown for pulmonary hypertension evoked by chronic hypoxia [16]. Other studies have shown no effect of BQ-123 on hypoxia-induced vasoconstriction in isolated rat lung [17]or in the intact newborn lamb [18]. These contradictory findings could be explained by differences between the species studied, age of the animals and experimental model employed.

It can be argued that although BMS-182874 evoked no clear-cut changes in vascular tonus during normoxia, there was a tendency to pulmonary vasodilatation and these changes in baseline tonus would alter the vascular response to hypoxia. The experimental protocol was designed to exclude variations in baseline values and responses to hypoxia between different groups of animals. Consequently, all conclusions were made from changes within each group of animals. The hypoxic measurements were made at the end of each hypoxic period and are not likely to be explained by values during the normoxia preceding 15 min of hypoxia. However, a limited influence of the lower normoxic baseline on the magnitude of hypoxic response cannot be excluded.

L-NNA elevated both pulmonary and systemic vascular tone during hypoxia, in concord with previous studies using nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in the pig [19]. Although hypoxia has been shown to reduce endothelium-derived NO activity in the rat [20], our data demonstrating an increase in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction after inhibition of NO support that endogenous NO acts as a pulmonary vasodilator during acute hypoxia [19].

Earlier studies have shown that ET, by activation of ETB receptors, can induce vasodilation through the release of NO and prostacyclin [21, 22]. Our data using diclophenac indicate that vasodilatation, through the release of prostacyclin during hypoxia, is of less importance in the model studied. Furthermore, BMS-182874 in combination with L-NNA resulted in a hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction of similar magnitude as hypoxic baseline, whereas the group of animals receiving L-NNA alone demonstrated an augmented hypoxic response during the second hypoxic period. These data indicate that the effects of BMS-182874 are at least partly independent of NO production. However, the complex interactions between ET and NO pathways may also contribute to these results. Endothelial-derived NO has been described to reduce ET-1 production in the porcine aorta in vitro [23]. NO inhibition could thereby result in an up-regulation of the ET pathway during hypoxia. In addition, it is possible that ETA antagonism could result in an up-regulation of the NO pathway. We have, in a recent study found, that the vasodilator effect of exogenously administered ET-1 during hypoxia is attenuated by the selective ETB receptor antagonist, BQ-788, although the hypoxic response per se was not affected by ETB antagonism [24]. A reduction of the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction following ETA receptor blockade could theoretically be attributed to an inhibition of ETA receptor-mediated vasoconstriction, thereby unmasking the vasodilator effect of ETB receptors on the vascular endothelium. However, our present data do not indicate that the observed effects of ETA receptor antagonism on hypoxic pulmonary hypertension are dependent on an indirect effect on ETB receptors, since infusion of L-NNA did not abolish the vasodilator effect of BMS-182874 and diclophenac was found to have no effect during hypoxia. Moreover, we have, in a previous study, found that the non-selective ET receptor antagonist, bosentan, also reduces the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the pig [25].

In humans, the circulating plasma levels of ET-1 are low during normal conditions, but elevated in a variety of pathological conditions including pulmonary hypertension (see [26]). Interestingly, mountaineers exposed to hypoxia at high altitude developed, within 22 h, elevated plasma ET-1 levels that correlated with estimated MPAP, indicating that ET may play a role in acute hypoxia in humans [27].

In conclusion, the present study shows that the non-peptidergic ETA antagonist, BMS-182874, can reduce the pulmonary hypertension in a large animal in vivo model of acute hypoxia, supporting the idea that ET may participate in pathological conditions associated with elevated PVR due to hypoxia.

Time for primary review 35 days.


    Acknowledgements
 
This study was supported by grants from the Heart–Lung Foundation, the Swedish Medical Research Council, the Wallenberg foundation, the Thuring foundation and Funds from the Karolinska Institute.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1 Introduction
 2 Methods
 3 Results
 4 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Yanagisawa M., Kiruhara H., Kimura S., et al. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature (1988) 332:411–415.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Cernacec P., Stewart D.J. Immunoreactive endothelin in human plasma: marked elevation in patients with cardiogenic shock. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (1989) 161:562–567.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Arai H., Hori S., Aramori I., Ohkubo H., Nakanishi S. Cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding an endothelin receptor. Nature (1990) 348:730–732.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Sakurai T., Yanagisawa M., Takawa Y., et al. Cloning of a cDNA encoding a nonisopeptide-selective-subtype of the endothelin receptor. Nature (1990) 347:732–735.
  5. Warner T.D., Mitchell J.A., de Nucci G., Vane J.R. Endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 release EDRF from isolated perfused arterial vessels of the rat and rabbit. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. (1989) 13:S85–S88.[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Clozel M., Gray G.A., Breu V., Löffler B., Osterwalder R. The endothelin ETB receptor mediates both vasodilatation and vasoconstriction in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (1992) 186:867–873.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Li H., Chen S.J., Chen Y.F., et al. Enhanced endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor gene expression in chronic hypoxia. J. Appl. Physiol. (1994) 77:1451–1459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bonvallet S.T., Zamora M.R., Hasunuma K., et al. BQ123, an ETA-receptor antagonist, attenuates hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in rats. Am. J. Physiol. (1994) 266(4 Pt. 2):H1327–H1331.[Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Fyhrquist F., Saijonmaa O., Metsarinne K., et al. Raised plasma endothelin-I concentration following cold pressor test. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (1990) 169:217–221.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Harrison V.J., Corder R., Ånggård E.E., Vane J.R. Evidence for vesicles that transport endothelin-1 in bovine aortic endothelial cells. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. (1993) 22(8):S57–S60.
  11. Webb M.L., Bird J.E., Liu E.C., et al. BMS-182874 is a selective, nonpeptide endothelin ETA receptor antagonist. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. (1995) 272:1124–1134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Franco-Cereceda A. Endothelin and neuropeptide Y-induced vasoconstriction of human epicardial coronary arteries in vitro. Br. J. Pharmacol. (1989) 97:968–972.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Weitzberg E. Circulatory responses to endothelin-1 and nitric oxide with special reference to endotoxin shock and nitric oxide inhalation. Acta Physiol. Scand. (1993) 148(Suppl. 611):1–72.[Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Wang Y., Coe Y., Toyoda O., Coceani F. Involvement of endothelin-1 in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the lamb. J. Physiol. (Lond.) (1995) 482(2):421–434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Oparil S., Chen S., Meng Q.C., et al. Endothelin-A receptor antagonism prevents acute hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. (1995) 268:L95–L100.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. DiCarlo V.S., Chen S., Meng Q.C., et al. ETA receptor antagonist prevents and reverses chronic hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. (1995) 269:L690–L697.[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Takeoka M., Ishizaki I., Sakai A., et al. Effect of BQ123 on vasoconstriction on either hypoxia or endothelin-1 in perfused rat lungs. Acta Physiol. Scand. (1995) 155:53–60.[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Wong J., Vanderford P.A., Winters J.W., et al. Endothelin-1 does not mediate acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the intact newborn lamb. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. (1993) 22(Suppl. 8):S262–S266.[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Emil S., Kanno S., Berkeland J., Kosi M., Atkinson J. Sustained vasodilatation after inhaled nitric oxide for hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in swine. J. Pediatr. Surg. (1996) 31:389–393.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Rodman D.M., Yamaguchi T., Hasunuma K., et al. Effects of hypoxia on endothelium-dependent relaxation of rat pulmonary artery. Am. J. Physiol. (1990) 258:L207–L214.[Web of Science][Medline]
  21. De Nucci G., Thomas R., D'Orleans-Juste, et al. Pressor effects of circulating endothelin are limited by its removal in the pulmonary circulation and by the release of prostacyclin and endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1988) 85:9797–9800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Warner T.D. Characterization of endothelin synthetic pathways and receptor subtypes. Physiological and pathophysiological implications. Eur. Heart J. (1993) 14(Suppl. 1):42–47.
  23. Boulanger C., Lüscher T.F. Release of endothelin from the porcine aorta: inhibition by endothelium-derived nitric oxide. J. Clin. Invest. (1990) 85:587–590.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Holm P., Liska J., Franco-Cereceda A. The endothelin ETB receptor antagonist BQ-788 reduces the pulmonary vasodilator effect of endothelin-1 during acute hypoxia in pigs. Eur. J. Pharmacol. (1997) 323:83–87.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Holm P., Liska J., Clozel M., Franco-Cereceda A. The endothelin antagonist bosentan: hemodynamic effects during normoxia and hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in pigs. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. (1996) 112:890–897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Holm P. Endothelin in the pulmonary circulation with special reference to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. (1997) 31(s46):1–40.[Web of Science]
  27. Goerre S., Wenk M., Bärtsch P., et al. Endothelin-1 in pulmonary hypertension associated with high-altitude exposure. Circulation (1995) 90:359–364.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
B. Petersen, M. Deja, R. Bartholdy, B. Donaubauer, S. Laudi, R. C. E. Francis, W. Boemke, U. Kaisers, and T. Busch
Inhalation of the ETA receptor antagonist LU-135252 selectively attenuates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R601 - R605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. A. Modesti, S. Vanni, M. Morabito, A. Modesti, M. Marchetta, T. Gamberi, F. Sofi, G. Savia, G. Mancia, G. F. Gensini, et al.
Role of Endothelin-1 in Exposure to High Altitude: Acute Mountain Sickness and Endothelin-1 (ACME-1) Study
Circulation, September 26, 2006; 114(13): 1410 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. Merkus, B. Houweling, A. Mirza, F. Boomsma, A. H van den Meiracker, and D. J Duncker
Contribution of endothelin and its receptors to the regulation of vascular tone during exercise is different in the systemic, coronary and pulmonary circulation
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2003; 59(3): 745 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
I. Hubloue, D. Biarent, S. A. Kafi, G. Bejjani, F. Kerbaul, R. Naeije, and M. Leeman
Endogenous endothelins and nitric oxide in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2003; 21(1): 19 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
W. Johnson, A. Nohria, L. Garrett, J. C. Fang, J. Igo, M. Katai, P. Ganz, and M. A. Creager
Contribution of endothelin to pulmonary vascular tone under normoxic and hypoxic conditions
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): H568 - H575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
Q. Liu, J. S. K. Sham, L. A. Shimoda, and J. T. Sylvester
Hypoxic constriction of porcine distal pulmonary arteries: endothelium and endothelin dependence
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): L856 - L865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
J. S. K. Sham, B. R. Crenshaw Jr., L.-H. Deng, L. A. Shimoda, and J. T. Sylvester
Effects of hypoxia in porcine pulmonary arterial myocytes: roles of KV channel and endothelin-1
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): L262 - L272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
B. Hocher, A. Schwarz, K. A. Fagan, C. Thöne-Reineke, K. El-Hag, H. Kusserow, S. Elitok, C. Bauer, H.-H. Neumayer, D. M. Rodman, et al.
Pulmonary Fibrosis and Chronic Lung Inflammation in ET-1 Transgenic Mice
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., July 1, 2000; 23(1): 19 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B.M Weiss and O.M Hess
Pulmonary vascular disease and pregnancy: current controversies, management strategies, and perspectives
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2000; 21(2): 104 - 115.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Doi, N. Smedira, and P. A. Murray
Pulmonary vasoregulation by endothelin in conscious dogs after left lung transplantation
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2000; 88(1): 210 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holm, P.
Right arrow Articles by Franco-Cereceda, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holm, P.
Right arrow Articles by Franco-Cereceda, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?