Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2006 70(2):167-169; doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.03.009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Dorado, D.
Right arrow Articles by Piper, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Dorado, D.
Right arrow Articles by Piper, H. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2006, European Society of Cardiology

Bringing preconditioning and postconditioning into focus

David Garcia-Doradoa,*, Jacob Vinten-Johansenb and Hans Michael Piperc

aHospital Univ Vall d'Hebron, Laboratorio de Cardiología Experimental, Servicio de Cardiología, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-12908035 Barcelona, Spain
bEmory University School of Medicine, Carlyle Fraser Heart Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
cPhysiologisches Institut, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 93 489 4038; fax: +34 93 489 4032. Email address: dgdorado@vhebron.net

Received 7 March 2006; accepted 14 March 2006

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

After many years of debate during which the preponderance of opinion was skeptical about the experimental and clinical existence of reperfusion injury (with attitudes ranging between polite condescendence and overt denial), it can be said that the controversy has been now largely resolved, and that the death of cardiomyocytes during reperfusion is now generally admitted as a fact. Perhaps this agreement is still more firm in the experimental literature than in clinical cardiology. The discovery of the phenomenon of postconditioning [1] has undoubtedly contributed to this change of opinion. The first reports of postconditioning the human heart by Laskey et al. and Ovize et al. certainly support the concept of reperfusion injury as a clinical entity that can be measured even in a small group of patients [2,3]. The report by Zhao et . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C. Pavoine and F. Pecker
Sphingomyelinases: their regulation and roles in cardiovascular pathophysiology
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2009; 82(2): 175 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. M. Piper, Y. Abdallah, S. Kasseckert, and K.-D. Schluter
Sarcoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrial interaction in the mechanism of acute reperfusion injury
Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2008; 77(2): 234 - 236.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
P. Ferdinandy, R. Schulz, and G. F. Baxter
Interaction of Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury, Preconditioning, and Postconditioning
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2007; 59(4): 418 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]