Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2001 52(2):174-177; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00457-6
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, S. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, S. D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2001, European Society of Cardiology

The pathophysiology of cardiac syndrome X — a tale of paradigm shifts

Stuart D Rosen*

Department of Heart Function, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK

* Correspondence address: Department of Cardiology, Ealing Hospital, Uxbridge Road, Middlesex UB1 3HW, UK. Tel.: +44-20-8967-5359; fax: +44-20-8967-5007 stuart.rosen@ic.ac.uk

Received 24 August 2001; accepted 30 August 2001

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

See article by Gulli et al. [18] (pages 208–216) in this issue.


    1. Introduction
 
The aetiology of cardiac syndrome X — the problem of the patient with chest pain of anginal quality, ischaemic-like changes on the stress electrocardiogram (ECG) but a normal coronary arteriogram — continues to fascinate many engaged in cardiovascular research. It is a field of endeavour which has gone through a number of ‘paradigm shifts’ during the 28 years since the term was coined by Harvey Kemp [1], commenting on the ‘Group X’ subset of patients in Arbogast and Bourassa’s seminal paper on patients with angina and ‘normal or near normal’ coronary angiograms [2].

The first and most obvious mechanism of chest pain to be indicated was that of true myocardial ischaemia, but since the epicardial vessels were normal by definition, the microcirculation seemed the likely site of impairment of flow (or flow reserve) [3]. In . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    2. The sympathetic nervous system and the aetiology of cardiac syndrome X
 

    3. Studies of heart rate variability in cardiac syndrome X
 

    4. Pain perception and sympathetic activation in patients with syndrome X
 

    5. Conclusion
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
I. A.C. Vermeltfoort, O. Bondarenko, P. G.H.M. Raijmakers, D. A.M. Odekerken, A. F.M. Kuijper, A. Zwijnenburg, M. J.E. van der Vis-Melsen, J. W.R. Twisk, A. M. Beek, G. J.J. Teule, et al.
Is subendocardial ischaemia present in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms? A cardiovascular MR study
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2007; 28(13): 1554 - 1558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Madaric, J. Bartunek, K. Verhamme, M. Penicka, E. Van Schuerbeeck, P. Nellens, G. R. Heyndrickx, W. Wijns, M. Vanderheyden, and B. De Bruyne
Hyperdynamic Myocardial Response to Beta-Adrenergic Stimulation in Patients With Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Arteries
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 4, 2005; 46(7): 1270 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. D. Rosen
Hearts and minds: psychological factors and the chest pain of cardiac syndrome X
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2004; 25(19): 1672 - 1674.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. G. Bertoni, A. Tsai, E. K. Kasper, and F. L. Brancati
Diabetes and Idiopathic Cardiomyopathy: A nationwide case-control study
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2003; 26(10): 2791 - 2795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]