Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1998 37(1):1-2; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(97)00269-1
© 1998 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Opthof, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Opthof, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1998, European Society of Cardiology

How to handle an over 25% increase in submissions

Tobias Opthof1

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Recently, the number of submissions to Cardiovascular Research has increased by more than 25% (Fig. 1). We assume that this may be partly explained by the huge increase in impact factor over the recent years [1]from 1.47 in . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cardiovasc ResHome page
R. Coronel and T. Opthof
The role of the reviewer in editorial decision-making
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 1999; 43(2): 261 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]