Cardiovascular Research Advance Access first published online on August 5, 2009
This version [Corrected Proof] published online on August 25, 2009
Cardiovascular Research, doi:10.1093/cvr/cvp271
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reduction of infarct size by gentle reperfusion without activation of reperfusion injury salvage kinases in pigs
Institut für Pathophysiologie, Westdeutsches Herzzentrum Essen, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45122 Essen, Germany
* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 201 723 4480, Fax: +49 201 723 4481, Email: gerd.heusch{at}uk-essen.de
Aims: Reperfusion is mandatory to salvage ischaemic myocardium from infarction, but also induces additional reperfusion injury and contributes to infarct size (IS). Gentle reperfusion (GR) has been proposed to attenuate reperfusion injury, but this remains contentious. We now investigated whether (i) GR reduces IS and (ii) GR is associated with the activation of reperfusion injury salvage kinases (RISK).
Methods and results: Anaesthetized pigs were subjected to 90 min left anterior descending coronary artery hypoperfusion and 120 min reperfusion. GR was induced by slowly increasing coronary inflow back to baseline over 30 min, using an exponential algorithm [F(t) = Fi+e–(0.1t(min)–3)·(Fb–Fi); Fb, coronary inflow at baseline; Fi, coronary inflow during ischaemia; n = 12]. Pigs subjected to immediate full reperfusion (IFR; n = 13) served as controls. IS was determined by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining. The expression level of phosphorylated RISK proteins was determined by western blot analysis in myocardial biopsies taken at baseline, after 80–85 min ischaemia and at 10, 30, and 120 min reperfusion. In additional experiments with IFR (n = 3) and GR (n = 3), the PI3–AKT and MEK1/2–ERK1/2 pathways were pharmacologically blocked (BL). IS was 37 ± 2% (mean ± SEM) of the area at risk with IFR and 29 ± 1% (P < 0.05) with GR. RISK phosphorylation was similar between GR and IFR at baseline and 85 min ischaemia. At 10 min reperfusion, RISK phosphorylation was increased with IFR, but not with GR. At 30 and 120 min reperfusion, RISK phosphorylation was still greater with IFR than GR. RISK blockade did not abolish the IS reduction by GR (BL-IFR: 27 ± 4% of the area at risk; BL-GR: 42 ± 5%; P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Gentle reperfusion reduces infarct size in pigs, but RISK activation is not causally involved in this infarct size reduction.
KEYWORDS Cardioprotection; Myocardial ischaemia; RISK
Time for primary review: 20 days