Cardiovascular Research Advance Access originally published online on February 28, 2008
Cardiovascular Research 2008 78(2):324-332; doi:10.1093/cvr/cvn055
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of mechanical boundary conditions on orientation of angiogenic microvessels
1 Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, 50 South Central Campus Drive, Room 2480, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
2 Division of Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Cardiovascular Innovation Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
* Corresponding Author. Tel: +1 801 587 7834; fax: +1 801 535 6801. E-mail address: jeff.weiss{at}utah.edu
Aim: Mechanical forces are important regulators of cell and tissue phenotype. We hypothesized that mechanical loading and boundary conditions would influence neovessel activity during angiogenesis.
Methods and resuts: Using an in vitro model of angiogenesis sprouting and a mechanical loading system, we evaluated the effects of boundary conditions and applied loading. The model consisted of rat microvessel fragments cultured in a 3D collagen gel, previously shown to recapitulate angiogenic sprouting observed in vivo. We examined changes in neovascular growth in response to four different mechanical conditions. Neovessel density, diameter, length and orientation were measured from volumetric confocal images of cultures exposed to no external load (free-floating shape control), intrinsic loads (fixed ends, no stretch), static external load (static stretch), or cyclic external load (cyclic stretch). Neovessels sprouted and grew by the third day of culture and continued to do so during the next 3 days of loading. The numbers of neovessels and branch points were significantly increased in the static stretch group when compared with the free-floating shape control group. In all mechanically loaded cultures, neovessel diameter and length distributions were heterogeneous, whereas they were homogeneous in shape control cultures. Neovessels were significantly more oriented along the direction of mechanical loading than those in the shape controls. Interestingly, collagen fibrils were organized parallel and adjacent to growing neovessels.
Conclusion: Externally applied boundary conditions regulate neovessel sprouting and elongation during angiogenesis, affecting both neovessel growth characteristics and network morphometry. Furthermore, neovessels align parallel to the direction of stress/strain or internally generated traction, and this may be because of collagen fibril alignment induced by the growing neovessels themselves.
KEYWORDS Boundary conditions; Angiogenesis; Strain; Orientation; Morphometry; Image analysis
Time for primary review: 29 days
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J.-S. Silvestre, B. I. Levy, and A. Tedgui Mechanisms of angiogenesis and remodelling of the microvasculature Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2008; 78(2): 201 - 202. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|