Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2007 73(3):521-530; doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.11.025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomsen, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vos, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomsen, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vos, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2006, European Society of Cardiology

Proarrhythmic electrical remodelling is associated with increased beat-to-beat variability of repolarisation

Morten B. Thomsen1, Avram Oros1, Marieke Schoenmakers, Jurren M. van Opstal, Joep N. Maas, Jet D.M. Beekman and Marc A. Vos*

Department of Medical Physiology, Yalelaan 50, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +31 302 538 900; fax: +31 302 539 036. Email address: m.a.vos{at}umcutrecht.nl

Objective: Acquired long-QT syndrome in combination with increased beat-to-beat variability of repolarisation duration (BVR) is associated with lethal torsades de pointes arrhythmias (TdP) in dogs with remodelled heart after atrioventricular block (AVB). We evaluated the relative contributions of bradycardia and ventricular remodelling to proarrhythmic BVR with and without pharmacological IKr block in order to identify the individual at risk.

Methods: Three groups of dogs were used: sinus rhythm dogs (n=12), dogs with acute AVB (n=8), and dogs with >3 weeks chronic AVB (n=27). Under anaesthesia, ECG and monophasic action potential duration (MAPD) were measured. Local BVR was quantified as short-term variability from 30 consecutive left ventricular MAPD (STV={sum}|DniDn+1|/[30x{surd}2]). All dogs received dofetilide iv.

Results: The slower ventricular rate acutely after AVB affected neither QTc nor STV (288±18 to 293±38 ms and 0.7±0.1 to 0.7±0.1 ms, respectively; P=NS for both), whereas ventricular remodelling increased both (to 376±46 and 2.3±0.6 ms, respectively; P<0.05 for both). Neither dogs in sinus rhythm nor acute AVB showed any TdP, whereas dofetilide induced TdP in 74% of the chronic-AVB dogs. Dofetilide increased the QTc interval in all groups (19–24%; P<0.05 for all groups), whereas STV was elevated in chronic-AVB dogs only (to 4.2±1.5 ms; P<0.05) and further confined to inducible chronic-AVB dogs (5.0±0.8 versus 1.9±0.4 ms for resistant dogs; P<0.05). Variability of the idioventricular rate was increased directly after AVB and did not influence BVR.

Conclusions: Under drug-free circumstances, a persistent high BVR in chronic-AVB dogs is remodelling dependent rather than a direct consequence of bradycardia acutely after AVB. Variability of this slower rate does not influence BVR. Dofetilide causes a transient increase in BVR only in proarrhythmic dogs. Thus, BVR may aid the identification of the TdP-susceptible patient.

KEYWORDS ECG; Heart-rate variability; Remodelling; Repolarisation; Ventricular arrhythmias


1 Contributed equally as first authors.

Time for primary review 16 days


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.