Copyright © 2006, European Society of Cardiology
Inhibition of neointima formation by local delivery of estrogen receptor alpha and beta specific agonists
aDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
bTNO-Quality of Life, Gaubius Laboratory, Zernikedreef 9, 2333 CK Leiden, The Netherlands
cDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
dDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
eDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
* Corresponding author. Department of Cardiology, C5-P, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 71 526 6695; fax: +31 71 526 6886. Email address: j.w.jukema{at}lumc.nl
Objective: Neointima formation is the underlying mechanism of (in-stent) restenosis. 17β-Estradiol (E2) is known to inhibit injury-induced neointima formation and post-angioplasty restenosis. Estrogen receptor alpha (ER
) has been demonstrated to mediate E2 anti-restenotic properties. However, the role of estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) is not fully elucidated. In the present study, the specific role of vascular ER
and ERβ in neointima formation is assessed.
Methods and results: Neointima formation was induced by placement of a perivascular cuff around the femoral artery of male C57BL/6J mice. E2-eluting cuffs significantly inhibited cuff-induced neointima formation. To address the specific roles of ER
and ERβ on neointima formation, the ER
-selective agonist 4,4',4''-(4-propyl-[1H]-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl)tris-phenol (PPT) and the ERβ-selective agonist 2,3-bis(4-hydroxy-phenyl)-propionitrile (DPN) were applied via a drug-eluting cuff. PPT inhibited neointima formation at low but not at high concentrations. Conversely, DPN inhibited neointima formation dose dependently. To demonstrate the specificity of these responses, an ER
-selective antagonist, MPP, was also used in combination with E2, PPT, or DPN. While the effect of PPT on neointima formation inhibition was blocked by co-delivery of MPP, E2 and DPN could still inhibit neointima formation.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that, in addition to ER
, specific ERβ activation inhibits neointima formation in a mouse model of restenosis. These data reveal a yet unidentified protective role of ERβ on neointima formation.
KEYWORDS Estrogens; Hormones; Receptors; Restenosis; Animal model
1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Time for primary review 29 days
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Xing, S. Nozell, Y.-F. Chen, F. Hage, and S. Oparil Estrogen and Mechanisms of Vascular Protection Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2009; 29(3): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
