Copyright © 2006, European Society of Cardiology
The enigma of Mayer waves: Facts and models
Laboratoire de Physiologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, 8, avenue Rockefeller, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon 69373 Cedex 08, France
* Tel.: +33 478 77 70 72; fax: +33 478 77 71 18. Email address: julien{at}univ-lyon1.fr
Mayer waves are oscillations of arterial pressure occurring spontaneously in conscious subjects at a frequency lower than respiration (
0.1 Hz in humans). Mayer waves are tightly coupled with synchronous oscillations of efferent sympathetic nervous activity and are almost invariably enhanced during states of sympathetic activation. For this reason, the amplitude of these oscillations has been proposed as a surrogate measure of sympathetic activity, although in the absence of a clear knowledge of their underlying physiology. Some studies have suggested that Mayer waves result from the activity of an endogenous oscillator located either in the brainstem or in the spinal cord. Other studies, mainly based on the effects of sinoaortic baroreceptor denervation, have challenged this view. Several models of dynamic arterial pressure control have been developed to predict Mayer waves. In these models, it was anticipated that the numerous dynamic components and fixed time delays present in the baroreflex loop would result in the production of a resonant, self-sustained oscillation of arterial pressure. Recent analysis of the various transfer functions of the rat baroreceptor reflex suggests that Mayer waves are transient oscillatory responses to hemodynamic perturbations rather than true feedback oscillations. Within this frame, the amplitude of Mayer waves would be determined both by the strength of the triggering perturbations and the sensitivity of the sympathetic component of the baroreceptor reflex.
KEYWORDS Autonomic nervous system; Baroreflex; Blood pressure
1 The slow AP oscillations originally described by S. Mayer in anesthetized rabbits [1] had a frequency of 6 to 9 cycles/min, i.e., 0.1 to 0.15 Hz, which is slower than the frequency of spontaneous sympathetically mediated AP oscillations in conscious rabbits (0.3 Hz). The term Mayer wave is therefore incorrect, but shall be used here due to its widespread use in this way.
Time for primary review 39 days
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Bernardi, C. Porta, G. Casucci, R. Balsamo, N. F. Bernardi, R. Fogari, and P. Sleight Dynamic Interactions Between Musical, Cardiovascular, and Cerebral Rhythms in Humans Circulation, June 30, 2009; 119(25): 3171 - 3180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Montano, R. Furlan, S. Guzzetti, R. M McAllen, and C. Julien Analysis of sympathetic neural discharge in rats and humans Phil Trans R Soc A, April 13, 2009; 367(1892): 1265 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Di Rienzo, G Parati, A Radaelli, and P Castiglioni Baroreflex contribution to blood pressure and heart rate oscillations: time scales, time-variant characteristics and nonlinearities Phil Trans R Soc A, April 13, 2009; 367(1892): 1301 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-L. Balligand, O. Feron, and C. Dessy eNOS Activation by Physical Forces: From Short-Term Regulation of Contraction to Chronic Remodeling of Cardiovascular Tissues Physiol Rev, April 1, 2009; 89(2): 481 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Porta, F. Aletti, F. Vallais, and G. Baselli Multimodal signal processing for the analysis of cardiovascular variability Phil Trans R Soc A, January 28, 2009; 367(1887): 391 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Nowak, A. Ocon, I. Taneja, M. S. Medow, and J. M. Stewart Multiresolution wavelet analysis of time-dependent physiological responses in syncopal youths Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): H171 - H179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|