Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2006 69(1):98-106; doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.08.012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zemlin, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pertsov, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zemlin, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pertsov, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2005, European Society of Cardiology

Near-threshold field stimulation: Intramural versus surface activation

Christian W. Zemlin, Sergey Mironov and Arkady M. Pertsov*

Deparment Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams Street, 13210 Syracuse, NY, United States

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 315 464 7986; fax: +1 315 464 8014. Email address: pertsova{at}upstate.edu

Objective: The mechanism by which an electric field terminates arrhythmias continues to puzzle investigators. Existing experimental methods provide information about epicardial manifestations of electrical cardioversion, yet little is known about field effects deep inside the myocardium. Here we combine specially designed optical mapping experiments and computer modeling to separate the intra-myocardial and surface field effects.

Methods: We used isolated coronary perfused and superfused slabs of pig right ventricular wall (n=6) stained with di-4-ANNEPS. A uniform transmural field was produced via two parallel planar (5 x 5 cm) transparent mesh electrodes aligned with the endocardial and epicardial surfaces. Low-intensity shocks (≥ 3.3 V/cm) were applied during diastole. The electrical activity under both electrodes was recorded simultaneously using two CCD cameras at 800 frames/s. Shock responses were also simulated using a bidomain Luo–Rudy model.

Results: We discovered that during the near-threshold diastolic field stimulation, when surface polarization should be dominant, the early activation occurs not at the cathodal surface, as might be expected, but deep inside the myocardium. Comparison of epi- and endocardial activation delays suggests that the sites of early activation are located closer to the endocardium. Our experimental observations could be reproduced computationally by assuming large resistive heterogeneities inside the myocardial wall.

Conclusions: Surface polarization plays a minor role during field stimulation. Intramural virtual electrodes produced even by weak fields are sufficiently strong to initiate intra-myocardial excitation. Significant heterogeneities in tissue resistivity may explain the strength of the virtual electrodes.

KEYWORDS Defibrillation; Excitation; Virtual electrodes; Optical mapping; Voltage-sensitive dyes


Time for primary review 23 days


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.