Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2005 68(1):118-127; doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.05.023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, J.
Right arrow Articles by Masuyama, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, J.
Right arrow Articles by Masuyama, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2005, European Society of Cardiology

Different effects of long- and short-acting loop diuretics on survival rate in Dahl high-salt heart failure model rats

Junichi Yoshidaa,b, Kazuhiro Yamamotoa,*, Toshiaki Manoa,b, Yasushi Sakataa,b, Mayu Nishioa,b, Tomohito Ohtania,b, Masatsugu Horia, Takeshi Miwab and Tohru Masuyamac

aDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, (A8) Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan
bGenome Information Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
cCardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 6 6879 6612; fax: +81 6 6879 6613. Email address: kazuhiro{at}medone.med.osaka-u.ac.jp

Objectives: We compared therapeutic effects of furosemide, a short-acting loop diuretic, and azosemide, a long-acting one, in hypertensive heart failure rats to test the hypothesis that long-acting diuretics are superior to short-acting types in heart failure.

Methods: Dahl salt-sensitive rats fed an 8% NaCl diet from age 8 weeks were divided at age 21 weeks (compensated hypertrophic stage) into three groups: rats treated with furosemide (40 mg/kg/day), those treated with azosemide (80 mg/kg/day) and untreated rats. Rats fed a 0.3% NaCl diet served as controls.

Results: Both medications prevented left ventricular systolic dysfunction and enlargement at age 31 weeks, and attenuated macrophage infiltration, reactive oxygen species generation, and gelatinolytic activity to the same degree. Azosemide suppressed left ventricular fibrosis to the control level, but furosemide did not. Azosemide ameliorated myocardial catecholamine depletion and improved survival rate. Furosemide increased plasma norepinephrine levels and did not exert such beneficial effects.

Conclusions: Azosemide provided better prognosis in heart failure rats compared with furosemide, partly through attenuation of the reflex increase in cardiac sympathetic neuronal activity caused by the development of heart failure. The current findings suggest a need for clinical trials examining whether long- and short-acting diuretics provide a different prognosis in patients with heart failure.

KEYWORDS Antihypertensive/diuretic agents; Heart failure; Hormones


Time for primary review 28 days


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Lopez, A. Gonzalez, J. Beaumont, R. Querejeta, M. Larman, and J. Diez
Identification of a Potential Cardiac Antifibrotic Mechanism of Torasemide in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 28, 2007; 50(9): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.