Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2003 57(4):1062-1071; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00727-7
© 2003 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Starmer, C.F.
Right arrow Articles by Colatsky, T.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Starmer, C.F.
Right arrow Articles by Colatsky, T.J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2003, European Society of Cardiology

What happens when cardiac Na channel function is compromised? 2. Numerical studies of the vulnerable period in tissue altered by drugs

C.Frank Starmera,*, A.O. Grantb and T.J. Colatskyc

aDepartments of Biometry/Epidemiology and Medicine (Cardiology), Charleston, SC 29425, USA
bDepartment of Medicine (Cardiology), Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
cDepartment of Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA

starmerf{at}musc.edu, http://www.musc.edu/~starmerf

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-843-792-0215; fax: +1-843-792-0258

Objective: The fate of an impulse arising from stimulation is determined by the ability of the wave front to recruit sufficient Na channels from adjacent cells. Previous numerical studies of mutant Na channels revealed both the velocity of a conditioning wave and the recruiting capacity of the front as determinants of the vulnerable period (VP), an interval within which excitation results in unidirectional conduction. Drugs that block excitatory Na channels in a voltage dependent manner, such as antiarrhythmics, abused substances and antidepressants, slow the restoration of Na conductance trailing an action potential and are associated with proarrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. We hypothesized that drug-induced slowing of Na conductance recovery would flatten the Na conductance restoration gradient thereby reducing the recruiting capacity of a front, extending the VP and increasing the probability of unidirectional propagation. Methods: In a cable of ventricular cells, we explored the sensitivity of the VP to voltage-dependent blockade. While varying the unbinding time constant from 100 ms to 5 s, we measured the Na conductance restoration gradient, the liminal length, the refractory period (RP) and the VP. Results: Reducing the rate of drug unbinding flattened the restoration gradient, diminished the recruiting capacity of a premature impulse and extended the liminal length, RP and the VP. The VP was linearly dependent on the drug unbinding time constant. Rapidly unbinding drugs (time constant <1 s) reduced the liminal length below that of a quiescent cable. Conclusions: Slowing the unbinding rate of voltage-dependent drug block of Na channels extended the RP and the VP. Drugs with unbinding time constants greater than 1 s dramatically increased the probability of unidirectional propagation, reflecting increases in both the RP and the VP. This study provides a new mechanism linking Na channel function, compromised by voltage-dependent Na channel drug block, with proarrhythmic conditions that can lead to sudden cardiac death following premature stimulation.

KEYWORDS Antiarrhythmic agents; Arrhythmia (mechanisms); Computer modelling; Conduction (block); Impulse formation; Na-channel; Ventricular arrhythmias


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.