Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2002 53(2):341-347; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00485-0
© 2002 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, I. B
Right arrow Articles by Webb, D. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, I. B
Right arrow Articles by Webb, D. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2001, European Society of Cardiology

High plasma concentrations of human urotensin II do not alter local or systemic hemodynamics in man

Ian B Wilkinsona,1, Jonathan T Affoltera, Sanne L de Haasa, M Paola Pellegrinia,2, Judith Boyda, Matthew J Winterb, Richard J Balmentb and David J Webba,*

aClinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2LH, UK
bSchool of Biological Science, G.38 Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

d.j.webb{at}ed.ac.uk

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-131-537-2006; fax: +44-131-537-2003

Objective: Human urotensin II (hUII) is an endocrine hormone that acts as a potent arterial vasoconstrictor in both in vitro and in vivo studies in animals. We examined, for the first time, the local and systemic hemodynamic response to hUII in man in vivo. Methods: Four healthy male volunteers took part in pilot studies and 11 in definitive studies. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured in response to intra-arterial infusion of authentic, biologically active hUII (incremental rates of 0.001–300 pmol min–1) and saline placebo using venous occlusion plethysmography. Blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output and hUII plasma concentrations were also measured. Forearm studies were repeated in five subjects with inhibition of endothelial mediators using aspirin and a "nitric oxide clamp". Dorsal hand vein diameter was determined by a standard displacement technique in response to local administration of hUII (3–300 pmol min–1) with and without nitric oxide synthase inhibition. Results: There was no significant change in FBF during brachial infusion of saline or hUII (dose range, 0.001 to 300 pmol min–1). A nitric oxide clamp did not unmask vasoactive effects of hUII. Human UII infusions (100 and 300 pmol min–1) significantly increased plasma hUII concentrations from baseline (12±3 pmol l–1) to 106±15 and 307±98 pmol l–1, respectively. Despite high circulating hUII concentrations, no change was seen in systemic hemodynamics and ECGs were unchanged. Human UII had no effect on hand vein diameter (n=6). Conclusions: In contrast to our hypothesised role of hUII, we found no vasoactive responses to hUII in vivo, consistent with recent in vitro studies in human blood vessels, but in contrast to non-human primate studies in vivo. Our data do not support a key role for hUII in the regulation of vascular tone and resting blood pressure in man. However, studies with hUII receptor antagonists are also needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

KEYWORDS Arteries; Blood pressure; Hemodynamics; Regional blood flow; Veins


2 Present address: Cardiologia, Clinica San Carlo, via Ospedale 21, Paderno Dugnano, Milano, Italy.

1 Present address: Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. D. Leonard, J. P. Thompson, E. L. Hutchinson, S. P. Young, J. McDonald, J. Swanevelder, and D. G. Lambert
Urotensin II receptor expression in human right atrium and aorta: effects of ischaemic heart disease
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2009; 102(4): 477 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
A. E. S. Abdel-Razik, R. J. Balment, and N. Ashton
Enhanced renal sensitivity of the spontaneously hypertensive rat to urotensin II
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F1239 - F1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. P. Williams, J. P. Thompson, S. P. Young, S. J. Gold, J. McDonald, D. J. Rowbotham, and D. G. Lambert
Nociceptin and urotensin-II concentrations in critically ill patients with sepsis
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2008; 100(6): 810 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
S. Kruger, J. Graf, D. Kunz, T. Stickel, M. W. Merx, P. Hanrath, and U. Janssens
Urotensin II in patients with chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2005; 7(4): 475 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.