© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
Copyright © 2001, European Society of Cardiology
Remodeling of atrial dimensions and emptying function in canine models of atrial fibrillation
aDepartment of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and University of Montreal, 5000 Belanger Street East, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H1T 1C8
bDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1Y6
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-514-376-3330 ext. 3990; fax: +1-514-376-1355 nattel{at}icm.umontreal.ca
Objectives: Atrial tachycardia-induced remodeling (ATR) and ventricular tachypacing-induced heart failure (HF) create experimental substrates for atrial fibrillation (AF), and both have been reported to produce atrial dilation and hypocontractility. The relative importance of changes in atrial size and contractility in the two models is unknown. This study compared changes in atrial dimensions and emptying in ATR versus HF dog models and related them to AF promotion. Methods: In ATR dogs (n=11), the right atrium (RA) was paced at 400/min for 42 days. In HF dogs (n=10), the right ventricle was paced at 240 bpm for 2 weeks, followed by 3 weeks at 220 bpm. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at baseline and weekly thereafter. At a terminal electrophysiological study, RA effective refractory period (ERP) was recorded and AF induced repeatedly by atrial burst pacing to measure mean AF duration (DAF). Results: Left atrial (LA) systolic area increased by 10.0% in ATR versus 48.2% in HF dogs (P=0.008), with significant time-dependent changes in HF (P=0.0001), but not ATR (P=0.16). LA diastolic area increased over time in both groups (P=0.004, 0.0001 for ATR and HF respectively), but increases were much larger in CHF (80.2%) compared to ATR (24.2%, P=0.0002). Similar findings were obtained for RA. Fractional area shortening (FAS) decreased by 19.4% (ATR) versus 41.8% (HF, P=0.007) in LA and 13.7% (ATR) versus 33.7% (HF, P=0.03) in RA. RA ERP correlated with DAF in ATR dogs (r=–0.79, P<0.001), but not in HF dogs (r=0.20, P=NS). DAF and diastolic areas of RA and LA were highly correlated (r=0.71, 0.77; P<0.01 for each) in HF dogs, but not in ATR dogs (r=–0.18, 0.29; P=NS). Conclusions: Remodeling of atrial size and emptying function is much greater in HF than in ATR. Whereas in ATR, electrophysiological remodeling is of prime importance in AF promotion, structural remodeling (as reflected in changes in atrial size and contraction) appears much more important in HF-induced AF.
KEYWORDS Arrhythmia (mechanisms); Atrial function; Heart failure; Remodeling; Supraventr. arrhythmia
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. L. Serra and M. Bendersky Review: Atrial fibrillation and renin-angiotensin system Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Nattel, B. Burstein, and D. Dobrev Atrial Remodeling and Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Implications Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, April 1, 2008; 1(1): 62 - 73. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|