Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 2000 46(2):324-331; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00432-0
© 2000 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brilla, C. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brilla, C. G
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2000, European Society of Cardiology

Regression of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease: diverse effects of various antihypertensive drugs

Christian G Brilla*

Center of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Philipps University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, D-35033 Marburg, Germany

* Tel.: +49-642-1286-4980; fax +49-642-470-094 brilla{at}t-online.de

Objective: In left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) due to systemic hypertension, myocardial fibrosis is an important determinant of pathologic hypertrophy. Therefore, it is most relevant to utilize an antihypertensive regimen that permits a regression in myocardial fibrosis along with blood pressure normalization and regression of LVH. Methods: To address this issue we examined 60 Sprague—Dawley rats. We treated 16-week-old rats having established LVH and myocardial fibrosis due to 8-week renovascular hypertension (RHT) with either 6 mg/kg/day zofenopril (ZOF), 30 mg/kg/day nifedipine (NIF) or 40 mg/kg/day labetalol (LAB) for 12 weeks. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP, mmHg), left ventricular/body weight ratio (LV/BW, mg/g), and left and right ventricular collagen volume fractions (LVCVF, RVCVF, %) were obtained and compared with age/sex matched untreated rats with RHT and sham-operated controls. Results: In RHT, SAP was significantly elevated compared with controls (188±11 vs. 125±5 mmHg; P<0.001) while in each treated group SAP was normalized. LV/BW was significantly increased in RHT (2.61±0.12 mg/g; P<0.00001) while in each treated group LVH was completely regressed (P<0.002 vs. untreated RHT) with LV/BW values comparable to controls (1.82±0.03 mg/g) irrespective of the utilized antihypertensive agent. In untreated RHT, myocardial fibrosis was present in the left (LVCVF: 12.3±1.9%; P<0.0005 vs. 4.5±0.2% of controls) and right ventricles (RVCVF: 20.6±2.5%; P<0.00005 vs. 8.8±0.4% of controls). In rats treated with ZOF or NIF, LVCVF was significantly reduced to 5.6±0.4 and 5.4±0.6%, respectively (P<0.005 vs. untreated RHT), and RVCVF was decreased as well (ZOF: 11.0±0.9%; NIF: 10.4±2.4%; P<0.007 vs. untreated RHT) where no significant difference to controls remained. In contrast, treatment with LAB did not affect myocardial fibrosis where LVCVF was 9.3±1.3% and RVCVF was 19.8±2.8%, i.e., remained significantly elevated compared with controls (P<0.007). Conclusions: In rats with renovascular hypertension and hypertensive heart disease that included LVH and fibrosis, equipotent doses of ZOF, NIF, and LAB normalized arterial pressure associated with regression of LVH while only ZOF and NIF were found to regress myocardial fibrosis.

KEYWORDS ACE inhibitors; Adrenergic (ant)agonists; Antihypertensive agents; Fibrosis; Hypertension; Hypertrophy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.