Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1998 39(2):413-422; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(98)00117-5
© 1998 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shen, Y.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shen, Y.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1998, European Society of Cardiology

Combined effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor antagonism in conscious pigs with congestive heart failure

You-Tang Shen*, R.T. Wiedmann, B.D. Greenland, J.J. Lynch and W. Grossman

Department of Pharmacology, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA

* Corresponding author. Tel.: 001-215-652-2640; Fax: 001-215-652-4692.

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine if the hemodynamic effects of the combined administration of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist are greater than those produced by either of these agents administered individually during heart failure. Methods: Ten farm pigs were chronically instrumented with aortic, left atrial and right atrial catheters, a left ventricular (LV) pressure gauge, LV dimension crystals, coronary occluders, an ascending aortic flow probe and pacing leads. Heart failure was induced by serial myocardial infarctions followed by repeated rapid ventricular pacing. Results: Heart failure was manifested by significant (p<0.01) decreases in LV dP/dt (–38±5%, from 2943±107 mmHg/s) and cardiac output (–27±4%, from 4.1±0.2 l/min) and increases in left atrial pressure (+18±1 mmHg, from 4±1 mmHg) and total peripheral resistance (TPR)(+40±8%, from 23±2 mmHg/l/min). The effects of an ACE inhibitor (enalaprilat) and an AT1 receptor antagonist (L-158,809), administered in maximally effective doses, either individually or concomitantly, were examined on different days in conscious pigs with heart failure. There were no differences in any of the baseline hemodynamic measurements among the groups studied. Thirty minutes after administration, enalaprilat (4 mg/kg i.v.) increased (p<0.05) cardiac output by 8±2% and reduced (p<0.05) mean arterial pressure and TPR by 5±1 and 12±1%, respectively, while the changes in LV dP/dt (0±2%), LV fractional shortening (+4±3%) and heart rate (+1±1%) were not statistically significant. Similarly, L-158,809 (4 mg/kg, i.v.) increased cardiac output by 9±2% and reduced mean arterial pressure and TPR by 4±1 and 11±3%, respectively, while the changes in LV dP/dt (+3±3%), LV fractional shortening (+3±1%) and heart rate (0±1%) were not significant. However, enalaprilat (1 mg/kg, i.v.) and L-158,809 (1 mg/kg, i.v.), administered concomitantly, reduced TPR by 21±3%, an effect greater (p<0.05) than when either of these agents was administered individually at a dose of 4 mg/kg, i.v. The changes in mean arterial pressure (–9±2%), cardiac output (+15±4%) and LV fractional shortening (+11±3%) also tended to be greater with concomitant administration. In addition, in a sequential dosing protocol, when L-158,809 (1 mg/kg, i.v.) was administered 30 min after enalaprilat (1 mg/kg, i.v.), TPR was reduced by 20±4% compared to only a 6±3% reduction (p<0.05) when the enalaprilat was followed 30 min later by a second dose of enalaprilat (1 mg/kg, i.v.). The changes in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output for the combined treatment group also tended to be greater than those for the group given two sequential doses of enalaprilat. Conclusion: In conscious pigs with heart failure, the combined vasodilatory effects of an ACE inhibitor and AT1 receptor antagonist are greater than those produced when only one of these agents is administered, suggesting that independent mechanisms of ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor antagonism could be partly responsible for the improved vascular dynamics during heart failure.

KEYWORDS Cardiac function; Vascular resistance; Dose–response effects; Myocardial ischemia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Kawai, S. Y. Stevens, and C.-S. Liang
Renin-angiotensin system inhibition on noradrenergic nerve terminal function in pacing-induced heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): H3012 - H3019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
M. S Weinberg, A. J Weinberg, and D. H Zappe
Effectively targetting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cardiovascular and renal disease: rationale for using angiotensin II receptor blockers in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2000; 1(3): 217 - 233.
[PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
L. A.M. Zornoff, S. A.R. Paiva, B. B. Matsubara, L. S. Matsubara, and J. Spadaro
Combination Therapy with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition and AT1 Receptor Inhibitor on Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction in Rats
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 2000; 5(3): 203 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.