Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1998 39(2):381-392; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(98)00100-X
© 1998 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, L. M
Right arrow Articles by Opie, L. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, L. M
Right arrow Articles by Opie, L. H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1998, European Society of Cardiology

Glucose delivery is a major determinant of glucose utilisation in the ischemic myocardium with a residual coronary flow

Linda M King* and Lionel H Opie

MRC/UCT Ischemic Heart Disease Research Unit, UCT Medical School, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 (1865) 275 275; Fax: +44 (1865) 275 259; E mail: linda@bioch.ox.ac.uk

Background: Experimental data from isolated rat hearts suggest that glycolysis in severe myocardial ischemia is inhibited by accumulation of glycolytic metabolites. In contrast, positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with myocardial ischemia records a ‘mismatch’ between the decreased coronary flow in viable ischemic tissue and an increased fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) signal. To resolve this contradiction, we investigated glucose uptake at very low coronary flows in the isolated rat heart model. Methods: Rates of glucose uptake were measured in the isolated Langendorff-perfused Wistar rat heart, at control (12–15 ml/g wet wt/min) and low coronary flows (0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 ml/g wet wt/min) and at a range of glucose concentrations (2.75, 5.5, 11 and 22 mM). Results: The steady-state rate of glucose uptake versus glucose concentration could be described by a double rectangular hyperbola at each coronary flow. Glucose uptake fell to levels significantly below control at low coronary flows. However, the extraction of glucose (glucose uptake as % of glucose delivered) rose sharply, from 1% at control coronary flows, to 25–30% at low coronary flows. Crossover analysis of glycolytic intermediates in freeze-clamped tissue indicated little inhibition at any specific site, although phosphofructokinase activity was restricted when glycolytic substrate availability was high. Insulin and preconditioning both increased glucose uptake with 11 mM glucose, possibly by increasing membrane transporter density and thus increasing glucose delivery to the cytosol. Conclusions: Despite the reduction in absolute glucose uptake at low coronary flow-rates, the extraction of glucose was greatly increased, possibly following GLUT4 translocation. Delivery of glucose to the glycolytic pathway appears to be a major controlling site of glycolysis in low-flow ischemia. Downstream regulation is then distributed along the pathway with no one site exerting greater inhibition than reduced glucose delivery.

KEYWORDS Glycolysis; Ischemia; Metabolic regulation; Preconditioning; Rat


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
Y. Cottin, I. Lhuillier, L. Gilson, M. Zeller, C. Bonnet, C. Toulouse, P. Louis, L. Rochette, C. Girard, and J.-E. Wolf
Glucose insulin potassium infusion improves systolic function in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy
Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2002; 4(2): 181 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.