Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1998 37(1):225-235; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(97)00226-5
© 1998 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pries, A. R
Right arrow Articles by Gaehtgens, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pries, A. R
Right arrow Articles by Gaehtgens, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1998, European Society of Cardiology

Blood flow resistance during hemodilution: effect of plasma composition

Axel R Priesa,*, Timothy W Secombb, Markus Sperandioc and Peter Gaehtgensc

aDeutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
bDept. of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
cDept. of Physiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 22, D-14195 Berlin, Germany

* Corresponding author. Tel. (+49-30) 838 2087; Fax (+49-30) 838 4916; E-mail: pries@zedat.fu-berlin.de

Objectives: To investigate the causes of wide variations in reported effects of hemodilution on flow resistance of vascular beds. Methods: (a) In a meta-analysis of 28 prior studies, resistance values at hematocrits of zero (R0) and 0.45 (R0.45) were derived. Study design characteristics (presence of vasodilatory reserve or leukocytes, species, tissue, hemodiluent) were tested by ANOVA for their relation to the ratio R0/R0.45. (b) Experiments were performed to determine flow resistance during hemodilution in the rat mesentery with (n = 8) and without (n = 11) pretreatment with heparinase, which modifies the endothelial glycocalyx. (c) A mathematical flow simulation for mesenteric microvascular networks was used to predict resistance effects of hemodilution and of a hypothetical layer on the endothelial surface. Results: (a) In prior studies using native plasma for hemodilution R0 averaged 59±8% of R0.45, while in studies using artificial solutions R0 averaged 32±12% of R0.45. The larger reduction of flow resistance upon dilution with artificial media is independent of viscosity and oncotic pressure. Other design characteristics did not show strong significant effects. (b) Present experiments showed large reductions of flow resistance with saline hemodilution which were nearly halved after heparinase pretreatment. (c) Resistance effects of hemodilution with plasma or after heparinase treatment agree with model predictions based on tube flow rheology of blood. The larger resistance effects of dilution with artificial media can be explained by the removal of an endothelial surface layer of ~1.5 µm thickness. Conclusions: The results imply that changes of plasma composition, due to use of artificial infusion media, influence peripheral resistance and tissue perfusion. They are consistent with the hypothesis that interactions between endothelial glycocalyx structures and plasma components lead to formation of a thick layer at the endothelial surface which increases flow resistance.

KEYWORDS Hemodilution; Optimal hematocrit; Organ perfusion; Glycocalyx; Plasma proteins; Rat mesentery microvascular networks


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
H Vermeer, S Teerenstra, R. de Sevaux, H. van Swieten, and P. Weerwind
The effect of hemodilution during normothermic cardiac surgery on renal physiology and function: a review
Perfusion, November 1, 2008; 23(6): 329 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.