Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1997 33(3):583-592; doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(96)00255-6
© 1997 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petrou, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yacoub, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petrou, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yacoub, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1997, European Society of Cardiology

Comparative study of the biomechanical performance of trained and untrained skeletal muscle

M. Petroua,b, C. Bowlesa,b and M. Yacoub*,a,b

aNational Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
bHarefield Hospital, Middlesex, UK

Changes in contraction and relaxation parameters during chronic electrical stimulation can exert profound effects on diastolic augmentation during skeletal muscle assistance (SMA) of the circulation, in both short and long term. The physiological properties of latissimus dorsi muscle (LD) performance in a system that mimics the clinical setting has not been adequately studied. Objective: To quantify changes in the biomechanical performance of trained and untrained skeletal muscle in relation to circulatory assistance using an ex-vivo Windkessel mock circulation. Methods: Twelve Welsh Mountain sheep were divided into 2 groups: Group A (n = 6) underwent implantation of intramuscular electrodes into the left LD connected to a myostimulator (Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc., Colorado) and progressively trained by burst stimulation over a 12-week period using standard stimulation parameters (2.5-5 V, 35 Hz, 6 pulses per burst, 240 µs per pulse); Group B (n = 6) were the untrained controls. At the end of 12 weeks, the LD was mobilised on its neurovascular pedicle and wrapped around a latex rubber aorta connected to two Windkessel chambers pressurised to 70 mmHg and stimulated to contract 40 times per minute continuously for 60 min. Pressure change per contraction (augmentation, {Delta}P), volume displacement, contraction (Ct) and relaxation to 90% (Rt90) times, and the standardised rate of change of pressure generation (+dP/dt:{Delta}P) and decay (–dP/dt:{Delta}P) were determined and assessed for potential clinical efficacy. Results: In Group A, the LD was fatigue-resistant in all 6 animals with a mean pressure augmentation of 13.7 (s.e.m. 1.3) mmHg and mean stroke volume of 12.5 (s.e.m. 1.0) ml. These muscles were slow with a mean Ct and +dP/dt:{Delta}max of 243.2 (s.e.m. 6.1) ms and +6.5 s–1, respectively, and Rt90 and –dP/dt:{Delta}max of 261.0 (s.e.m. 4.8) ms and –7.8 s–1, respectively. In contrast, the LD in Group B was fatiguable with a mean pressure augmentation and stroke volume of 24.6 (s.e.m. 0.9) mmHg and 21.1 (s.e.m. 0.7) ml at 1 min and only 5.4 (s.e.m. 0.3) mmHg and 5.2 (s.e.m. 0.3) ml, respectively, at 30 min (P < 0.001). These muscles were faster at all time points compared to group A (P < 0.02). Acute diminution of power output per contraction in Group B coincided with a prolongation in the Rt90 by 101% compared to the Ct which decreased by less than 5% (P < 0.001). The Ct/Rt90 ratio did not significantly change during performance testing in Group A (fatigue-resistant animals) (P > 0.1). Conclusion: Using a mock circulation system, we have identified significant differences in biomechanical properties of trained and untrained skeletal muscle. Optimisation of these parameters during and after electrical training may alter the clinical efficacy of SMA.

KEYWORDS Skeletal muscle assist; Electrical training; Fatigue; Sheep; Mock circulation


* Corresponding author: Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK. Tel. +44 171 351-8533; Fax +44 171 351-8229.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.