Skip Navigation

Cardiovascular Research 1993 27(5):823-827; doi:10.1093/cvr/27.5.823
© 1993 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malfatto, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, P. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malfatto, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, P. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 1993, European Society of Cardiology

Parasympathetic control of cycle length dependence of endocardial ventricular repolarisation in the intact feline heart during steady state conditions

Gabriella Malfatto, Antonio Zaza and Peter J Schwartz

Universitá degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy - Istituto di Clinica Medica II: G Malfatto; Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Biochimica Generali: A Zaza; Dipartimento di Medicina, Universitá degli Studi di Pavia, Italy: P J Schwartz.

Correspondence to Dr Malfatto.

Objective: Parasympathetic modulation of the rate dependence of ventricular repolarisation in vivo during steady state conditions was investigated by analysing the effects of removing vagal activity in three groups of anaesthetised cats. Methods: Bilateral vagotomy was performed while different levels of background sympathetic tone were present in the control periods of each group: in group 1 (n=6), cardiac sympathetic nerves were intact; in group 2 (n=7), bilateral stellate ganglionectomy was performed; and in group 3 (n=7), β adrenergic blockade (propranolol, 0.5 mg·kg–1) was performed after stellate ganglionectomy. The duration of a left ventricular endocardial monophasic action potential (APD) was measured during atrial pacing at 7-10 cycle lengths (CL). The APD/CL relation was fitted to a hyperbolic function: APD=CL/[(axCL)+b]. Two parameters were considered: APDmax (1/a, ie, APD extrapolated at infinite cycle length, a rate-independent measure of APD) and CL50 (bxAPDmax, ie, the cycle length at which 50% of APDmax is reached). Results: In control conditions, APDmax and CL50 were longer in groups 2 and 3, when cardiac sympathetic effects were reduced or absent. Vagotomy reduced APDmax and CL50 similarly in groups 1 and 2 (APDmax, –24% and –18%; CL50, –36% and –27%) (p < 0.05 v control). In group 3, vagotomy did not affect APDmax and CL50. Conclusions: No direct parasympathetic influence on the rate dependence of endocardial ventricular repolarisation was observed. The vagal modulation of sympathetic effects may take place either through vago-sympathetic reflexes or via the antagonism of circulating catecholamines distal to the β receptor.

Cardiovascular Research 1993;27:823-827

KEYWORDS ventricular repolarisation; monophasic action potentials; autonomic nervous system; sympathetic-parasympathetic interaction; muscarinic stimulation


We are grateful to Ms Pinuccia De Toniasi for her care in the preparation of the manuscript.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G. Malfatto, M. Facchini, and A. Zaza
Characterization of the non-linear rate-dependency of QT interval in humans
Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(2): 163 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Dorian and D. Newman
Rate dependence of the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs delaying cardiac repolarization: an overview
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(4): 277 - 285.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.